- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Celina Midelfart might be what Trump is embarrassed about in relation to Epstein
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:32 am to SallysHuman
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:32 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Stop telling me to read your mind and just spell it out, already.
In cases involving networks of criminal activity, the head person is never convicted simply for giving illegal goods to a distributor. They are convicted of the distribution itself resulting from the distributor. This is how major drug dealers are brought down. This brings down the network distribution while busting buyers in the process.
But with Maxwell, it was “different”. Her case ended with Epstein, conveniently after he was dead, because he was that point of distribution. She wasn’t held accountable for what she knew he was doing because it would have exposed very rich and powerful people by definition.
And now, she wants to talk and name names. if Trump pardons her. But talk about what? Name what names? I thought Epstein was alone.
But that isn’t going to happen because that would entail actually draining the swamp.
This post was edited on 2/13/26 at 8:35 am
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:33 am to Boss13
Not as bad as our algebra teacher, Donna Fartblossom…
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:36 am to theunknownknight
quote:
But with Maxwell, it was “different”.
It wasn't.
quote:
Her case ended with Epstein, conveniently after he was dead,
The indictment was filed before he died.
quote:
She wasn’t held accountable for what she knew he was doing because it would have exposed very rich and powerful people by definition.
You know Maxwell and other victims have given depositions, right? Where these questions (by the victims' attorneys) weren't off limits, right?
You know what those civil suits produced outside of Maxwell-Epstein? Nothing except some potential dirt on Prince Andrew (which wasn't ever specifically established).
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:37 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The indictment was filed before he died.
It’s staring you right in the face
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:37 am to theunknownknight
Billionaires chase and catch hot chics, who knew?
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:38 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Why? Because I did my own research, linked it, and had a reasonable take?
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:40 am to theunknownknight
quote:
Her case ended with Epstein, conveniently after he was dead, because he was that point of distribution. She wasn’t held accountable for what she knew he was doing because it would have exposed very rich and powerful people by definition.
I can easily agree with this.
Hopefully these victims, whether or not they became perpetrators, can get this going and hold accountable any other men and women that groomed, abused and trafficked girls/women.
One thing that stands out to me though in what I've read... is that these were not crimes of force, but of coercion. No one should be paying 16yr old Cindy Lou for massages and sexual favors, but I have to say I've yet to see anything concrete that people were forced or that children were involved. It's vulnerable teenagers who willfully participated for money, exposure, favors, etc. Not that that is okay, because it isn't. This is disgusting preying on young women, but not necessarily even close to a pedophile trafficking ring.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:40 am to theunknownknight
quote:
It’s staring you right in the face
You're pivoting...not for the first time in this thread.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:40 am to theunknownknight
The goal in the first week after the release was to get Epstein Trump files trending
This post was edited on 2/13/26 at 8:43 am
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:41 am to riccoar
quote:
Ah, the emails right around his election timelines. All debunked.
Debunked? The DOJ released these
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:41 am to SallysHuman
quote:
but I have to say I've yet to see anything concrete that people were forced or that children were involved.
That is a WHOLE nother discussion.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:42 am to BBONDS25
quote:
is that what you think you did? Why didn’t you research the parts where Trump was snitching on Epstein?
Why would Trump be embarrassed by that? Other than it shows he knew and has known for decades.
Clearly people can’t read
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:43 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That is a WHOLE nother discussion.
Expound, please.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:46 am to SallysHuman
It's just echoing/confirming what you said, but the dot-connectors are not only trying to expand the network of those who had sex with the teens you referenced, but taking up to "11" and including the child rape stuff (even the point of bringing back up Pizzagate insanity).
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's just echoing/confirming what you said, but the dot-connectors are not only trying to expand the network of those who had sex with the teens you referenced, but taking up to "11" and including the child rape stuff (even the point of bringing back up Pizzagate insanity).
Gotcha.
I definitely believe there are some sick turds abusing children. I just don't know what that has to do with JE. It's like a convergence of every CT I ever read.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:53 am to SallysHuman
quote:
I definitely believe there are some sick turds abusing children
Sure, but we kind of need solid, credible, and direct evidence to start that mud slinging.
Or else you get what the DEMs are doing with Trump and Epstein.
quote:
I just don't know what that has to do with JE. It's like a convergence of every CT I ever read.
Nobody said CT logic was actual logic or had to make sense.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:58 am to Great Plains Drifter
quote:
Nothing has ever yet come forward that has ever changed my initial stance:
The Epstein stuff has been around for years now.
The Democratic Party and aligned Never-Trumpers have come up with every scenario imaginable since 2016 to rid themselves of DJT and MAGA.
But somehow, someway they ALL left Epstein completely alone UNTIL DJT was elected president a second time and was occupying the WH again.
It just does not pass the smell test. It amazes me that some people cannot easily see right through what the desperate Democrats and aligned Never-Trumpers are trying to pull.
Exactly, I am more concerned that one group, democrats, have run with so many lies in their attempts to destroy Trump. The democrats held all the levers of power and and all their efforts have been shown to have a lie at the core.
Why are more people not turning on the perpetrators of these hoaxes. The only thing I can come up with is they, themselves, are evil to their core.
Posted on 2/13/26 at 9:06 am to theunknownknight
you really need to get a life and some out door hobbies
Posted on 2/13/26 at 9:11 am to OccamsStubble
You forgot to type that in sarcasm text
Posted on 2/13/26 at 9:20 am to theunknownknight
quote:
I'm team Trump, retard
"I'm team Trump," he proclaims while attempting to smear his name. Retard indeed.
OP is just another TDS-infected person who has allowed himself to lose sight of the goal. He's more interested in causing catfights on the right than actually defeating the democrat scourge.
No one who supports Trump would attempt to smear him with Epstein after we already know that Trump kicked him out of MAL and was the only one who worked with law enforcement.
You're not fooling anyone with your posts.
Popular
Back to top



2








