- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Can Republicans take the super majority in the House away from the Democrats?
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:11 am
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:11 am
Need to flip about 80 seats.
7
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:12 am to deltaland
What’s a supermajority of the House? 
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:14 am to Y.A. Tittle
I guess technically there isn’t but you get my point
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:14 am to Y.A. Tittle
Well RINOS are democrats
They just label themselves ‘in name only’
They just label themselves ‘in name only’
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:16 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
What’s a supermajority of the House?
I'm pretty sure in order to pass constitutional amendments the House needs to pass any constitutional measure with a 2/3rds "super majority".
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:18 am to deltaland
Wouldn’t matter if they had a supermajority. They collaborate with the marxists.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:21 am to deltaland
I'm not sure they will get ANY majority in the House. That seems like it's always the uniparty game plan but dems aren't selling anything more appealing than Republicans.
The identity of their party is a purple-haired weirdo trooning her kids and screeching at ICE cops. Few people want to be that person.
The identity of their party is a purple-haired weirdo trooning her kids and screeching at ICE cops. Few people want to be that person.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:22 am to GumboPot
quote:
I'm pretty sure in order to pass constitutional amendments the House needs to pass any constitutional measure with a 2/3rds "super majority".
Yeah, nobody’s doing that in this climate regardless.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:23 am to deltaland
A supermajority by either would only mean one side might spend like a slightly less drunken sailor than the other.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:26 am to TheHarahanian
quote:
Wouldn’t matter if they had a supermajority. They collaborate with the marxists.
Which is even more imperative they get primaried but with an actual effort and money.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:28 am to deltaland
Your post is going over everyone's heads 
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:31 am to deltaland
How many seats does the Louisiana SCOTUS case affect?
Posted on 1/23/26 at 9:33 am to CAD703X
quote:The supermajority or the 80 seats? I tried to figure out if it was serious so I just responded with a quip.
Your post is going over everyone's heads
Posted on 1/23/26 at 10:41 am to Pragmatist2025
The point is around 60-80 current republicans vote with Dems so the Dems might as well have a super majority
Posted on 1/23/26 at 11:01 am to Y.A. Tittle
For the foreseeable future both sides are going to have to rely on thin majorities especially in the House irrespective of redistricting initiatives. At best you have a 52/48 percentage split for any party. A true consensus pushing past 55% is probably 20 years off for any party.
Posted on 1/23/26 at 1:34 pm to deltaland
quote:Got it. Funny and sad at the same time.
The point is around 60-80 current republicans vote with Dems so the Dems might as well have a super majority
Posted on 1/23/26 at 2:02 pm to deltaland
They wouldn’t do anything with it, they’ll get blown away tho
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News