Started By
Message

California passes new law where only have to put down 3% for new home instead of 20 %

Posted on 11/6/26 at 12:47 pm
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
47590 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 12:47 pm
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
177038 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 12:49 pm to
FHA loans already exist at 3.5%

0% down financing is already available for VA loans and some USDA loans

What exactly do you think that you've uncovered here?

Are they off the hook for PMI or still required to pay it?
Posted by BradBallard
Wilmington, Delaware
Member since Jun 2020
589 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 12:49 pm to
Party like it’s 2006!
Posted by Rip Torner
Member since Jul 2023
4523 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 12:50 pm to
Umm that’s been a thing
Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
20879 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 12:51 pm to
You've been able to put down 5% for as long as I can remember. What happens if you default on the Cali loan but not the mortgage?
Posted by Rip Torner
Member since Jul 2023
4523 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 12:51 pm to
You can avoid PMI at 20% but 97% loans have been a thing
Posted by Tigersforthee
Member since Dec 2025
1187 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 12:52 pm to
Using a second mortgage as a down payment will result in significantly higher default risks for pretty obvious reasons. Now this can make it easier for cash strapped folks who dont have 20% down to get into a home but these loans will default at a very high level and presumably the state (and primary mortgage lender) will get left holding the bag
Posted by TigerFanatic99
South Bend, Indiana
Member since Jan 2007
36808 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

How: the state lends you the other 17% as a second mortgage, funded by up to $25 billion in bonds.



Having two mortgages totaling a million instead of just one is really going to help make it affordable.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
177038 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

What happens if you default on the Cali loan but not the mortgage?

I'd have to imagine that risk is priced into the bond rates. Legit question though.

Posted by blue_morrison
Member since Jan 2013
5980 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 12:52 pm to
Is this supposed to draw people to move back lol
Posted by Deuces
The bottom
Member since Nov 2011
17324 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 12:53 pm to
Oh boy!

Let’s give more money to the banks and be in debt forever.

And you know what’s crazy….many of those banks are ran by the dreaded Jews. That’ll irritate some here.
This post was edited on 11/6/26 at 12:54 pm
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
18672 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

the state lends you the other 17% as a second mortgage, funded by up to $25 billion in bonds.


Oh I can't wait to check in on this in 5 years or so.
Posted by Billy Blanks
Member since Dec 2021
5324 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

FHA loans already exist at 3.5%

0% down financing is already available for VA loans and some USDA loans

What exactly do you think that you've uncovered here?

Are they off the hook for PMI or still required to pay it?


You think California homes are under the price point do that?
Posted by theliontamer
Chicago
Member since Nov 2015
2748 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 1:02 pm to
I mean, if ya cant save up 20% for a house, you're probably not gonna be a good homeowner.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
177038 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

You think California homes are under the price point do that?

I think California is a big state with a great degree of varying pricing depending on location and quality/size of the domicile.

Every now and then I get bored and start looking at home prices in different areas. Obviously you're not going to find cheap housing in Rancho Palos Verdes or Manhattan Beach but there are places in California where the housing isn't as steep as you might think. Whether you would actually want to live there is another story but that goes for every state.
Posted by Lou
Modesto, CA
Member since Aug 2005
9250 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 1:08 pm to
Translation: Voters choose to use collective tax dollars to pay private mortgage insurance for individuals.
Posted by SundayFunday
Member since Sep 2011
10671 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

FHA loans already exist at 3.5%

0% down financing is already available for VA loans and some USDA loans


Both are limited options for those who are found to qualify. This is for everyone


Did you even think as you were typing ?


Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
42487 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Are they off the hook for PMI or still required to pay it?


Off the hook, that's the point. It is essentially a 17% downpayment assistance program.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
42487 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 1:14 pm to
Going to be interesting to see how lenders adjust because in reality, the borower isn't really in any better shape. Yes they are only on the hook for 80% of the mortgage insteady of potentially 97%, but the borrower is just as risky of a borrower in both scenarios.
Posted by Bill Parker?
Member since Jan 2013
5670 posts
Posted on 11/6/26 at 1:16 pm to
This could get really messy. Less conservative banks push for loans to close to increase their portfolio by using internal evaluations of collateral.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram