- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: California is set to hit its green-energy goals a decade early
Posted on 12/27/17 at 12:45 am to rickgrimes
Posted on 12/27/17 at 12:45 am to rickgrimes
There's nothing wrong with have alternative sources of energy developed and ready to go when cheap energy is depleted.
But stay with the cheap stuff until it's all gone.
But stay with the cheap stuff until it's all gone.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 12:48 am to beerJeep
Fair enough, it’s just odd that there’s a portion of the right leaning guys on here that understand it’s a hybrid of human and natural causes, and there’s another portion who think Jesus is coming back anyday and there’s no way we could affect the earth. Most of them have all their ‘gotcha’ questions ready to go that they learned from somewhere. The problem I see is that neither of these groups on the board ever are in the same thread. I see them separately always.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 12:54 am to olddawg26
quote:
it’s just odd that there’s a portion of the right leaning guys on here that understand it’s a hybrid of human and natural causes, and there’s another portion who think Jesus is coming back anyday and there’s no way we could affect the earth.
There are idiots on both sides. Right and left.
quote:
Most of them have all their ‘gotcha’ questions ready to go that they learned from somewhere.
Both sides do this. Especially on this topic as neither side can be proven right or wrong.
quote:That's because climate change threads, like religious threads, are always shite shows. So more level headed people try to stay away. It's pointless arguing over something no one can prove either way.
The problem I see is that neither of these groups on the board ever are in the same thread. I see them separately always.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 12:55 am to beerJeep
quote:
Did I say it's a huge impact on their populations? Causing them to go extinct? Nope. Just said they kill birds... Which they do.
Yes you did actually :
quote:
Wind farms kill off endangered birds.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 12:56 am to iPadThai
quote:
So you are saying the Oil and Gas industry never benefitted from any government subsidies or perks?
Are you saying that the current market position of Oil and Gas are primarily related to government subsidies or perks?
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:02 am to crewdepoo
Ohhhh I see. I wasn't meaning they make them go extinct. Just that they kill endangered birds. Which they do.
Sorry I misspoke. You caught me.
Wind farms kill a bunch of birds. Including endangered species. Is that better?
Sorry I misspoke. You caught me.
Wind farms kill a bunch of birds. Including endangered species. Is that better?
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:20 am to rickgrimes
Accounting slight of hand. Just like Georgetown "100% renewable" Texas
Posted on 12/27/17 at 1:28 am to rickgrimes
Is this why my SDG&E bill goes up around 14% every year, even though I sparingly use my AC or heater?
Posted on 12/27/17 at 5:15 am to TigerOnTheMountain
quote:
That article reads a lot like they’re out of money and looking for new investors. Maybe that’s just me.
Certainly has an agenda, electricity is expensive here, no way around it and this tries to pretend it’s not.
We have PG&E for the record
Posted on 12/27/17 at 5:45 am to crewdepoo
Do you’re saying you care about the environment?
Do you care about heavy metal pollution from processing and strip mining of the metals required to make the solar panels?
Do you care about the 1,000’s of hawks and eagles killed every year due to wind mills?
Do you care that it takes 1.2 gallons of diesel to produce one gallon of ethanol, which is only 3/4 as efficient as gas?
Probably not. You probably just want to do what “feels” good for the environment.
Do you care about heavy metal pollution from processing and strip mining of the metals required to make the solar panels?
Do you care about the 1,000’s of hawks and eagles killed every year due to wind mills?
Do you care that it takes 1.2 gallons of diesel to produce one gallon of ethanol, which is only 3/4 as efficient as gas?
Probably not. You probably just want to do what “feels” good for the environment.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 6:30 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Do you care about heavy metal pollution from processing and strip mining of the metals required to make the solar panels?
Metal will always be required by humans which is why it important to recycle metal and which it what frequently happens
quote:
Do you care about the 1,000’s of hawks and eagles killed every year due to wind mills?
This always makes me laugh
quote:
Wind turbines kill between 214,000 and 368,000 birds annually — a small fraction compared with the estimated 6.8 million fatalities from collisions with cell and radio towers and the 1.4 billion to 3.7 billion deaths from cats, according to the peer-reviewed study by two federal scientists and the environmental consulting firm West Inc.
This post was edited on 12/27/17 at 6:31 am
Posted on 12/27/17 at 6:43 am to TrueTiger
Accidental downvote.
Fat thumbed it on my phone.
Carry on.
Fat thumbed it on my phone.
Carry on.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 7:09 am to iPadThai
quote:
So I am assuming you are against mortgage interest deductions and long-term capital gains tax too? Because that is essentially the government choosing winners and trying to spur economic growth artificially?
No, this is government choosing survivors from the public that it is killing with its hugeness. Reduce government = reduced taxes = reduced deductions.
Talk about the kill-you-dead pollution created in the cheap production of Chinese solar panels that are actually reducing costs of not-so-green energy
Also, if we capture solar energy instead of letting it reflect back into space, are we not warming the globe?
Finally, the narrative that government subsidized the oil, coal, and natural gas industry is complete bull-shite. They were created and expanded without government influence. Sometimes to strategically stimulate them, their taxes were lowered. But they were NEVER subsidize like the kabillion dollar boondoggle of California’s Solyndra . Solyndra, another “green” success story where government picked winners (green investors and DNC donors) over losers (American tax payers).
Edit: Often downvoted seldom refuted.
This post was edited on 12/27/17 at 10:23 am
Posted on 12/27/17 at 7:44 am to crewdepoo
quote:
quote:
So let's reduce the earth's population to that of 100 years ago.
What does that have to do with anything? Still would have the same problems.
As long as he's the 1st in line for euthanasia ....every little bit helps!
Posted on 12/27/17 at 7:44 am to olddawg26
quote:
This board gets upset when something is good in clean energy and cheers when Tesla doesn’t make money. Can anyone explain that?
I just find it a little ironic how the left doesn't want drilling because it threatens the environment around it. They say drilling sights are an eyesore of our natural landscape and those landscape should remain pristine in nature and should be protected at all costs.
But lo and behold, let's remove the eyesore and threat of polluting the land by erecting thousands of windmills to coordinate with our pastoral scenes of natural American beauty.
There's more ways to pollute the scenic beauty of this country than by spilling some oil on it.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:03 am to rickgrimes
I like the idea of renewable energy, but the costs are just too high right now, especially for the poorer members of our society.
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:09 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Let green energy come naturally through the market.
Let consumers decide when they want to switch to green energy.
It isn't right to prop up ANY industry that consumers do not vote for with their wallets.
This...all of it......
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:26 am to rickgrimes
quote:
The price of solar power has dropped to under $30 in 2016 from around $136 per megawatt-hour in 2008, while wind power prices have fallen to $51 in 2015 from $97 per megawatt-hour in 2007, per the report.
Are we comparing apples to oranges?
How do those prices compare to fossil fuel or hydro generated electricity? How many tax dollars went to those jobs or subsidize the consumer bills?
quote:
Over the same period, the state has seen greenhouse-gas emissions from electricity generation decrease nearly every year.
So what?
Posted on 12/27/17 at 8:39 am to olddawg26
quote:You're not from an O&G state.
Can anyone explain that?
quote:The O&G and auto-industry stooges and stupid baws who want dem overpaid jobs irrationally lose their shite, but the rest of us realize that while there is a promising future for renewables, they are simply not cost effective for the average consumer at this time.
This board gets upset when something is good in clean energy and cheers when Tesla doesn’t make money.
What should happen is that alternative energy companies should compete and innovate to become more appealing to mainstream consumers. If the energy prices were merely competitive, it would be hugely popular. The only real motivation is financial, and when the government floats companies like it has been doing, they don't have the pressure of failure to motivate them.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News