- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaking: Susquehanna poll from PA
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:22 pm to John Barron
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:22 pm to John Barron
Trump closed exceptionally well at the end of October in both 2016 and 2020. If he's basically tied in September it means he is going to roll at the end of October and Kamala is cooked.
0
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:25 pm to Jwho77
quote:
These polls are always hilarious. McCormick is not running 8% behind compared to Trump.
Exactly. I could see if they had McCormick 3% or even 4% behind Trump, but 8%? That just doesn't make sense. Did McCormick kill a hooker or something that I missed?
This post was edited on 9/25/24 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:26 pm to John Barron
Did someone say Susquehanna? LINK
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:29 pm to tzimme4
Really need Trump's coattails to drag McCormick across the finish line. The difference between having 51 and 53+ GOP senators is MASSIVE as having 53+ neuters Collins and Murkowski.
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:33 pm to Fat Bastard
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:47 pm to GeneralLee
quote:
The difference between having 51 and 53+ GOP senators is MASSIVE as having 53+ neuters Collins and Murkowski.
I think we get the Ohio seat away from the dems. I just remember how the polls undervalued Vance during his Senate run, and he ended up winning +6.
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:53 pm to John Barron
Senate isn’t looking good anywhere though. Looks like we may get Trump as President but a D Congress
Seems every swing state poll has the senate candidate for Democrats way up
Seems every swing state poll has the senate candidate for Democrats way up
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:54 pm to deltaland
There will be an R senate.
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:55 pm to deltaland
quote:
Senate isn’t looking good anywhere though. Looks like we may get Trump as President but a D Congress
Seems every swing state poll has the senate candidate for Democrats way up
Still way too early to fret - we have legit shots in PA, WI, AZ and very likely wins in OH and MT (which gives us the Senate) plus JD's vote
I also seriously doubt the Dems optimism for winning the House. If Trump nearly wins the popular vote we'd likely be +15 at least
This post was edited on 9/25/24 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:56 pm to deltaland
GOP will likely have at least 52 GOP senators (WV + MT + OH). Not worried there.
House is going to razor thin as GOP is likely to lose several seats in the Long Island area.
Having a Trump presidency and 53+ GOP senators but then a Democratic House (by just one or two votes) would be so frustrating.
House is going to razor thin as GOP is likely to lose several seats in the Long Island area.
Having a Trump presidency and 53+ GOP senators but then a Democratic House (by just one or two votes) would be so frustrating.
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:56 pm to John Barron
It happens a lot but I just can't figure out why an electorate would vote for Trump and then for Casey. Concerning a desire for change in our country, doing so is counter productive.
Posted on 9/25/24 at 3:57 pm to SirWinston
Gallup says R+3. If so, "it isn't looking good" in bullshite polls won't mean a whole lot.
Posted on 9/25/24 at 4:00 pm to GeneralLee
I don't understand how we win the House in a midterm with no Trump but lose the house with Trump ginning up turnout and abortion not being as hot an issue as it was in 22
This post was edited on 9/25/24 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 9/25/24 at 4:04 pm to SirWinston
Not sure court cases have gone for us relative to redistricting. The dems likely get seats just based on Gerrymandering.
Posted on 9/25/24 at 4:07 pm to SirWinston
Want me to tell you what that’s about? It’s Republicans themselves, a certain type, who cause the phenomenon you described. Most instances could’ve and even would’ve resulted in Republican wins IF the aforementioned Republicans would all “circle the wagons” and vote eagerly regardless of whether the candidate is so-called MAGA or not. But the ones referenced above get it set in their minds to show that darned Donald Trump who’s boss and that he can’t just deebo his way around the joint. It’s been exactly enough in certain situations to sink the Republican candidate’s chances. That’s precisely what’s happened in too many cases and beware they might do it again. There are plenty examples here amongst us.
Posted on 9/25/24 at 5:36 pm to TDTOM
quote:
Warrior Court
I think he got banned.
Hope so. One of the most pretentious and sanctimonious assholes the board has seen in recent memory.
Posted on 9/25/24 at 5:46 pm to John Barron
They just measuring out how many fake ballots to print out for the win.
Posted on 9/25/24 at 5:50 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
Not sure court cases have gone for us relative to redistricting. The dems likely get seats just based on Gerrymandering.
Landry & the LA legislature rolled over to give the Dems an extra seat here. Should've kept suing as a federal judge doesn't have constitutional authority to draw districts or enforce them.
Posted on 9/25/24 at 5:50 pm to John Barron
quote:
Breaking:
I love when people use this term wrong. Good job
Posted on 9/25/24 at 5:57 pm to Fat Bastard
quote:
this is them
I thought that was Lonald Weiler Sledge and Rennis Renke
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News