- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BREAKING: Judge Cannon has denied DOJ's motion for a partial stay and has appointed Dearie
Posted on 9/15/22 at 7:45 pm to Decatur
Posted on 9/15/22 at 7:45 pm to Decatur
quote:
None of this is standard.
There have been a number of Special Master cases establishing precedent since Trump was elected. That you aren't aware of them and their potential relevance to this case is the least surprising thing I've read all day.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 7:47 pm to cajunangelle
quote:Did not kill herself.
Judge Cannon
Posted on 9/15/22 at 7:49 pm to TigerAttorney
quote:
What’s the word on him? Deep state scum? Or will he be pissed the Constitution was shite on and FISA Court lied to?
Been wondering the same. Trump picked him so can only assume (hope) he did some good vetting this time around. Fingers crossed he has learned.
I hope there is a way to get legal costs recouped on all of these witch hunts. maybe a new law can be put in place one day. Anything to help fight the feds overreach.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 7:54 pm to cajunangelle
Probably shite on Russia collusion hoax and Facebook interfering with the 2020 election.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 7:57 pm to KAGTASTIC
quote:
Been wondering the same. Trump picked him so can only assume (hope) he did some good vetting this time around. Fingers crossed he has learned.
You and I both know your entire opinion on this will hinge solely on whether he sides with or against Trump
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:06 pm to boosiebadazz
Interesting
quote:
The final FISA warrant against Page was then approved by Dearie on June 29, 2017, enabling 90 more days of surveillance against Page. Neither he nor the other judges who approved the surveillance held a hearing on it.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:13 pm to DingLeeBerry
quote:
Interesting
quote:
The final FISA warrant against Page was then approved by Dearie on June 29, 2017, enabling 90 more days of surveillance against Page. Neither he nor the other judges who approved the surveillance held a hearing on it
Think about it...
If this guy has a modicum of ethics or self respect, and sees docs that prove not only that he was duped, but consciously and intentionally duped...might just tilt the thinking
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:16 pm to cajunangelle
DOJ playing hide and seek, bigtime.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:29 pm to udtiger
quote:
If this guy has a modicum of ethics or self respect, and sees docs that prove not only that he was duped, but consciously and intentionally duped...might just tilt the thinking
I think that’s their angle.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:40 pm to cajunangelle
hope bill barr didn't swallow his tongue
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:52 pm to GumboPot
quote:
I don’t believe an interlocutory. ruling can be appealed.
Interlocutory discovery rulings can be appealed.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:53 pm to Hooligan's Ghost
quote:
hope bill barr didn't swallow his tongue
Speaking of Bill Barr; maybe Bret Baier can get Barr’s opinion on the matter so he can pimp more book sales.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 8:59 pm to roguetiger15
quote:
Trump has to pay costs for special master. Is that standard?
How much does he need? Got my part of the checkbook ready.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 9:19 pm to Hooligan's Ghost
quote:
swallow his tongue
... yeah, Mr. ruby ridge ...
You suck
the Weds. after Epstein offed himself , you appeared before congress with a cut under your left eye ...
BUT
That Thursday ...
I saw the rooftop guy, SO SORRY the power lines were in the way , plus I stood in the middle of the street and just waved ...
As I said ... you stuck
Posted on 9/15/22 at 9:25 pm to bayouvette
Then having read it is a given.
Them having read stuff which was subject to attorney client privilege, executive privilege, etc, and not having that separated out from the investigators kills any legal case out of this due to fruit of the poisoned tree.
While Schiff et all got to see some of what they wanted, this potentially blows up the whole fricking charade by making it impossible to indict Trump, which appears to be the threat they are trying to hold over him.
Them having read stuff which was subject to attorney client privilege, executive privilege, etc, and not having that separated out from the investigators kills any legal case out of this due to fruit of the poisoned tree.
While Schiff et all got to see some of what they wanted, this potentially blows up the whole fricking charade by making it impossible to indict Trump, which appears to be the threat they are trying to hold over him.
Posted on 9/15/22 at 9:46 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
The Court does not find it appropriate to accept the Government’s conclusions on these important and disputed issues without further review by a neutral third party in an expedited and orderly fashion."
Watch how quickly our nation's top law enforcement entities suddenly "lose" all the documents now.
"We're sorry, we are unable to locate the original, non-redacted papers. I think that was delegated to Jimmy on the fourth floor, but he committed suicide this morning via two shotgun blasts to the back of the head. Again, sorry for the very convenient inconvenience."
Posted on 9/15/22 at 10:28 pm to GumboPot
quote:
The probability of getting appealed is almost zero. I don’t believe an interlocutory ruling can be appealed.
An interlocutory ruling can be appealed with the trial court's consent. However, I'm not sure this isn't a final order. Trump hasn't really filed suit against the US. His "complsint" was just a motion asking for a special master and to stop review of the documents until the master was done. The Judge gave Trump what he asked for with slight modifications.
But I'm not an expert on Federal appeals.
I kind of think the DOJ would be better of not appealing. The judge ha ms ordered the SM to review the documents marked CLASSIFIED first and provide a recommendation. Also has allowed the DOJ to continue investigating storage and transfer of the docs, just not the docs themselves.
I think the classified docs should have been excluded from the ruling. There is no dispute over which documents were marked, and even if Trump declassified them, they cannot be considered his property or covered by privilege
Posted on 9/16/22 at 4:10 am to GumboPot
I was not aware that Judge Aileen took all documents off of the DOJ. Laura and yes I watched even Hannity last night said so.
Posted on 9/16/22 at 6:53 am to teke184
quote:
kills any legal case out of this due to fruit of the poisoned tree.
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/politics/fruit-of-the-poisonous-treewhat-if-everything-the-fbi-took-is-now-considered-this/103732304/
quote:
While Schiff et all got to see some of what they wanted, this potentially blows up the whole fricking charade by making it impossible to indict Trump, which appears to be the threat they are trying to hold over him.
Popular
Back to top



0










