re: Book shows Gen Milley committed treason. Grassley and Banks demand answers

You actually may be the dumbest piece of shite to frequent this board, and given the likes of Maograth and Celticprog, that is saying something.

quote:

---

Trump NEVER put national security at risk Milley, Obama, Biden do and did. Milley & Lloyd Austin and all JCS involved, Should be frog marched to the brig LIVE on TV in their fricking underwear.

---

Who promoted mark milley?

quote:

---

Milley is Obama residue.

---

Just about every POS top brass left in the Pentagon is obama's asswipe residue. He ran off most of the Patriots and replaced them with arse kissers like Milley and Austin.
It is the reason our military is more interested in not hurting the alphabet weirdos' feelings than being a battle ready fighting force.
Anyone joining the military at this point in time is either a fool, or is complicit with their fricked up ideals.

10 U.S. Code § 903b - Art. 103b. Aiding the enemy

10 U.S.C. § 888 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 10. Armed Forces § 888. Art. 88. Contempt toward officials

LINK

Desk jockey.

This thread seems to have attracted all the leftist whackos. They seem very upset. One would think someone prevented the abuse of an underage child or something

quote:

---

This thread seems to have attracted all the leftist whackos.

---

The Ukraine circle jerk thread on the OT isn't that active today, so Laketard and his buddies are over here posting today.

quote:

---

Lake boy and cwill need to give each other a reach around. What a couple of figs.

---

I remember when this was posted on the internet it was called

quote:

---

Obama’s Military Coup Purges 197 Officers In Five Years

Investors Business Daily, 10/29/2013

Defense: What the president calls “my military” is being cleansed of any officer suspected of disloyalty to or disagreement with the administration on matters of policy or force structure, leaving the compliant and fearful.

We recognize President Obama is the commander-in-chief and that throughout history presidents from Lincoln to Truman have seen fit to remove military commanders they view as inadequate or insubordinate. Turnover in the military ranks is normal, and in these times of sequestration and budget cuts the numbers are expected to tick up as force levels shrink and missions change.

Yet what has happened to our officer corps since President Obama took office is viewed in many quarters as unprecedented, baffling and even harmful to our national security posture. We have commented on some of the higher profile cases, such as Gen. Carter Ham. He was relieved as head of U.S. Africa Command after only a year and a half because he disagreed with orders not to mount a rescue mission in response to the Sept. 11, 2012, attack in Benghazi.

Rear Adm. Chuck Gaouette, commander of the John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group, was relieved in October 2012 for disobeying orders when he sent his group on Sept. 11 to “assist and provide intelligence for” military forces ordered into action by Gen. Ham.

Other removals include the sacking of two nuclear commanders in a single week — Maj. Gen. Michael Carey, head of the 20th Air Force, responsible for the three wings that maintain control of the 450 intercontinental ballistic missiles, and Vice Adm. Tim Giardina, the No. 2 officer at U.S. Strategic Command.

From Breitbart.com’s Facebook page comes a list of at least 197 officers that have been relieved of duty by President Obama for a laundry list of reasons and sometimes with no reason given. Stated grounds range from “leaving blast doors on nukes open” to “loss of confidence in command ability” to “mishandling of funds” to “inappropriate relationships” to “gambling with counterfeit chips” to “inappropriate behavior” to “low morale in troops commanded.”

Nine senior commanding generals have been fired by the Obama administration this year, leading to speculation by active and retired members of the military that a purge of its commanders is under way.

Retired U.S. Army Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, an outspoken critic of the Obama administration, notes how the White House fails to take action or investigate its own officials but finds it easy to fire military commanders “who have given their lives for their country.” Vallely thinks he knows why this purge is happening.

“Obama will not purge a civilian or political appointee because they have bought into Obama’s ideology,” Vallely said. “The White House protects their own. That’s why they stalled on the investigation into Fast and Furious, Benghazi and ObamaCare. He’s intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged.”

Another senior retired general told TheBlaze on the condition of anonymity, because he still provide services to the government and fears possible retribution, that “they’re using the opportunity of the shrinkage of the military to get rid of people that don’t agree with them or do not toe the party line. Remember, as (former White House chief of staff) Rahm Emanuel said, never waste a crisis.”

For President Obama, the military of a once-feared superpower is an anachronistic vestige of an America whose exceptionalism and world leadership require repeated apologies. It must be gutted and fundamentally transformed into a force wearing gender-neutral headgear only useful for holding the presidential umbrella when it rains. It is to be “his” military and used only for “his” purposes.

---

: