- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Boebert Doesn't Want to Meet With the King. Why? 1776, by Damn!
Posted on 4/16/26 at 6:33 pm to VOR
Posted on 4/16/26 at 6:33 pm to VOR
quote:
Our presidents (including Eisenhower, Nixon and Reagan) have had cordial relations with the Royal Family of our closest ally(that's what England is whether you like it or not)...
And our President now has a cordial relationship with the King. But why did you jump from the object of the interview (and object of the thread) right over to the topic of the history of our Presidents’ relationships with the Royal Family anyway??
Posted on 4/16/26 at 6:34 pm to VOR
quote:
Our presidents (including Eisenhower, Nixon and Reagan) have had cordial relations with the Royal Family of our closest ally(that's what England is whether you like it or not)...
I don't know if you've been paying attention lately, but Britain is certainly not our "closest ally" anymore.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 6:43 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
Practical, everyday, normal Americans understand exactly what Boebert meant, regardless of how many fricking King George's existed!
I understood what she meant. My point was that he didn't understand what he is asking. I thought it was obvious he was speaking about King Charles, the inbred's visit.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 9:03 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
She clearly didn’t know who was king. She’s all style, zero substance. She said 1776 though so woohoo!
She said 1776. And who was king in 1776?
She couldn't possibly be talking about the king from the time frame she just mentioned, could she?
Posted on 4/16/26 at 9:25 pm to VOR
quote:
closest ally(that's what England is whether you like it or not)...
You been under a rock for the past few years?
Posted on 4/16/26 at 11:13 pm to VOR
quote:
You can be America First and meet with the King as a courtesy.
Or you can be America first and not meet with the corrupt inbred as a gesture of patriotism to us.
Posted on 4/16/26 at 11:24 pm to AlwysATgr
Or because you simply don't want to. Why would anyone be obligated to meet the damn King of England? frick that guy. Monarchies are so ridiculous and archaic.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 12:08 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
She said 1776. And who was king in 1776?
She couldn't possibly be talking about the king from the time frame she just mentioned, could she?
The whole thing was a strange conversation.
I never did understand what the guy was originally asking her.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 12:14 am to AlterEd
That sounds like Chad Pergram asking the questions.
And dude is wearing a baseball hat.
And dude is wearing a baseball hat.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 12:40 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Sounds like Boebert fell right into his trap lol
once you realize the King in 1776 was King George, she dunked all over his face. Well, yours too. One of the few times I'd take the bullet for you.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 4:49 am to wackatimesthree
Exactly. Hard for kamala voters to comprehend.
Posted on 4/17/26 at 6:39 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
She clearly didn’t know who was king.
Who gives a shite.
That “King” wants cows to wear masks. He bc want to capture their farts too. He is a loon.
No wonder you love him.
Popular
Back to top

0







