Started By
Message

re: Beto O'Rourke leading Ted Cruz by 2 Points!

Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:07 pm to
Posted by Athis
I AM Charlie Kirk....
Member since Aug 2016
16984 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:07 pm to
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
198389 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:15 pm to
3 month ban from the board

Starting day after the election
This post was edited on 7/28/26 at 11:21 pm
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
11565 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:27 pm to
Maybe it’s you who is ill informed?

quote:

“I have been unusually quiet since the Texas House of Representatives sent the Senate articles of impeachment against the attorney general on very short notice in the final hours of the regular legislative session. The law requires the Senate to receive the articles and have a trial, and once I realized I would be the presiding officer and judge, I thought it was my duty to be quiet on this issue. I have done my very best to do so these last 3 months and these 2 weeks. I spent most of the last 90 days preparing for this trial. I have issued over 240 subpoenas, studied numerous motions, written multiple orders, read hundreds of pages of history, rules, and documents, and worked on every detail of this trial.

I feel it is important to set the full record straight for the future, so the full picture of what happened is known and how it was we got here.

“In the House, the vote to send articles of impeachment against the attorney general to the Senate happened very quickly, with virtually no time for 150 members to study the 20 articles. The Speaker and his team rammed through the first impeachment of a statewide-elected official in Texas in over 100 years while paying no attention to the precedent.

“In the past, the target of the investigation was notified and invited to attend with counsel and given the opportunity to cross examine witnesses that were placed under oath before testimony was taken. At the conclusion of past House investigations, the evidence was laid out for weeks for House members to evaluate before they took their vote on articles of impeachment.

“Rep. John Smithee, a long-time House member, spoke on the House Floor during the impeachment vote in May. He was one of only 23 who voted against impeachment. Rep. Smithee said that the House could not legitimately impeach AG Paxton on the record because there was no record to send to the Senate. He said the House was not following the rule of law, and he said the House approach was, and I quote: “Hang ’em now and judge them later.”

Rep. Andrew Murr, the Chair of the House Investigating Committee, said on the House floor: “This [The House] is not the body that does the fact finding, the fact-finding occurs in the Senate and oath for any witness would occur there.”

“That is just not true. As Rep. Smithee said, the last House impeachment of a statewide-elected official, in 1917 of Gov. Ferguson, was conducted like a full trial in the House before it was sent to the Senate. Witnesses were put under oath and cross examined by the defendant. Rep. Smithee said this time, no House witnesses were put under oath and the defendant was denied the right to cross examine. Rep. Smithee told his fellow members the House process was indefensible and that the House did not follow the rules of evidence and their case was based on triple hearsay that would never be allowed in court.



Any testimony given in a House impeachment investigation must be given under oath and the target must be allowed to be present with a lawyer to cross examine the witnesses. Otherwise, people can say anything without any accountability or need to be truthful because there is no threat of perjury.

“The House must also give all House members a minimum of 2 weeks to review all evidence given under oath before voting on such a serious matter. Had they done these two things in May, this trial may never have happened.


“We owe it to future legislatures to make these changes so that no future official impeached by the House, whether Republican, Democrat, or Independent, is subjected to the way this impeachment process occurred.

“Millions of taxpayer dollars have been wasted on this impeachment. 31 Senators and a large Senate staff that made this trial possible have put their family life, jobs, and businesses on hold for 3 months after being here already from January to June.

“An impeachment should never happen again in the House like it happened this year.”
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
159417 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:33 pm to
I don't make ban bets, but if Paxton loses I will publicly apologize for calling you a fat Mexican phag retard




which I have never done




Until now
Posted by DeBoar
Member since Jan 2024
5417 posts
Posted on 7/28/26 at 11:43 pm to
quote:

wanna bet?


You’ll just post on your other accounts
Posted by Shamoan
Member since Feb 2019
14240 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 12:08 am to
It’s over…
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57793 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 4:51 am to
quote:

In the House, the vote to send articles of impeachment against the attorney general to the Senate happened very quickly, with virtually no time for 150 members to study the 20 articles. The Speaker and his team rammed through the first impeachment of a statewide-elected official in Texas in over 100 years while paying no attention to the precedent.

This is a reasonable attack on the process that occurred in the House. It says nothing about the case against Paxton.
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
16413 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 4:59 am to
quote:

am confident because the democratic is unelectable


So was Joe Biden at least 50% of all democrats in Congress, yet here we are.

Some human beings actually voted for Jasmine Crockett and Al Green.

We are not a serious nation.
Posted by tarzana
TX Hwy 6-- the Brazos River Valley
Member since Sep 2015
32935 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 7:34 am to
:snore::snore: TL;DR

Paxton is history, after he loses the Senate race. Good riddance
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
14011 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 7:37 am to
"Ted Cruz Campaign: Raised $45.7 million and spent $45.6 million.Beto O'Rourke Campaign: Raised a record-breaking $80.3 million and spent $80 million.Despite being heavily outspent by O'Rourke—who raised nearly $35 million more than the incumbent—Cruz ultimately won the election by a narrow 2.6 percentage points. Note that these figures reflect individual candidate committee spending reported to the Federal Election Commission (FEC) and do not include millions more spent by independent outside political action committees (PACs) on behalf of both sides."

They hate it when they're wrong.
Posted by bostitch
Member since Apr 2016
822 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 7:51 am to
quote:

Cruz's next stop should be a seat on the Supreme Court



Nah. Maybe run for a seat at the Knesset or get on at the Bagatz
Posted by Midtiger farm
Member since Nov 2014
6399 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 7:55 am to
quote:


Paxton is history, after he loses the Senate race. Good riddance


lol
the best pollsters who are very bearish on the GOP's chances right now are saying Paxton is whipping gay boy's arse right now
Won't be even close
the mexicans and blacks aren't going to show up for Talarico
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
69728 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 7:57 am to
If Talarico wins will it be because of massive fraud by illegal Indian and Muslim voters?
Posted by dickkellog
little rock
Member since Dec 2024
3476 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 7:58 am to
texas tribune is a joke
Posted by onepiecemayne
Member since Nov 2023
1318 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 8:02 am to
If Talarico wins, it's because Republicans let him win. They chose the most corrupt candidate possibly bc Orange Lord said so. They could have nominated a trash can and it would have no problem winning.
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
14011 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 8:05 am to
Cornyn had to go.
Posted by Larry_Hotdogs
Texas
Member since Jun 2019
2155 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 8:33 am to
quote:

Not sure why you guys are so confident

Because the other guy is Talarico.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24739 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 8:35 am to
Cruz should consider retiring. My 70 year old self believes changes are coming to the Republican Party. It's going to take a new type of republican politician to fight the other side. Time for change.

Addendum: We are taking in so many new residents in this state, it will eventually Californify and Coloradofy until it completely changes. Texas is supposed to the be the largest state in the country by population by the end of the century. You know what that means.
This post was edited on 7/29/26 at 8:38 am
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
39352 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 8:44 am to
That bag of estrogen ia still around?
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
52861 posts
Posted on 7/29/26 at 9:00 am to
quote:

Cruz should consider retiring.
Maybe an opportunity to place him on SCOTUS will come up. As an actual attorney with experience working for a Supreme Court justice and as a practicing attorney skilled in Constitutional law, he would be uniquely qualified which, as I see it, would be a nice offset to the completely unqualified Elena Kagen, who was never a judge, never practiced law but only taught law at Harvard. And we see the current state of Harvard Law, if that tells you anything.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram