- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Australian broadcaster humiliates climate zealots
Posted on 5/19/24 at 6:41 am
Posted on 5/19/24 at 6:41 am
Posted on 5/19/24 at 7:24 am to Geekboy
And not a lie was said (at least by him).
The questions I have are…
1. Why the war on farmers?
2. What is being done to address the oxygen “poisoning” being done to our plant life globally (as Carbon Dioxide is reduced)?
3. Who is behind this false narrative of catastrophism known as climate change?
4. What is the end goal?
The questions I have are…
1. Why the war on farmers?
2. What is being done to address the oxygen “poisoning” being done to our plant life globally (as Carbon Dioxide is reduced)?
3. Who is behind this false narrative of catastrophism known as climate change?
4. What is the end goal?
Posted on 5/19/24 at 7:43 am to Geekboy
“Alice” on stage with him acts so typical leftist in her efforts to avoid facts and accountability. Doesn’t want to talk about facts as she has none.
Posted on 5/19/24 at 7:45 am to weptiger
quote:
“Alice” on stage with him acts so typical leftist in her efforts to avoid facts and accountability. Doesn’t want to talk about facts as she has none.
Prior to him owning her with a simple question, she was dismissive and condescending. She is a good little goose-stepper.
Posted on 5/19/24 at 7:55 am to weptiger
Posted on 5/19/24 at 7:58 am to Geekboy
You saw that cow sitting next to him. When presented with facts, they stick their heads in the sand and say I’m not a scientist. They don’t care about facts.
Posted on 5/19/24 at 9:34 am to Geekboy
It’s about grifting me harder
Posted on 5/19/24 at 9:43 am to Geekboy
The Dutch farmers are pissed, too. But the angle is different. The Netherlands has more forest land than Australia. Forests love CO2. So, the environmentalists claim the farmers are creating too much nitrogen and they're being shut down. Who needs food anyway?
Posted on 5/19/24 at 9:46 am to Geekboy
For those who didn't watch, his points were that:
*.04% of the atmosphere is made up of CO2
*humans are responsible for 3%
*of that 3%, Australia is responsible for 1%
The alarmist clergy attempt to counterpoint that the 3% is actually ~33%, except what they are saying is that the amount has increased by 33% since 1850 and that humans are responsible for all of it. Another counterpoint is the percentage in the atmosphere isn't the important point, but rather that the total amount is the point.
All that said, what's interesting is that when you dig down into molecular heat-trapping, sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) beats the shite out of CO2. SF6 traps around 22,000 times more heat than CO2 and has a far longer lifespan. SF6 occurs at only 1 part per trillion, but it has been steadily increasing over the years.
Unlike CO2 though, SF6 is completely man-made (it doesn't naturally occur). What's it's primary use? To insulate electrical parts and switch the flow of current, meaning it's also used in wind turbines.
In a nutshell, the single most heat-trapping greenhouse gas in the world is man-made and used primarily for the electrical expansion that the green crowd is saying will save us from overheating the atmosphere with greenhouse gasses.
*.04% of the atmosphere is made up of CO2
*humans are responsible for 3%
*of that 3%, Australia is responsible for 1%
The alarmist clergy attempt to counterpoint that the 3% is actually ~33%, except what they are saying is that the amount has increased by 33% since 1850 and that humans are responsible for all of it. Another counterpoint is the percentage in the atmosphere isn't the important point, but rather that the total amount is the point.
All that said, what's interesting is that when you dig down into molecular heat-trapping, sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) beats the shite out of CO2. SF6 traps around 22,000 times more heat than CO2 and has a far longer lifespan. SF6 occurs at only 1 part per trillion, but it has been steadily increasing over the years.
Unlike CO2 though, SF6 is completely man-made (it doesn't naturally occur). What's it's primary use? To insulate electrical parts and switch the flow of current, meaning it's also used in wind turbines.
In a nutshell, the single most heat-trapping greenhouse gas in the world is man-made and used primarily for the electrical expansion that the green crowd is saying will save us from overheating the atmosphere with greenhouse gasses.
Posted on 5/19/24 at 10:13 am to Geekboy
Because Climate Change is a SCAM, just like Covid, Ukraine and Global Warming.
Democrats cannot exist without SCAMS. Next in line, Bird Flu.
Democrats cannot exist without SCAMS. Next in line, Bird Flu.
Posted on 5/19/24 at 10:13 am to Geekboy
Carbon dioxide is NOT a pollutant. It is a trace atmospheric gas REQUIRED for life as we know it to exist on this planet.
If anything, a little too little CO2 would be a much bigger problem than a little too much.
If anything, a little too little CO2 would be a much bigger problem than a little too much.
Posted on 5/19/24 at 10:20 am to weptiger
quote:
“Alice” on stage with him acts so typical leftist in her efforts to avoid facts and accountability. Doesn’t want to talk about facts as she has none.
She’s doing what leftists do, which is using emotion instead of logic. In this case she does the silly dismissive laugh.
Posted on 5/19/24 at 12:04 pm to Marquesa
I am a climate change skeptic with a long history of battling the nonsensical government mandates and subsidies. But posting this chart as prima facie evidence against climate chance is severely stupid.
That 0.04% slice of CO2 looks small, but that doesn’t mean it can’t be impactful. The same size slice of H2S - 0.04% in air will cause you to collapse within five minutes.
Posted on 5/19/24 at 12:11 pm to Penrod
quote:
That 0.04% slice of CO2 looks small, but that doesn’t mean it can’t be impactful.
True.
It needs to be a larger slice.
Posted on 5/19/24 at 12:14 pm to Geekboy
That's pretty rare coming from one of the biggest globalist-appeasing states in the free world
Posted on 5/19/24 at 12:18 pm to weptiger
quote:
“Alice” on stage with him acts so typical leftist in her efforts to avoid facts and accountability. Doesn’t want to talk about facts as she has none
I love how leftists like her vomit out their opinions like they are gospel and refuse to even look at proof that they are wrong.
And when called out on it, their response is “well, I’m not a scientist”. Basically admitting that they have aabsolutely no clue about the subject they are arguing for.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News