Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Anyone annoyed that almost all news sites got rid of comment sections?

Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:13 pm
Posted by willymeaux
Member since Mar 2012
4755 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:13 pm
CNN, MSNBC, BBC are ones I've noticed got rid of their comment section. Fox News and ABC still have theirs for now. I like reading other peoples reaction to some of these "bombshell" articles. Are more news sites doing this to stop people calling out their BS????
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69313 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:14 pm to
Comment sections were shitshows
Posted by wareaglepete
Lumon Industries
Member since Dec 2012
11011 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:15 pm to
Those comments sections were worse cesspools than Twitter, but they were funny to read.
Posted by MrLSU
Yellowstone, Val d'isere
Member since Jan 2004
25999 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:15 pm to
The media is taking them down because people's unsolicited factual comments often interfere with the agenda of the article.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79230 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:16 pm to
Local news stations are only occupied by trolls and dumb people. They should stop comments on there as well IMO.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:16 pm to
More and more sites are either limiting consumer commentary (NYT heavily moderates theirs now, for instance) or eliminating it altogether. It's a pity. I always enjoyed the comments as much as the articles. Most of it was a bunch of tomfoolery, but goddamn was it funny. And we got the occasional insight.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

The media is taking them down because people's unsolicited factual comments often interfere with the agenda of the article.
They're being taken down because they're overrun with basic arse trolling. Generally by a bunch of maladjusted white boys. I enjoyed it for years, believe me. But it's easier to just take it down than to have to over-moderate.

Just saying.
Posted by Vecchio Cane
Ivory Tower
Member since Jul 2016
17762 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:21 pm to
I think it was the "marketing" scams that ruined everything. I enjoyed all the comments on both sides, but every other post became "I made x amount of $, Ask me how"
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

but every other post became "I made x amount of $, Ask me how"
That, too. Still see it on politico occasionally.
Posted by airlinehwypanhandler
Airline Highway
Member since Feb 2019
2130 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

The media is taking them down because people's unsolicited factual comments often interfere with the agenda of the article.



This is the main reason. Too many people would scroll to the comments and see the commenters agenda didn't align with the agenda of the article. ESPN is probably Exhibit A here. How many times did their SJW laced articles have nothing but comments opposing it?

Comment sections actually drive traffic to sites, so it was not in these sites best interests to get rid of them.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23738 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:25 pm to
Don’t feed the trolls.
Posted by Samso
nyc
Member since Jun 2013
4730 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:26 pm to
WSJ just did this. They still have comment sections but only on select articles.

Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
7755 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:33 pm to
quote:

The media is taking them down because people's unsolicited factual comments often interfere with the agenda of the article.



This and only this. My view is that an article (especially an editorial) that does not open itself up to reader comments is not worth reading. I remember during the Olympics one year a runner from the UK either won or medaled in the marathon. He was an immigrant from the third world, and there was a glowing article about the importance and benefits of this kind of immigration. It wasn't until you read the comments that you learned that he had family members that were involved in various serious crimes in the UK. It certainly shed a different light on the situation. The writer of the article either didn't bother to find that out, or he knew it and intentionally left it out of the article. I don't know which is worse.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118862 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:34 pm to
Add the dissenter extension to your browser and you can comment on any article you'd like through GAB.
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
118862 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

The media is taking them down because people's unsolicited factual comments often interfere with the agenda of the article.


If the media were honest brokers they would welcome dissent.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164275 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 4:57 pm to
My favorite comment section of all time is when LSUsports dot net had one for their articles. LSU had a horrendous April and May in baseball in 2010 and when they went through their losing streak only one guy would comment on the articles shitting all over and ripping the team in long paragraphs. Sometimes his son would even chime in with additional comments.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37125 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 5:42 pm to
nola.com seems to be "closing" the comments section a lot more often - many times as soon as an article is published.

Part of the problem is - sometimes like this website - the comment section often devolves into personal attacks and complaining. If we as humans could have an intelligent discussion with each other, it would be much easier.
Posted by Dead End
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
21237 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 5:43 pm to
They can't handle people disagreeing with their propaganda.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46152 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 5:48 pm to
quote:

The media is taking them down because people's unsolicited factual comments often interfere with the agenda of the article.


This ^^^^ is exactly what it is. Usually some conservative with some substantive rebuttal derails the Prog/Dim circle jerk and the admins have to intervene on behalf of the SJWs.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram