- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anti AR15 people: How is the AR15 functionally different than any other semiauto rifle?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:26 pm to Covingtontiger77
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:26 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
Would be interesting on here to have those so in favor of don’t you take my rights away after they have had a loved one or family friend killed this way.
Bet the tune would change in heartbeat. Anyone that says otherwise is full of shite.
I had a relative killed in the school shooting in Erfurt, Germany. And I will never support a weapons ban of any kind, for any reason.
So take your holier-than-thou attitude and shove it up your arse dude.
0
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:28 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:By who?
I’m just not afraid to criticize the bastardization of it.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:28 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
Are we going to ban belt loops and wooden fowls too?
ETA: I have no problem banning bumpstocks themselves but it won’t accomplish what you want it to.
ETA: I have no problem banning bumpstocks themselves but it won’t accomplish what you want it to.
This post was edited on 2/19/18 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:29 pm to GeorgeTheGreek
quote:
Where does everyone land on bump stocks?
Eh, using semi auto would be more accurate.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:29 pm to Covingtontiger77
How has it been bastardized?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:30 pm to winston318
quote:
It's the popularity of the AR-15. If you can take away the most popular weapon involved in these shootings it will be easier for them to get rid of the rest of them
Based on what information?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:32 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
"all guns should be banned".
Except those held by cops because- wait, no, BLACK LIVES MATTER!
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:32 pm to Jbird
Judges in present time wherein they read a document written over 200 yrs ago where the possibility of such firepower could not be conceived and apply its verbiage to present day.
Muskets, swords and cannons - not the same as present day weaponary, agree?
Muskets, swords and cannons - not the same as present day weaponary, agree?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:34 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
Muskets, swords and cannons - not the same as present day weaponary, agree?
Exactly. I should only be able to buy weapons that were available during the founders time.
SO, giant bombs (used in sieges) grape shot canisters capable of killing a hundred people in a shot, and my very own warship are completely acceptable.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:34 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:Link to that distorted document claiming these as the only weapons covered by said document?
Muskets, swords and cannons - not the same as present day weaponary, agree?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:35 pm to cokebottleag
Why can’t you also have some nuclear material in order to make a dirty bomb?
NO LIMIT SOLDIER! Make em day ahhhh
NO LIMIT SOLDIER! Make em day ahhhh
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:36 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:
cannons
So you're saying we should be allowed to have cannons and equivalent explosives?
SWEET!
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:36 pm to Covingtontiger77
You realize there were firearms back then that weren’t single shot right?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:36 pm to Centinel
Get one. Protect your family bro
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:37 pm to Covingtontiger77
quote:Says the guy ragging on distorting a document.
Why can’t you also have some nuclear material in order to make a dirty bomb?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:38 pm to BACONisMEATcandy
quote:
You realize there were firearms back then that weren’t single shot right?
You're talking to the dude who thinks ARs should be banned but a Mini-14 is perfectly fine to own.
He's clueless.
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:38 pm to Covingtontiger77
I also assume you’d say freedom of speech shouldn’t apply to the internet and freedom of the press shouldn’t apply to TV, Radio, and the internet.
And the 4th amendment should not apply to cars, phones, computers, etc....
And the 4th amendment should not apply to cars, phones, computers, etc....
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:38 pm to Jbird
What’s so funny?!?! Someone may need that to have their Militia in order to protect their family and or against govt tyranny.
Who the frick does the govt think they are limiting me on what i can purchase to protect mine? F em
I want nuclear capability
Who the frick does the govt think they are limiting me on what i can purchase to protect mine? F em
I want nuclear capability
This post was edited on 2/19/18 at 1:40 pm
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:39 pm to Covingtontiger77
How many AR’s do you think there are in the US and how many have been used in mass shootings?
Posted on 2/19/18 at 1:39 pm to weagle99
Because they’re scary looking and people are used to seeing the full auto version in war movies.
People are idiots to be succinct
People are idiots to be succinct
Page 5 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News