- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:40 am to Placekicker
It's official, the activist democrat judges are running a "shield the crook" scheme. The corrupt democrat lawyers (now judges) have corrupted our Justice System.
Standing up against these thieves? One Donald John Trump.
Trump 2025 - They're really after you - I'm just standing in the way.
Standing up against these thieves? One Donald John Trump.
Trump 2025 - They're really after you - I'm just standing in the way.
This post was edited on 11/25/25 at 11:55 am
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:45 am to Placekicker
Since when can a judge overturn a jury’s verdict? They have discretion on sentencing within the constraints of the law broken but I’ve never heard a judge overruling a verdict
What’s the point of a jury if a judge can do this? Does this mean a judge can overrule a not guilty verdict?
What’s the point of a jury if a judge can do this? Does this mean a judge can overrule a not guilty verdict?
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:48 am to Placekicker
I hope very bad things happen to them all. Very bad things.
So sick of this bullshite.
So sick of this bullshite.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:51 am to Placekicker
Women should not be allowed to vote, much less be Judges.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:55 am to Placekicker
It is obvious that we have hardcore leftist operatives embedded within the judiciary.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:56 am to Placekicker
She's probably running for some office in 26' and knows this will get her a leg up in Minnesota and with Democraps.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:58 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
This is just more legal nonsense. All the documentation proved there was fraud in the business and his brother had his name all over. The one they tried, the actual owner did not, even though he was spending money like a king. Had they taken the time to show the money from the business to the owner, not just the fraud itself, they would have convicted him.
Total bullshite, but I see the judge's view from a legal standpoint.
Generally speaking a Judge cannot overturn a jury verdict, they can issue a Judgement Notwithstanding the Verdict if the Judge determines that no reasonable jury could reach a verdict based on the evidence given (this is not the case here). If there are procedural errors the Judge can order a new trial.
ETA: Keep in mind that a Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict is rarely given. Judges tend to show respect to the jury in this regard.
This post was edited on 11/25/25 at 12:02 pm
Posted on 11/25/25 at 8:58 pm to Placekicker
Posted on 11/25/25 at 8:59 pm to Kjnstkmn
Posted on 11/25/25 at 9:04 pm to mtntiger
quote:
How can the judge simply overturn a jury's unanimous verdict?
By ruling that no reasonable jury could have come to the conclusion it did, and that they made a mistake of fact, law, or both. The decision will get reviewed in appellate court.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 9:07 pm to Masterag
Posted on 11/25/25 at 9:15 pm to Kjnstkmn
Posted on 11/25/25 at 9:18 pm to Placekicker
I hear Somalis are inbred; true?..
Posted on 11/25/25 at 9:54 pm to Jbird
Posted on 11/25/25 at 10:43 pm to Kjnstkmn
Somalia looks nicer than MN, so no need to worry about sending them back to such a utopia.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 2:15 am to Kjnstkmn
Remember when they said the skyrocketing autism might be related to skyrocketing costs of "treating" autism?????
Trinidad remembers.
Just about the time the "spectrum" of autism was invented.
Trinidad remembers.
Just about the time the "spectrum" of autism was invented.
This post was edited on 11/26/25 at 2:17 am
Posted on 11/26/25 at 4:24 am to Placekicker
She looks like she is 12.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 4:55 am to BugAC
quote:Let's start with the obvious. Medicaid fraud is bad. Despite the usual posts asserting that anyone not calling for a lynching of both the judge and the defenant somehow supports medicaid fraud.
Every liberal alive supports this. Don't let them fool you to pretend they don't. They love judicial activism at the expense of the American citizen.
So, what actually happened here, since it is clear that the usual suspects did not actually read about the case.
In a nutshell, the judge ruled that there WAS fraud, but that the fraud was committed by the defendant's brother, rather than the defendant.
Posted on 11/26/25 at 4:57 am to mtntiger
quote:Is this a serious question?
How can the judge simply overturn a jury's unanimous verdict?
The Anglo-American jury system has included judgments non obstante veredicto for centuries.
Popular
Back to top



0






