re: ACLJ Obtains Obama DOJ’s Immunity Agreements with Hillary’s Lawyers and it's damning

quote:

---

Don't be naive.

---

I'm not being naive. Just wondering if anything can legally be done to the people who gave her immunity

If this is the truth, I'm more convinced now than ever that we need a hard reset country wide.

We need to know who gave them that deal and what they got in exchange. Who did they testify against? What did they do in exchange? If nothing..if this was just so they could destroy evidence as it appears...the whole bunch should be prosecuted.

If they got said deal and no one was prosecuted or no case was made against anyone..I would say that deal could be revoked and some folks should be in a lot of trouble.

I really wish publications wouldn’t use imagery like this. It looks like something a parody website would use.

quote:

---

I'm no lawyer, but I don't think what they did was illegal. If it's able to be placed in a larger context as part if the Barr investigation, it could be used as damning evidence in the court of public opinion but the media will do everything in their power to dismiss it.

---

In the context of a larger RICO enterprise the prosecutors were in on the continuing act of covering up the conspiracy for which the original conspirators were given blanket immunity to help cover up the original RICO conspiracy. The prosecutors weren't given immunity though so that's where you start dropping the charges so that this won't happen again otherwise you are inviting the DOJ & FBI and other agencies to engage in illegal conduct by allowing it to be covered up for decades.

quote:

---

I'm not being naive. Just wondering if anything can legally be done to the people who gave her immunity

---

Immunity deals can be thrown out if it's proven the person lied or did something that breaches the contract of the deal.

The immunity deals are supposed to be precisely that, contracts with terms that must be met in order to receive the immunity.

Breaching this contract can cause the whole deal to be tossed out.

Hopefully someone is looking at those deals right now trying to figure out if terms of the deals were met.

quote:

---

I'm no lawyer either, but an immunity deal to obstruct justice, cover up a coup, or hide treason should be invalidated.

---

I agree, but it's kind of hard for the DOJ to tell Mills and Samuelson (plus their computer tech guy and 2 other people), "Go ahead and erase emails, bleechbit the server, and smash your laptops, ipads, and cell phones because we're going to give you immunity.", and then turn around and throw out the immunity deals and then prosecute them for destroying evidence.

Maybe they can be prosecuted for conspiracy and obstruction if they admitted to knowing immunity was being granted so they could purposely destroy evidence, but I doubt they'd admit that.

There has to be recourse somewhere though. How do you not know that destroying evidence is illegal? Just because the DOJ says you can do it, how do you not know in the back of your mind that it can't possibly be ethical and within the law to do it?

So I don't know. This is insane though.

quote:

---

Immunity deals can be thrown out if it's proven the person lied or did something that breaches the contract of the deal.

---

If Hillary didn't lie, then there would be no breach of contract. But what about if all the nefarious activity was going on at the other side of the table? Can they really be held liable for granting immunity in bad faith? Doesn't that require a shitload of evidence to prove their intent?