Started By
Message

re: ACLJ Obtains Obama DOJ’s Immunity Agreements with Hillary’s Lawyers and it's damning

Posted on 7/30/19 at 12:32 pm to
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 7/30/19 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

If Hillary didn't lie, then there would be no breach of contract. But what about if all the nefarious activity was going on at the other side of the table? Can they really be held liable for granting immunity in bad faith? Doesn't that require a shitload of evidence to prove their intent?
I would think so too.

But also think about it like this...

What if a DA said "Go ahead and murder that person (our political enemy), I won't prosecute you. You'll be granted immunity."

I'm pretty sure you knew the murder is illegal and the immunity deal was done on the basis of corrupt criminal intent.

Is smashing evidence with a hammer and using 3rd party programs to destroy hard drives to delete evidence equivalent to murder? Of course not, but is it easy common knowledge that it's illegal? Absolutely.

So there's gotta be some kind of recourse here.
This post was edited on 7/30/19 at 12:34 pm
Posted by skinny domino
sebr
Member since Feb 2007
14523 posts
Posted on 7/30/19 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

ACLJ Obtains Obama DOJ’s Immunity Agreements with Hillary’s Lawyers to ‘Dispose of Evidence and Refuse to
Gateway pundit with the boom beep...
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138925 posts
Posted on 7/30/19 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

What if a DA said "Go ahead and murder that person, I won't prosecute you. You'll be granted immunity."

But they don't grant immunity for future crimes
quote:

Is smashing evidence with a hammer and using 3rd party programs to destroy hard drives to delete evidence equivalent to murder? Of course not, but is it easy common knowledge that it's illegal? Absolutely.

What info did they get from the interview that was worth the immunity?
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 7/30/19 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

But they don't grant immunity for future crimes
They seemingly did it indirectly in this case simply by working around the chronology.

They subpoena'd everyone, and then told them it was okay to destroy shite, scrub laptops, and bleechbit hard drives, and THEN handed them immunity for ???, and included the destroying of evidence in the subsequent immunity deal.

quote:

What info did they get from the interview that was worth the immunity?
Nobody knows.

Comey was drafting the exoneration letter 2 months before interviewing any of these people, including Hillary.

Comey also held a press conference where he listed out 10 instances of crimes being committed by Hillary, but then said there was no intent so no prosecutor would charge her.

Maybe one/some of those 10 instances of crimes were revealed by the 5 aids/associates who were given immunity?
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
17965 posts
Posted on 7/30/19 at 1:20 pm to
How do you fight this level of corruption? This is unbelievable.

FWIW, this is why I don’t condemn Julian Assange and Wikileaks.
This post was edited on 7/30/19 at 1:23 pm
Posted by StrangeBrew
Salvation Army-Thanks Obama
Member since May 2009
18368 posts
Posted on 7/30/19 at 2:27 pm to
Incoming Hannity Tic Tock
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
9283 posts
Posted on 7/30/19 at 3:20 pm to
Comey- "I am granting you immunity. Now, PLEASE destroy your laptops so that I don't find anything that would incrminate HRC. We will call it a matter."
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram