- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: About this ballroom
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:10 am to j1897
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:10 am to j1897
quote:
I don't feel the need to capitalize fictional books. That said, the term "luxury" is fundamentally incompatible with jesus' teachings. You can skew your logic however you like, but deep down you know i'm right.
Why use a religious argument if you find it fictional?
And... just so ya know, even the titles of works of fiction are capitalized. You intentionally failed to do so because you stink.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:10 am to VOR
Let’s talk about the hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars that have been stolen
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:11 am to j1897
quote:
I don't feel the need to capitalize fictional books
Total clown.
ETA:
quote:
That said, the term "luxury" is fundamentally incompatible with jesus' teachings. You can skew your logic however you like, but deep down you know i'm right.
Completely false.
This post was edited on 5/20/26 at 10:12 am
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:11 am to SallysHuman
quote:yep
Why use a religious argument if you find it fictional?
quote:body bagged
And... just so ya know, even the titles of works of fiction are capitalized. You intentionally failed to do so because you stink.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:12 am to VOR
quote:
The suggestion that it's necessary for White House security is obviously bullshite.
It's 6 stories deep. With all kinds of shite in it. Do you really think it's for dancing and raves? I am not a fan of a lot going on with Trump this term, but it should be somewhat concerning to you that Trump feels this is so important that he wants it done before he's out of office. That's my take, anyway.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:13 am to VOR
You care about a ballroom but not gender mutilation, millions of illegal immigrants, or the FBI trying to frame a President they didn’t like lol you are the most naive fool I have ever seen on this board. Doddering old man yammering about nonsense
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:15 am to VOR
There are a million other things more important than this ballroom. I’m honestly shocked it’s become such an issue
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:15 am to VOR
quote:
Can anyone actually justify spending billions on such a ghastly looking project?
Which project? The ballroom is being privately funded.
You may find it ghastly, but it is not the first time nor will it be the last time a President modifies the White House.
quote:
The suggestion that it's necessary for White House security is obviously bullshite.
Not really. Large events are now held outside the White House. This gives a more secure area to house these events.
quote:
So much for using taxpayer money wisely (the "private donors" aren't covering the tab)
Private donors are covering the ballroom tab. Now if you would like to talk about the underground portion, then do so, but keep it separate.
This post was edited on 5/20/26 at 10:16 am
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:18 am to VOR
At a time when our national debt to gdp ratio screams to cut costs on government spending, a gigantic gaudy ballroom, amounts to fiddling while DC burns….
And even if every dime is paid for by private “donors”, it’s a slap in the face to conservatives minded folks who object to our government selling out. This just invites manipulation.
I hated when Clinton and Obama sold out the White House. I hated when Biden sold access to Ukraine or anyone who would pay for his son’s shakedown demands. I hate this too.
I didn’t vote for this.
And even if every dime is paid for by private “donors”, it’s a slap in the face to conservatives minded folks who object to our government selling out. This just invites manipulation.
I hated when Clinton and Obama sold out the White House. I hated when Biden sold access to Ukraine or anyone who would pay for his son’s shakedown demands. I hate this too.
I didn’t vote for this.
This post was edited on 5/20/26 at 10:21 am
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:19 am to DesScorp
Is that Seinfield's "Kramer" in the middle?
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:21 am to VOR
I get such a kick out of people like you. So at up with TDS, Trump could cure cancer and you’d find fault.
Trump won’t even get to use the ballroom until his third term and you’re bitching about it.
Trump won’t even get to use the ballroom until his third term and you’re bitching about it.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:21 am to j1897
It would “sicken” Jesus Christ lol sure thing Sandra. But you know what would? Christians who can’t quote or even apply a single scripture, political leaders who believe it’s ok to and encourage other children to change their gender, millions of aborted babies since Roe v Wade, importing millions of non believers who are diametrically opposed to the teachings of Jesus, relying on the government for your needs not God, rampant homosexuality in Hollywood and Washington, and I could keep going but then again you believe a ballroom is on the list of issues that are truly important
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:21 am to SlidellCajun
The alternative to this would be much much worse. There’s two choices unfortunately and you’re not going to like the other guys.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:22 am to SlidellCajun
quote:
At a time when our national debt to gdp ratio screams to cut costs on government spending, a gigantic gaudy ballroom, amounts to fiddling while DC burns….
So nothing should ever change or improve because it costs money?
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:22 am to VOR
I'd like to see a cost analysis of how much money it will save the government in the future compared to how much tax payers have spent holding functions at third party venues in the past.
Plus the events will now be a hell of a lot more secure.
Plus the events will now be a hell of a lot more secure.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:22 am to VOR
quote:
Can anyone actually justify spending billions on such a ghastly looking project?
I know how you feel. I said the same thing when the Obama's lit up the White House in LGBTQ colors. I knew immediately the costs would run into the billions to pay for their LGBTQ agenda on Americans.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:22 am to VOR
Trump stated: “The ballroom is actually a fortified anti-drone military command center.”
So, it's really more of a military complex. The roof is a drone port. It's a strong military position to protect the President and elected officials. Essential architecture for an era of drone warfare.
But..
I think we do need to come up with a new name for it instead of "a ballroom".
Maybe the "Bunker Ballroom"? The "Underground City"?
These Figs saying that he goes into the bunker in January 2029 to protect himself and his Cabinet from the people who would enforce his departure from office are full of shite.
So, it's really more of a military complex. The roof is a drone port. It's a strong military position to protect the President and elected officials. Essential architecture for an era of drone warfare.
But..
I think we do need to come up with a new name for it instead of "a ballroom".
Maybe the "Bunker Ballroom"? The "Underground City"?
These Figs saying that he goes into the bunker in January 2029 to protect himself and his Cabinet from the people who would enforce his departure from office are full of shite.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:27 am to VOR
Look, we know you're upset your guys missed 3 times now (at least).
However, if NOT having foreign dignitaries and VIPs have to duck in and out under tents, tarps to use Port-a-potties for official state functions for the United States, just alone, does not justify this construction, I don't know what would.
And, as far as security, again, I know you're hoping for another easy layup, but your guys have missed 3 times and that's 3 too many with lax security and luck the only thing between the halfway comic results and real, real national tragedy.
#Sorryforyou
However, if NOT having foreign dignitaries and VIPs have to duck in and out under tents, tarps to use Port-a-potties for official state functions for the United States, just alone, does not justify this construction, I don't know what would.
And, as far as security, again, I know you're hoping for another easy layup, but your guys have missed 3 times and that's 3 too many with lax security and luck the only thing between the halfway comic results and real, real national tragedy.
#Sorryforyou
Posted on 5/20/26 at 10:29 am to VOR
The ballroom is a cover. It’s a bunker for Trump once he gets around to going “full Hitler”
Popular
Back to top



1










