- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
A breakdown of real and fake news
Posted on 12/14/16 at 9:36 am
Posted on 12/14/16 at 9:36 am
Making the rounds as a viral image. Discuss:
Posted on 12/14/16 at 9:38 am to NOLATide
I laughed. Hard. I'm glad I wasn't drinking coffee.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 9:40 am to NOLATide
It's sad someone took the time to make that propaganda and even sadder people will believe it.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 9:41 am to NOLATide
This chart isn't connected to reality. Not this year or last.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 9:41 am to NOLATide
L
O
L
"minimal partisan bias"
lists NPR, Wapo, NYT, and CNN
also Slate and Vox are WAY too centralized
O
L
"minimal partisan bias"
lists NPR, Wapo, NYT, and CNN
also Slate and Vox are WAY too centralized
Posted on 12/14/16 at 9:43 am to SabiDojo
quote:It's why I can't stay away from this board. I just can't wait to see the next bit of lunacy that the sheople have latched onto as truth.
I laughed. Hard. I'm glad I wasn't drinking coffee.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 9:45 am to NOLATide
The fact that they have pedo-loving Slate as more reliable than MSNBC is actually shocking.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 9:46 am to NOLATide
Everything under minimal partisan bias
Posted on 12/14/16 at 9:47 am to geauxtigahs87
quote:Everything not under "Just No/Don't Read This."
Everything under minimal partisan bias
This post was edited on 12/14/16 at 9:49 am
Posted on 12/14/16 at 9:58 am to TX Tiger
1) Guardian and WSJ can stay where they are.
2) WTF on the Economist? Needs to move to the same place the Guardian is. Has not been conservative in the least for about a decade.
3) Move the following from "Mainstream" to the same level as MSNBC:
- NPR
- BBC
- WaPo
- NYT
- NBC News
- AP
- Reuters
- CNN
Not sure if ABC was implicated in the wikileaks stuff?
2) WTF on the Economist? Needs to move to the same place the Guardian is. Has not been conservative in the least for about a decade.
3) Move the following from "Mainstream" to the same level as MSNBC:
- NPR
- BBC
- WaPo
- NYT
- NBC News
- AP
- Reuters
- CNN
Not sure if ABC was implicated in the wikileaks stuff?
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:01 am to NOLATide
A lot of fake news sources in the real news areas.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:02 am to Rover Range
quote:
A breakdown of real and fake news. Fake graph
This. The fact that the graph doesn't even acknowledge the extreme liberal progressive partisan bias in the mainstream media during the last 3 election cycles removes all credibility from their assessment.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:03 am to NOLATide
Chart probably made by the same folks who created all those polls that were so idiotically off the mark...
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:03 am to NOLATide
Just saw this posted on FB. Hysterical
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:03 am to Jyrdis
This was posted by a liberal friend on FB. A gal with a TRUMP/TRAITOR picture as her profile pic is arguing in his feed that NPR is unbiased, credible journalism. It's surreal.
This post was edited on 12/14/16 at 10:05 am
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:04 am to TX Tiger
quote:
TX Tiger
Hey, when you get a chance, give us your chart on what we should be reading, brother. Thanks.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:05 am to NOLATide
It's sad (/hilarious) that someone invented a fake graph with completely arbitrary plot points in order to support their assertion of main-stream republicans pushing fake news.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News