- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 9/11 Truthers
Posted on 1/15/08 at 12:25 am to H-Town Tiger
Posted on 1/15/08 at 12:25 am to H-Town Tiger
quote:
I rejection the notion that they did it for insurance,
I never said they did. It's just that they had to demo it so that it wouldn't be investigated (regardless of why they did it).
Posted on 1/15/08 at 12:28 am to TX Tiger
"Maybe because we like to think for ourselves rather than blindly follow like sheeple"
but you are following what someone else said, so its not yout theory, therefore you yourself are a sheeple
but you are following what someone else said, so its not yout theory, therefore you yourself are a sheeple
Posted on 1/15/08 at 12:34 am to LSUMJ
quote:
but you are following what someone else said, so its not yout theory, therefore you yourself are a sheeple
That's true to some extent. I take from every source I can find and then draw some kind of conclusion rather than just take what the government is dishing out.
Sort of like getting a second (third or fourth) opinion before agreeing to the operation.
Posted on 1/15/08 at 6:29 am to TX Tiger
quote:
Please watch this video and tell me what you think.
Totally different information from anything I've ever seen.
Not about to suffer another silly video.
If there is different info in there, how about summarizing the info. If your synopsis is compelling enough, I might watch it.
until then,
Posted on 1/15/08 at 6:58 am to sharp
quote:
9/11 truthers kind of screw him over.
Kind of?
Posted on 1/15/08 at 7:12 am to TX Tiger
quote:
That's true to some extent. I take from every source I can find and then draw some kind of conclusion rather than just take what the government is dishing out.
Sort of like getting a second (third or fourth) opinion before agreeing to the operation.
Why is it that condescending "Truthers" always anyone that doesn't agree with their view is just "taking what the government dishes out"?
Posted on 1/15/08 at 7:19 am to TX Tiger
quote:
9/11 Truthers
are usually the worst kind of sensationalist vermon. What are they trying to prove? What good does all of this do?
The 9/11 families, for the most part, are sick and tired of this bullshite. It's not helping them. It's opening old wounds.
It's bad enough 9/11 has been so politicized, but this "truther" shite needs to stop.
Look at "Loose Change." This was the epic film that most truthers used to prove their point. Then Loose Change got blown out of the water by Popular Science. Last I heard, Loose Change has completely taken out every conspiracy aspect of 9/11, except for WTC building 7; as if the government set up this elaborate plan just to take out building 7.
Posted on 1/15/08 at 7:52 am to boxcarbarney
quote:
The 9/11 families, for the most part, are sick and tired of this bullshite.
bullshite...there are a lot that still want their questions answered
quote:
Look at "Loose Change." This was the epic film that most truthers used to prove their point. Then Loose Change got blown out of the water by Popular Science. Last I heard, Loose Change has completely taken out every conspiracy aspect of 9/11, except for WTC building 7; as if the government set up this elaborate plan just to take out building 7.
lol...blown away by popular science?? not hardly....once again you are full of shite...loose change has NOT taken out the conspiracy aspect of 911....anymore bullshite you want to post?? i suggest you read this book LINK
and see what and who is behind popular mechanics
This post was edited on 1/15/08 at 7:55 am
Posted on 1/15/08 at 8:06 am to LSURYAN
quote:
lol...blown away by popular science?? not hardly....once again you are full of shite...loose change has NOT taken out the conspiracy aspect of 911....anymore bullshite you want to post?? i suggest you read this book
Loose Change got mollywhopped by the PM research, that is a fact.
quote:
and see what and who is behind popular mechanics
Yeah yeah yeah, who is it, Chertoff's (sp?) brother? That changes the laws of physics how?
Posted on 1/15/08 at 8:08 am to Tiger4Ever
quote:
That changes the laws of physics how?
lol...you want to talk about the laws of physics?? 110 story building falling at free fall speed doesnt just happen without something taking the floors out under it....explain to me where pools of molten metal wayyyy down in the basement of ALL three buildings came from....it was hot enough to exist months after...that does not result from jet fuel, sorry.... LINK
straight from the horses mouth: Frank A. De Martini, Manager WTC Construction & Project Management i
This post was edited on 1/15/08 at 8:11 am
Posted on 1/15/08 at 8:11 am to LSURYAN
If you feel the need to spew retarded 9/11 bullshite, can you please wait until after the election?
Sincerely,
Sane Supporters of Ron Paul
Sincerely,
Sane Supporters of Ron Paul
Posted on 1/15/08 at 8:11 am to LSURYAN
Shut up, Ryan
This post was edited on 1/15/08 at 8:12 am
Posted on 1/15/08 at 8:12 am to MrFreakinMiyagi
quote:
If you feel the need to spew retarded 9/11 bullshite, can you please wait until after the election?
who brought it up jack arse?
Posted on 1/15/08 at 8:21 am to LSURYAN
quote:
lol...you want to talk about the laws of physics?? 110 story building falling at free fall speed doesnt just happen without something taking the floors out under it....explain to me where pools of molten metal wayyyy down in the basement of ALL three buildings came from....it was hot enough to exist months after...that does not result from jet fuel, sorry.... LINK
straight from the horses mouth: Frank A. De Martini, Manager WTC Construction & Project Management i
How long are you going to hang onto this shite? This is exactly what I am talking about, Tigahs sees the obvious:
A plane hit the towers, a subsequent reaction was that the towers collapsed due to structural damange and fire damage...plus a shite ton of weight and kinetic energy once the upper floors collapsed.
I am sorry this is too simple for you to grasp. Instead, you can keep chasing your tail in circles with this bullshite about BOTH towers being rigged for demo.
By the way, the tower was "designed to withstand the impact of a 707". That's great and all, but a 707 didn't hit either building and even if it were a 707, was this structural design actually tested and proven to be capable of withstanding such an impact?
I'll hang up and listen.
This post was edited on 1/15/08 at 8:23 am
Posted on 1/15/08 at 8:36 am to Tiger4Ever
quote:
"designed to withstand the impact of a 707"
MULTIPLE is what he said....There are some problems with that theory; it does not fit the observed facts: It cannot account for either the total failure of the immense core columns, nor the too-rapid-to-blame-it-all-on-gravity collapse times....what destroyed the 47 steel columns in the center?? those should have been standing kind of like a record player spindle...Those undamaged floors below the impact zone would have offered resistance that is thousands of times greater than air. Recall that those lower stories had successfully supported the mass of the tower for 30 years...also a building that has been "injured" and is going to fall will take the path of LEAST resistance....straight down onto itself is NOT the path of least resistance....the top should have toppled over due to the plane hitting the corner...in fact in one video you could see the top starting to topple over but somehow got pulled down the path of least resistance...also, please explain the molten metal for me...i must have missed that part
Posted on 1/15/08 at 8:39 am to LSURYAN
quote:
bullshite...there are a lot that still want their questions answered
a very vocal minority. Most want to go on with their lives and respect the ones lost. The 9/11 truther shite does nothing, but inflate people's sick egos.
quote:
lol...blown away by popular science?? not hardly....once again you are full of shite...loose change has NOT taken out the conspiracy aspect of 911....anymore bullshite you want to post?? i suggest you read this book LINK
and see what and who is behind popular mechanics
Yes, Loose Change got blown away. And yes, they have changed their film. The original film covered almost all the conspiracy theories. As their theories were debunked, they removed them from the film. Now their film is focusing almost entirely on Bldg 7 of the WTC.
quote:
suggest you read this book LINK
That's ok. I'm sure that book is interesting. And I'm also sure they'll be another book that debunks that book. It could go on, and go on and go on.
Posted on 1/15/08 at 8:40 am to LSURYAN
quote:
he said
He also said its like a pencil poking through a mosquito netting, except he left out the flames and jet fuel part.
Dude, you are a loon. End of story. We've gone over this bullshite with you a countless number of times, I am not doing it again. All you will do is pull youtube clips of ONE goober talking about a pencil and a mosquito net.
No thanks.
This post was edited on 1/15/08 at 8:42 am
Posted on 1/15/08 at 8:41 am to boxcarbarney
quote:
Now their film is focusing almost entirely on Bldg 7 of the WTC.
have you seen the new film?? i have....they go into other aspects of 911 but still hold true to the conspiracy
Posted on 1/15/08 at 8:48 am to LSURYAN
quote:
have you seen the new film?? i have....they go into other aspects of 911 but still hold true to the conspiracy
Probably not the newest one. But I've seen interviews w/ the creator (don't remember his name, but his face looks like he's smelling shite) and he has admitted that Popular Science debunked a lot of the theories his original movies were based on.
Posted on 1/15/08 at 8:52 am to boxcarbarney
quote:
But I've seen interviews w/ the creator (don't remember his name, but his face looks like he's smelling shite) and he has admitted that Popular Science debunked a lot of the theories his original movies were based on.
LOL..link...that is total bullshite
Page 4 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News