- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 9/11 Truthers
Posted on 1/16/08 at 5:24 pm to boxcarbarney
Posted on 1/16/08 at 5:24 pm to boxcarbarney
quote:This statement is false.
Not everything in this world is conspiracy.
Posted on 1/17/08 at 9:28 am to TX Tiger
quote:
I assume you meant wear.
You can look through my posts and see that I do not make many grammatical errors, but I guess there is nothing more satisfying than pointing out the mistakes of others.
quote:
I find it humerous that the nutjobs who subscribe to the government conspiracy theory are so quick to criticize someone else's opinion.
You are entitled to your opinion, and I hope you truly believe what you say. But, you are then one who equates people who don't believe the conspiracy to dimwits, and nutjobs.
Posted on 1/17/08 at 9:40 am to Teddy Ruxpin
quote:
The next time someone pulls this shite, they are in for a hurting....
agreed...they'll NEVER be able to do it the same way again. NO ONE is going to sit complacently while a high-jacker slams a plane into a building.
Posted on 1/17/08 at 1:56 pm to boxcarbarney
quote:
You are entitled to your opinion, and I hope you truly believe what you say. But, you are then one who equates people who don't believe the conspiracy to dimwits, and nutjobs.
So we agree then that the whole "Muslims with box cutters" is as ridiculous a conspiracy theory as the majority of those on 9-11 internet web sites?
Posted on 1/17/08 at 2:26 pm to TX Tiger
quote:
So we agree then that the whole "Muslims with box cutters" is as ridiculous a conspiracy theory as the majority of those on 9-11 internet web sites?
No I do not agree with your version of things. But I respect your opinions, as deluded as I may view them.
What is a more probable scenario?
1. Muslim extremists hijacked 4 aircraft and slammed them into buildings.
2. Someone (Bush, government, CIA) came up with an elaborate plan to start a war in the Middle East. This plan involved wiring the largest buildings in the world with thermite bombs so that they would collapse. Also, remote controlled planes were rigged to make it appear that plane crashes brought the buildings down.
Also, a missle was fired into the Pentagon to mix things up.
And, a fake highjacking happened, and fake plane debris was spread over a field in Pennsylvania to make people believe that the fake hijackers were attacked, and brought down the plane.
you tell me which scenario seems more plausible to you.
Posted on 1/17/08 at 2:27 pm to boxcarbarney
Posted on 1/17/08 at 2:28 pm to LSURYAN
quote:
where was norad??
Damn, I forgot about that.
NORAD was told to stand down by the same government that has no problem killing over 3000 innocent civilians.
Posted on 1/17/08 at 2:29 pm to boxcarbarney
you cant answer it so you use sarcasm...classic 
Posted on 1/17/08 at 2:33 pm to LSURYAN
quote:
you cant answer it so you use sarcasm...classic
No I can answer it, but no answer I give will be enough to satisfy you.
I would answer on NORAD, then you would "What about the molten metal?"
I would answer that question, and you would come back with "What about when they said to 'Pull it?'"
Just because one thing is conspiracy does not mean that all things are conspiracy. Hell, some of these 9/11 conspiracy theories contradict themselves.
But thanks for giving me the rolling eyes emoticon.
Posted on 1/17/08 at 2:44 pm to boxcarbarney
so, answer it...let me guess...they couldnt get to the planes in time 
what about cheney KNOWING the plane heading for the pentagon was 50 miles out?? where were the fighters? why wasnt the pentagon evacuated if he knew that?? all questions that need to be answered that no one but the government can answer...
what about cheney KNOWING the plane heading for the pentagon was 50 miles out?? where were the fighters? why wasnt the pentagon evacuated if he knew that?? all questions that need to be answered that no one but the government can answer...Posted on 1/17/08 at 2:49 pm to LSURYAN
quote:
so, answer it...let me guess...they couldnt get to the planes in time what about cheney KNOWING the plane heading for the pentagon was 50 miles out?? where were the fighters? why wasnt the pentagon evacuated if he knew that?? all questions that need to be answered that no one but the government can answer...
No I'm not going to answer these questions. I could go in circles with you for days. Your going to believe your fringe kook theories, and I'm not. I'm prepared to leave it at that. But, I would like for you and Tx Tiger to answer the question I posed earlier. Which scenario seemed more plausible to you?
Posted on 1/17/08 at 2:50 pm to boxcarbarney
which one do you think?? what is your excuse for cheney knowing the plane was 50 miles out?? i want to hear it
Posted on 1/17/08 at 2:52 pm to LSURYAN
quote:
what is your excuse for cheney knowing the plane was 50 miles out?? i want to hear it
I think I gave you my response to this already. What is your answer to my question?
Posted on 1/17/08 at 2:54 pm to boxcarbarney
quote:
I think I gave you my response to this already. What is your answer to my question?
well, since i am a "911 truther" what the hell do you think.....i have never asked you the question about cheney, so go ahead and tell me
Posted on 1/17/08 at 3:07 pm to LSURYAN
crickets.... 
Posted on 1/17/08 at 3:20 pm to LSURYAN
quote:
crickets....
sorry, I'm at work. Truthfully, there have been so many conflicting reports about this whole "Cheney knowing about a plane outside of DC" that it's hard to pin down what is the truth there. But, like I stated earlier, no explaination I give you would be good enough, because you are so firmly set on the fact that there had to be a vast government conspiracy.
edited to add:
I'm at work and cant view video. I'll try and take a look at it this evening if I have time.
This post was edited on 1/17/08 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 1/17/08 at 3:23 pm to boxcarbarney
quote:
I'll try and take a look at it this evening if I have time.
fair enough
Posted on 1/17/08 at 3:27 pm to LSURYAN
Posted on 1/17/08 at 5:59 pm to boxcarbarney
quote:
2. Someone (Bush, government, CIA) came up with an elaborate plan to start a war in the Middle East.
Uhh, hellooo, McFly? PNAC document
quote:
What is a more probable scenario?
1. Muslim extremists hijacked 4 aircraft and slammed them into buildings.
2. Someone (Bush, government, CIA) came up with an elaborate plan to start a war in the Middle East. This plan involved wiring the largest buildings in the world with thermite bombs so that they would collapse. Also, remote controlled planes were rigged to make it appear that plane crashes brought the buildings down.
Also, a missle was fired into the Pentagon to mix things up.
And, a fake highjacking happened, and fake plane debris was spread over a field in Pennsylvania to make people believe that the fake hijackers were attacked, and brought down the plane.
you tell me which scenario seems more plausible to you.
You've just given me two of the most absurd choices imaginable.
I would have to say that anyone choosing either A or B is a nutjob.
No, I'm going to have to go with...
C). Other.
Posted on 1/17/08 at 8:29 pm to TX Tiger
BTW, did anyone watch the video from the original post?
Page 9 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News