Started By
Message

2A doesn't give us the right to bear arms.

Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:36 pm
Posted by DeafVallyBatnR
Member since Sep 2004
16814 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:36 pm
The 2nd Amendment says the the government CAN NOT INFRINGE on our rights to bear arms.

This Law will be unconstitutional the day it passes.
Posted by Demshoes
Up in here
Member since Aug 2015
10183 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:39 pm to
I'm pro gun but "infringe" does not mean no (however you define) reasonable restrictions.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
21389 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:40 pm to
Yes, it's a right we already have. It's just recognizing that right. Any government that doesn't recognize our rights isn't legitimate.
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
27789 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

I'm pro gun but "infringe" does not mean no (however you define) reasonable restrictions.

Wrong.
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14409 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:41 pm to
quote:

I'm pro gun but


Never fails.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
56350 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

I'm pro gun but "infringe" does not mean no (however you define) reasonable restrictions


Removal of due process is a reasonable restriction?

Posted by RobertFootball
SC
Member since Mar 2021
1337 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:45 pm to
That’s like your side claiming “well regulated” means watered down with legislation.
Posted by beulahland
Little D'arbonne
Member since Jan 2013
3567 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:48 pm to
A restriction IS an infringement.

You have been brainwashed.

Posted by BigMob
Georgia
Member since Oct 2021
7625 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:48 pm to
Everybody with 1/2 a brain knows red flag laws will be abused, possibly in wholesale fashion at some point in time.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:49 pm to
"Shall not be infringed" is about as clear and concise as legal jargon gets

quote:

I'm pro gun but


Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69893 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

I'm pro gun but "infringe" does not mean no (however you define) reasonable restrictions.




Yeah, you're not pro-gun.
Posted by TidenUP
Dauphin Island
Member since Apr 2011
14409 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

Everybody with 1/2 a brain knows red flag laws will be abused, possibly in wholesale fashion at some point in time.



There were nutjobs reporting their neighbors' parties during the Covid bullshite. Red flag laws just give the whackos even more reason to report their neighbors.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16706 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

I'm pro gun but "infringe" does not mean no (however you define) reasonable restrictions.


The irony of your choice of words: “restrictions”.

The definition of “infringe” is to limit…. something.

A restriction is a limitation is an infringement.

Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67633 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

I'm pro gun but "infringe" does not mean no (however you define) reasonable restrictions.


Freedom is not negotiable.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57128 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

I'm pro gun but "infringe" does not mean no (however you define) reasonable restrictions.


Taking someone's firearm w/o due process isn't a "reasonable restriction."
Posted by Demshoes
Up in here
Member since Aug 2015
10183 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

Never fails.


That y'all can't handle an opinion that's contrary to what you think or want to think. Yep.

The First Amendment grants the right to free speech. Are there no restrictions on that right? The Fourth Amendment grants the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. Are there no restrictions on that right?

JFC just because its a constitutional right doesn't mean it's not subject to restrictions. It's like y'all jerk off to the Second Amendment like it's some talismanic right bestowed by God that cannot be touched by the hands of man. Whether you agree or not there CAN be restrictions.
This post was edited on 6/22/22 at 6:55 pm
Posted by LookSquirrel
Member since Oct 2019
5901 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:53 pm to
Our "GOD given rights" are not fully appreciated by our Godless government.

Almost time for a strong GOD inspired reminder!
Posted by ninthward
Boston, MA
Member since May 2007
20373 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

I'm pro gun but "infringe" does not mean no (however you define) reasonable restrictions.
Oh yea explain then? and site actual references because I can give a frick about your personal interpretation.
Posted by Gifman
by the mountains
Member since Jan 2021
9219 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

Demshoes


Posted by xGeauxLSUx
United States of Atrophy
Member since Oct 2008
20962 posts
Posted on 6/22/22 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

I'm pro gun but "infringe" does not mean no (however you define) reasonable restrictions.

Infringe:
1. actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
2. act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.



Something tells me you don't know what it means...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram