re: 2 failed moon landings (south side issues...)

quote:

---

Struggling to land on moon in 2019 yet we did it in 1969? Moon landing faked fo sho

---

Why the downvotes? This is pretty damn obvious. They don’t replay the footage often because it looks like the dated sci-fi movie it is.

quote:

---

America landed on Luna six times using slide rules and notepads.

India cannot make a safe, soft landing with billion$$$ in modern computer technology.

And these are the people we call when our iPads and cell phones won’t work right.

---

God help me. I finally upvoted something you posted.

Did man land on the moon in the 1960s

Hollywood > Bollywood

Did they crash? Or did they just say they did?

quote:

---

India lost contact with its spacecraft just before touchdown.

---

Spacecraft probably couldn’t understand the tech support person at the call center.

India

First country to shite on the moon.

quote:

---

Did man land on the moon in the 1960s

---

Of course. 1970s too.

Any objective, intellectual examination of available data, including non-governmental information and VERIFICATION, would conclude the manned landings happened as chronicled by NASA.

Believing otherwise, is just kooky. Or some other motive.

https://www.inverse.com/article/61521-mysterious-metal-detected-under-lunar-surface

quote:

---

Scientists detected a metal "anomaly" deep beneath the lunar surface It's more likely to be from asteroids than benevolent aliens. lunar surface with metal anomaly
By Sarah Wells on December 14, 2019 Filed Under China, NASA & Science Fiction I

---

quote:

---

n June 2019, scientists discovered something strange buried 180 miles beneath the lunar surface. While the discovery does sound eerily similar to the beginning of Stanley Kubrick’s film, 2001: A Space Odyssey, scientists have a much more scientific explanation for this particular anomaly. Instead of an alien monolith, scientists think that it is actually an estimated 4.8 quintillion pounds of metal — a deposit formed from leftover shrapnel from an asteroid impact.

---

quote:

---

When we combined [that data] with lunar topography data from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, we discovered the unexpectedly large amount of mass hundreds of miles underneath the South Pole-Aitken basin,” James said. “One of the explanations of this extra mass is that the metal from the asteroid that formed this crater is still embedded in the Moon’s mantle.” Using computer simulations of an asteroid impact, the scientists determined that it would be possible for the iron-nickel core of such an asteroid to be dispersed into the upper lunar mantel (between its core and crust.)

---

So I’ll play devils advocate.

If the moon was formed during a collision with proto earth why would it be unreasonable to assume that heavy metals settled to different areas of the moon rather than being dispersed uniformly?