- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:01 pm to HagaDaga
quote:
What was her title tho?? I bet she had one...
The things DU tells these clowns to latch onto, and thinking it might actually mean anything.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:02 pm to Decatur
quote:
What is Musk’s actual position? What is his formal job title?
Would Trump putting the label "czar" on him like Obama did with over 30 appointees who had the same powers make you feel better?
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:05 pm to loogaroo
quote:
Time to investigate these AG’s campaign financing.
Absolutely, if you don’t want to weed out waste and fraud, it’s probably because you are complicit. They were not to concerned when Clinton and Obama did this but now since it’s Trump, and he knows the truth, it’s bad!
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:06 pm to timdonaghyswhistle
Musk is head of Doge - an organization started by Obama
It’s all 100% legal and constitutional
Besides the libs hate the constitution
It’s all 100% legal and constitutional
Besides the libs hate the constitution
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:06 pm to Decatur
quote:
What is Musk’s actual position? What is his formal job title?
Could the head of the executive branch of the United States federal government not contract with say, McKinsey and Deloitte, to perform audits of certain offices of the executive branch of the United States federal government?
I’m confused about the constitutional crisis this would present.
This post was edited on 2/14/25 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:07 pm to loogaroo
Musk has NO authority!!!! He is just an advisor. Case dismissed.
This post was edited on 2/14/25 at 2:07 pm
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:10 pm to Decatur
quote:
Either they changed their mind at the last minute or were misleading the public. My sense is they changed it at the last minute and I suspect that’s why the first GC resigned after three days.
Now who is making stuff up?
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:12 pm to BigBro
quote:
I have a feeling they don't want that though
They absolutely want that. Those states give more money to the US than they get back. They would be instantly richer...until we invaded them and took it all.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:12 pm to Decatur
Elon Musk has more intelligence in one of his farts than Biden or any political leader in the US yet you had no problem with them working in the executive branch. You don’t like it because he works for Trump but just remember you enthusiastically voted for a geriatric retard
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:15 pm to BBONDS25
So did they change their mind or were they always misleading the public that this entity would be outside of the government ? What’s your sense?
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:17 pm to Decatur
quote:
So did they change their mind or were they always misleading the public that this entity would be outside of the government ?
Misleading who do to what?
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:21 pm to Decatur
quote:
It’s my curiosity.
There’s a certain time you radical leftists become curious about the government.
I just can’t quite figure out what the trigger is though.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:30 pm to winkchance
quote:
How is he any different than any other contractor with the federal government.
If you don't know how federal contracts work, just say you don't know.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:37 pm to loogaroo
No doubt they will find a judge who will give them what they want.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 2:59 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
If you don't know how federal contracts work, just say you don't know.
You think the head of the entire executive branch of the federal government of the United States has to follow some procedure set up for his underlings? Honest question.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 3:15 pm to winkchance
quote:
Here is the Constitution if you need it:
Article 2 - Section 1
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
-------------------------
This isn't relevant to this discussion, but I found this language interesting. If I'm reading this correctly, the President doesn't have to be born in the US, as long as they are a US Citizen, 35 years old and been here at least 14 years.
Am I reading that right?
Perhaps Elon the Magnificent could be next?
I know he doesn't want it.. just saying hypothetically..
This post was edited on 2/14/25 at 3:17 pm
Posted on 2/14/25 at 3:17 pm to loogaroo
Many, including me, thought this type oversight would never be done, till we were in a depression and there was no money left… This is awesome
Posted on 2/14/25 at 3:20 pm to McLemore
Elon gets billions in federal contracts, and he's now in a position to frick with direct competitors, using the federal government as a weapon.
I'm old enough to remember when Republicans had a problem with that.
I'm old enough to remember when Republicans had a problem with that.
Posted on 2/14/25 at 3:23 pm to POTUS2024
quote:
There is a reasonable position here that Trump is giving access without an appropriate amount of vetting
Musk has had high security clearance for years.
Trump can give anyone security clearance.
Trump can declassify whatever he wants because he is the President.
Page 7 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News