- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: proposed speck and redfish changes
Posted on 7/1/23 at 1:02 pm to hall59tiger
Posted on 7/1/23 at 1:02 pm to hall59tiger
quote:
conservation on the level of FL or TX anglers
The problem is the ecosystem is nowhere close to the same and that level of conservation would be pointless. There is nothing Louisiana anglers can do to produce the same size fish found in either Florida or Texas.
quote:
Even if there was enough money and resources to conduct those studies we could never complete control for the amount of variables at play in these complex ecosystems.
Why not have a website where guides and recreational anglers can go to post their trip details so the wlf can have a better idea? In 40+ yrs of fishing outside of a handful of stops by wlf I’ve never been asked about my catch.
Posted on 7/1/23 at 2:27 pm to TJG210
quote:
The problem is the ecosystem is nowhere close to the same and that level of conservation would be pointless. There is nothing Louisiana anglers can do to produce the same size fish found in either Florida or Texas. quote:
I’m not talking about just catch and release. LA is far behind when it comes to water quality, trash in the marsh, taking care of public ramps, commercial fishing regs, and basically anything else you could think of. Catch and release is just a small but helpful part of that.
quote:
Why not have a website where guides and recreational anglers can go to post their trip details so the wlf can have a better idea?
This is not a bad idea but it will only account for a small amount of what is necessary. You could run into the argument everyone tried to use to invalidate the ldwf surveys.
People are so quick to look at what is happening right now and not long term trends. I’ve had an incredibly successful past two years but I don’t believe that’s indicative of the direction our fishery is going over the last 10, 20, 50 years. If you have fished that long then you should be well aware of how much it has diminished.
I think there are many factors outside of the rec anglers control contributing to a decline but, to me, I don’t really care what condition the fishery is currently in. I am a proponent of doing whatever is within my control to make it the best that it can be. If it’s currently improving then I’m fascinated with how we can make it even better. That’s just my personality with everything.
TLDR: everyone should find ways to give back to the fishery in whatever way they see fit. I’m ok with that but I’m not ok with a greedy, all take and no give mindset.
Posted on 7/1/23 at 3:06 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
Eliminating the guide limit on charter trips
Explain?
This post was edited on 7/1/23 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 7/1/23 at 4:58 pm to hall59tiger
quote:
You could run into the argument everyone tried to use to invalidate the ldwf surveys.
quote:
LA is far behind when it comes to water quality, trash in the marsh, taking care of public ramps, commercial fishing regs, and basically anything else you could think of.
Not really sure what you mean by water quality, but I can agree on the rest of the things you mentioned needing work.
quote:
You could run into the argument everyone tried to use to invalidate the ldwf surveys.
I can understand your concern, but if you listen to the charter boat guys who are out there every day making their living fishing, I’m sure you can get some fair information. They are out there every day and know what’s going on.
quote:
I’ve had an incredibly successful past two years but I don’t believe that’s indicative of the direction our fishery is going over the last 10, 20, 50 years. If you have fished that long then you should be well aware of how much it has diminished.
Fair, but there a ton of other factors at play that likely won’t change. Number of folks fishing, diminishing land. It may never be as good as it is now, no matter what.
The river diversions they are about to unleash will completely mess up things from grand isle and to the west.
I think some of these lower limits is to set people up for when they eventually mess up the entire fishery.
Posted on 7/1/23 at 5:08 pm to Contrary
quote:
Explain?
If there are 4 people in a boat + guide….you can keep 4 limits of fish, not 5.
Posted on 7/2/23 at 5:03 am to AlxTgr
quote:
The Louisiana Wildlife and Fisheries Commission will consider a notice of intent at the Thursday, Nov 5 meeting in Baton Rouge to create a 1-mile buffer off Louisiana’s beaches where pogey boats won’t be allowed to fish.
Cut the quota in half and the 1 mile buffer. Then we might have something.
Posted on 7/2/23 at 10:32 am to Contrary
On paid charter trips, you’d only be able to keep limits for the customers. Guide plus 2 customers on board = 2 limits of fish instead of 3.
Posted on 7/2/23 at 4:07 pm to hall59tiger
quote:
I’ve talked to researchers who say the best thing we could do for trout would be to increase the size limit to 15””.
They are absolutely correct and this is the quickest fix but it seems nobody has the balls to make that call.
The goal of any correctly managed fishery (LA is Not!) is to have the fish spawn at least once before harvest.
Science says approx 75% of female trout spawn at 12”.
It moves to 100% at 14” with some fish spawning twice.
The push to protect the bull reds is because the average size of redfish spawning is 26”.
My problem w all this is this. If it is set to sunset in 3 years, why not move for more aggressive fix like the above mentioned 14” minimum? Because in my opinion, what they are proposing won’t fix biomass or spr in 3 years.
This post was edited on 7/2/23 at 4:15 pm
Posted on 7/2/23 at 7:33 pm to TopWaterTiger
quote:
My problem w all this is this. If it is set to sunset in 3 years, why not move for more aggressive fix like the above mentioned 14” minimum? Because in my opinion, what they are proposing won’t fix biomass or spr in 3 years.
Pretty sure wlf proposed 14” and 20 or 25 initially a couple years ago. Don’t think anyone wanted the size limit change though.
Posted on 7/2/23 at 7:41 pm to catchyalater
I have always thought the Clients should only be allowed to take home the fish that they catch, and not a bunch of fish that the guide catches. How often have you seen a guide catching fish after fish, while his Clients only catch a few fish.
I once watched a guide count how many fish had been caught. Their boat was close enough that heard him say that they needed 7 more specks to limit out.
I then watched the guide catch 6 more and a Client caught one. Before the guide counted the days catch, he had been steadily catching specks. I wonder just how many specks that guide caught and kept that day?
Maybe when making any "NEW" changes..... Maybe the GUIDE should be restricted to only catch and release and spend more time showing his Clients how to catch fish.
I once watched a guide count how many fish had been caught. Their boat was close enough that heard him say that they needed 7 more specks to limit out.
I then watched the guide catch 6 more and a Client caught one. Before the guide counted the days catch, he had been steadily catching specks. I wonder just how many specks that guide caught and kept that day?
Maybe when making any "NEW" changes..... Maybe the GUIDE should be restricted to only catch and release and spend more time showing his Clients how to catch fish.
This post was edited on 7/2/23 at 7:46 pm
Posted on 7/2/23 at 7:53 pm to gerald65
In the Big Lake area...... back in 2006 the limit was lowered to 15 specks and only 2 above 25" could be kept.
How does the LDWF justify the need to lower the limit to only keeping 2 above 19" size fish? Why not stay with the 2 above 25" limit?
How does the LDWF justify the need to lower the limit to only keeping 2 above 19" size fish? Why not stay with the 2 above 25" limit?
Posted on 7/2/23 at 9:01 pm to gerald65
quote:
How does the LDWF justify the need to lower the limit to only keeping 2 above 19" size fish? Why not stay with the 2 above 25" limit?
They seem to be shooting from the hip on all of this. Apparently the revised limits in the big lake didn’t do squat.
Posted on 7/2/23 at 9:05 pm to gerald65
quote:
Maybe when making any "NEW" changes..... Maybe the GUIDE should be restricted to only catch and release and spend more time showing his Clients how to catch fish.
I really don’t care one way or the other on this, but this is a very strange hill to die on. As long as the customers aren’t taking home the guides share of fish, what difference does it really make? If a guide takes some people out from Oklahoma that can’t catch fish in a bucket, does it really make a difference if the guide catches a few for them to bring home?
Posted on 7/3/23 at 1:58 am to TopWaterTiger
quote:
They are absolutely correct and this is the quickest fix but it seems nobody has the balls to make that call.
LDWF tried to get close to this but the LA charter boat association lobbied to shut it down. I don’t think the new regs are the best case but at least it’s a step in the right direction
Posted on 7/3/23 at 6:51 am to magicman534
quote:
agree that most boats don’t bring back 15pp but My view on this is not really science based as it is practical for my family. 15 trout per person is plenty for me to cook for them as I never freeze fish. Just my opinion.
We had a 2 person limit yesterday by 7:30. Not my fault people aren't good at fishing
Ended up feeding 6 people and still 4 ziplock bags to freeze and eat during the week
Posted on 7/3/23 at 6:54 am to hall59tiger
quote:yet we ignore the elephant in the room, our rapidly and exponentially degrading habitat and the impact this has on all of our fisheries. bass fishing, sac au lait fishing and even catfishing is exponentially better than when I was a youngster(started fishing 1973). yet specks, reds and flounders are in fact declining. conservation works - 1973 in some parishes you would make the news if you saw a deer much less killed one - where deer are common now.
I’m not talking about just catch and release. LA is far behind when it comes to water quality, trash in the marsh, taking care of public ramps, commercial fishing regs, and basically anything else you could think of. Catch and release is just a small but helpful part of that.
This post was edited on 7/3/23 at 6:56 am
Posted on 7/3/23 at 6:58 am to gerald65
I'm not sure what that has to do with what I'm saying. I didn't even know guides were allowed to take part in the boat's total limit and fully support reversing that.
Posted on 7/3/23 at 7:18 am to maisweh
quote:
We had a 2 person limit yesterday by 7:30. Not my fault people aren't good at fishing
This is the most overused, straw man argument I see used to discredit people supporting the proposed regs. I talk to lots of fishermen across the state who think we need to do something about the current regulations. Many of whom could hang with any guides or tournament people out there.
Posted on 7/3/23 at 7:32 am to hall59tiger
Right? All you have to do is clean your fish at the marina to see what people are bringing in and it ain't 2+ man limits of any species.
And suppose someone is just that much better at fishing (really, it would be that much better at finding), why do you need to keep so many? Just go back out and catch them some more.
And suppose someone is just that much better at fishing (really, it would be that much better at finding), why do you need to keep so many? Just go back out and catch them some more.
Posted on 7/3/23 at 10:32 am to catchyalater
quote:
why do you need to keep so many? Just go back out and catch them some more.
Because I could catch enough to feed my family for a few weeks on 1 trip and save gas and time. I'm not an all high and mighty "I only eat fresh and keep what I can catch that day" dickhead.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News