Started By
Message

re: Zelensky willing to end war and concede territory in exchange for NATO membership

Posted on 11/29/24 at 11:29 pm to
Posted by Geauxgurt
Member since Sep 2013
11833 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 11:29 pm to
This is desperation by this clown to try and force the West’s hands by claiming the NATO bylaws would have to be applied and they would also have to fight with Ukraine directly.

Instead of him stealing g money left and right and sending his own people to die to enrich himself and help keep the West’s money laundering system in place, why doesn’t he resign and go sit in a hole of shite where he belongs.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
52353 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

Does anyone actually think Russia going all out doesn't roll Ukraine?


Yes. You are seeing something that was suspected to occur in WW3. Guided anti tank missiles able to be carried by infantry changes the game. Defensively, you no longer need to meet force with force to bleed them out. You can fire from a concealed position in ambush, hop in a jeep, and restablish down the line.
This post was edited on 11/29/24 at 11:34 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
117998 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 11:34 pm to
quote:

The day Zelensky assumes room temperature is a good day. But probably not before he gets to spend his billions we’ve sent him while our own disabled, limbs blown off veterans can’t get a proper wheelchair.


Forget Zelensky. I honestly do not fault him for everything he has done in this war, because quite frankly if I were in his unenviable situation, I’d probably be doing everything that he is doing. If Zelensky fricks up or surrenders to Russia, then he and his entire family are going to be chopped into little pieces by the literal Nazis that surround him. So what would you do if your wife and children were being threatened by this?

So if Zelensky dies tomorrow, they’ll only put another person in that position that can be physically blackmailed in the same way. Zelensky controls nothing.
This post was edited on 11/29/24 at 11:37 pm
Posted by Candyman
Member since Sep 2017
641 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 11:35 pm to
Its probably the CIA that controls or influences half of the articals that the New York Times print. If they are admitting to having 12 CIA bases in Ukraine, then you can rest assure that its disinformation. Otherwise, it wouldn't be printed. You evidently don't understand what a controlled media is.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
117998 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

Along with Putin and the Russia we’ve always known. They’re slaves to the Chinese now. Russia has a long and harsh winter coming.


You’re a fricking idiot for thinking this is a good thing. We want China and Russia to be distant and on bad terms, not dependent on one another. It’s literally America’s worst foreign policy nightmare. You are a tard of the highest order.
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
17629 posts
Posted on 11/29/24 at 11:40 pm to
Putin: “best I can do is I keep all the lands I currently hold and you refuse NATO membership in exchange for peace.”

Honestly it’s the best path forward. Ukraine keeps Odessa and the port and people can try to resume normal life.
Posted by sta4ever
Member since Aug 2014
16931 posts
Posted on 11/30/24 at 12:18 am to
quote:

You’re a fricking idiot for thinking this is a good thing. We want China and Russia to be distant and on bad terms, not dependent on one another. It’s literally America’s worst foreign policy nightmare. You are a tard of the highest order.


It’s not like they haven’t been allies for a long time lol. The only difference now is that Russia has to sell everything to China at a super low price. China won’t come to Russias aid either. China just loves the very cheap, rich resources they’re getting by being friendly with Russia, while the rest of the world wants nothing to do with Russia. China will be friendly with Russia until they have no more to offer. China will never risk their economy over Moscow.
Posted by red sox fan 13
Valley Park
Member since Aug 2018
17094 posts
Posted on 11/30/24 at 1:07 am to
quote:

Uh…the treaty between Ukraine and Russia said no nato.
Russia also signed a treaty promising not to attack Ukraine after Ukraine handed over its nukes. So the precedent of breaking treaties in place.
Posted by red sox fan 13
Valley Park
Member since Aug 2018
17094 posts
Posted on 11/30/24 at 1:17 am to
Russia is going to be a Chinese client in the next 50 years. They already are the junior partner, and China wants that land in Siberia, some of which the Qing once owned, badly. They have a massive population compared to Russia in that region and are ready to expand.
Posted by Slevin7
Member since Sep 2015
2443 posts
Posted on 11/30/24 at 2:43 am to
You’re right.

If I’m Russia I nuke that bitch while sending out a message “agreement terminated. Go ahead and join NATO.”

You may retarded.

You think shite works like it does at your fricking **** private school but in reality if you frick around with people who aren’t joking they are going to quite literally “put you in check”.

I’m not a Putin fan. I do know Russia slow rolls this because they care but it’s not that big a deal to them. You believe your own bullshite. The second Russia wants this fight over it’s over.

Nothing besides actual other countries coming to fight and die over this bullshite is going to save Ukraine and no one actually cares. It’s manufactured bullshite.

And yeah we probably have a bunch of virus labs and shady shite over there that our guys “serving America” don’t want us to know about. And it’s probably beneficial to offer that guy Z a chance to launder some money in an effort to postpone us losing that shite.

We are gonna go more broke trying to never discuss our own governments corruption.

Can’t wait.

Maybe I can get nuked in the next month so I never know my leaders are pieces of shite.

I hope most of these people burn in hell.

They invited this shite.

Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
30469 posts
Posted on 11/30/24 at 7:54 am to
quote:

I’m not a Putin fan. I do know Russia slow rolls this because they care but it’s not that big a deal to them. You believe your own bullshite. The second Russia wants this fight over it’s over.



Well I’d figure they’d want it over prior to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Russians and having to rely on North Korea of all people for weapons and additional personnel
Posted by CR4090
Member since Apr 2023
6467 posts
Posted on 11/30/24 at 7:58 am to
No!
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
117998 posts
Posted on 11/30/24 at 8:53 am to
quote:

It’s not like they haven’t been allies for a long time lol.


Not really. They are not natural allies and more natural rivals. Nixon and Kissinger managed to separate them off relatively easily, and save for having communist ties that’s basically all they’ve ever allied themselves on. Historically Americans have gotten along more with the Chinese than the Russians have.

quote:

The only difference now is that Russia has to sell everything to China at a super low price. China won’t come to Russias aid either. China just loves the very cheap, rich resources they’re getting by being friendly with Russia, while the rest of the world wants nothing to do with Russia. China will be friendly with Russia until they have no more to offer. China will never risk their economy over Moscow.


You have no fricking clue what you’re talking about.
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
10122 posts
Posted on 11/30/24 at 9:15 am to
OK, I don't know the Ukraine constitution, but shouldn't that be a decision made by the representative part of government? Or is he THE government?

That doesn't make sense for that many lives to be lost for ????Nato membership.
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
14656 posts
Posted on 11/30/24 at 9:17 am to
quote:

I can understand his wanting to do this for his people, but Putin will end this when he is ready.


That little frickin midget doesnt give two shits about Ukrainians.

Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
18895 posts
Posted on 11/30/24 at 9:25 am to
I am, I think access to the black sea is important frick zelinski
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
144382 posts
Posted on 11/30/24 at 9:34 am to
quote:

OK, I don't know the Ukraine constitution
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
136982 posts
Posted on 11/30/24 at 9:34 am to
This is what’s going to happen if we agree to this:

They get into NATO then spend the next several years provoking Russia along the new border to goad them into action to invoke Article 5 so they can take back the territory they gave up.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
38378 posts
Posted on 11/30/24 at 9:36 am to
quote:

The second Russia wants this fight over it’s over.


Didn't they want this fight over within 3 days? It's been nearly 1000 days at this point lmao.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
281843 posts
Posted on 11/30/24 at 9:37 am to
quote:



Didn't they want this fight over within 3 days? It's been nearly 1000 days at this point lmao.


How are you Ukraine bros holding out on the front lines?

first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram