Started By
Message

re: WSJ: How a Man Convicted of Running a Latin American Narco State Landed a Pardon

Posted on 12/4/25 at 3:08 pm to
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
37499 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

In fairness she trafficked the girls to nobody....
Maxwell was convicted based on real, named minors who testified, plus documents, photos, flight records, and every other piece of evidence you would know about if you'd ever read past the headlines. Their identities were known to the court and the jury.

Regardless of what maga influencers tell you, criminal law doesn’t require the government to publish a VIP guest list to convict a trafficker any more than it has to name every user to convict a drug dealer. I know that’s disappointing for people who think trials are supposed to operate like a TMZ story, but the crime is the recruiting and transporting of victims for abuse, which is exactly what the jury found she did.

The honest version of your “she trafficked to no one” line is: “I don’t like where this points politically, so I’m going to pretend the victims don’t exist.”
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
37499 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

I don't get the hate on you for this.
Who did she traffick them to?
Why aren't they arrested?
If don't know, why is there no investigation?
You are asking who she trafficked them to, so let me ask you some things back:

-If Epstein was the named co-conspirator in the indictment, and the victims testified directly about being recruited for him, who do you think the primary abuser is supposed to be?

- If the primary abuser is dead, how exactly do you imagine an arrest is supposed to happen?

- Do you think a trafficking conviction requires prosecutors to arrest every single downstream participant before they are allowed to charge the recruiter?

- And If that were true, how could we ever convict a drug dealer without first rounding up every customer?

The victims were real, they testified under oath, and their identities were fully known to the court. Multiple investigations and civil suits already happened. The idea that none of this exists because you personally want a longer guest list is an escape hatch, not a logical requirement.

The real question is this: is the standard “what does the evidence show,” or is the standard “what conclusion would be most comfortable for you, politically”?

Because only one of those leads you to pretending the victims never existed.

quote:

Fails logic.


quote:

Free Ghislane!
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
35798 posts
Posted on 12/4/25 at 4:06 pm to
I wonder what donation amounts to the Presidential Library complex were for these people and their lawyers
Posted by JoeyP239
Member since Nov 2025
103 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:38 am to
Pardoning this guy and the Silk Road founder makes no sense
Posted by awestruck
Member since Jan 2015
13228 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 1:50 am to
quote:

Pardoning this guy and the Silk Road founder makes no sense
Sipping Mar-a-Lago swamp water makes it all feel better.
Posted by Kenna City Solja
America’s City
Member since Nov 2025
509 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 2:21 am to
quote:

Anyone who claims to be conservative should be embarrassed by this.

When Charlie Kirk was assassinated, that was the moment I decided I will forever turn a blind eye to all of the stupid shite Trump says and does

Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
133240 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 8:27 am to
quote:

A pardon was granted to someone convicted of smuggling 400 tons of coke into the US while at the same time we are gearing up for war because of muh drugs. Is anything even necessary?



I mean, we also staffed NASA with Nazis.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
92330 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 8:42 am to
quote:

Fact is, Trump will not hesitate to pardon anyone who is rich and/or influential. He is a master of using his office for his own gain.



Be specific
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
9705 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 8:49 am to
quote:


I wonder what donation amounts to the Presidential Library complex were for these people and their lawyers


That's the fun part...trying to figure out which of the many ways to pay a bribery are in play for each pardon. Presidential Library? The East Wing? Crypto transfer? Business deal with the kiddos?

No telling.
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12181 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 8:51 am to
quote:

I mean, we also staffed NASA with Nazis.
That actually served a purpose.
Posted by lionward2014
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2015
13358 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 9:42 am to
quote:

Silk Road founder


Pardoning Ross Ulbricht is one of the best things Trump did with his presidency. The main agent in charge of investigating him is in jail now because of all the shady shite he did.

ETA: I do also see the irony now that he pardoned a convicted drug trafficker and the creator of the largest drug marketplace ever while talking about getting us in a hot war with Venezuela to stop drugs coming into the US.
This post was edited on 12/5/25 at 9:44 am
Posted by PhilipMarlowe
Member since Mar 2013
21655 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 9:48 am to
Thanks trump.
Posted by DaleGribblesMower
Member since Dec 2013
6996 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 9:57 am to
He likely was working for the government
Posted by redneck hippie
Oklahoma
Member since Dec 2008
6288 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Pardoning Ross Ulbricht is one of the best things Trump did with his presidency.


I don’t disagree about the drug stuff, but wasn’t he caught up in a murder for hire conspiracy?
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51952 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 10:47 am to
quote:

All you haters, "cry more". Yall's TDS is incurable.

It doesn’t take TDS to object to pardoning criminals.
Posted by BraveCajun
Lafayette
Member since May 2009
207 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 10:52 am to
quote:

doesn’t take TDS to object to pardoning criminals.


So you’re only in favor of presidential pardons of non-criminals?
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51952 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 10:53 am to
quote:

So you’re only in favor of presidential pardons of non-criminals?

No. I’m in favor of judicious use of the Presidential pardon.
Posted by sharkfhin
Water
Member since Sep 2008
4823 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 12:17 pm to
The guy was framed. Do your research lefty.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
51952 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

The guy was framed. Do your research lefty.

Was he? Framed by the first Trump administration and pardoned by the second?
Posted by Gus007
TN
Member since Jul 2018
14068 posts
Posted on 12/5/25 at 4:08 pm to
Oh? I thought you were going to mention one of the Bush family or Clinton.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram