Started By
Message

WSJ: U.S. Shale Boom Shows Signs of Peaking

Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:23 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21165 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:23 am
quote:

HOUSTON—The boom in oil production that over the last decade made the U.S. the world’s largest producer is waning, suggesting the era of shale growth is nearing its peak.

Frackers are hitting fewer big gushers in the Permian Basin, America’s busiest oil patch, the latest sign they have drained their catalog of good wells. Shale companies’ biggest and best wells are producing less oil, according to data reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

The Journal reported last year companies would exhaust their best U.S. inventory in a handful of years if they resumed the breakneck drilling pace of prepandemic times.

Now, recent results out of the Permian, spread across West Texas and New Mexico, are mimicking the onset of a production plateau that has taken place at other, more mature U.S. shale plays.

At a major industry conference here this week, executives cited the stagnation in shale, saying it signaled a return to more dependence on foreign energy sources and more challenging times ahead for major U.S. companies, after most of them posted record earnings last year.


quote:

Oil production in the U.S. rose from about 7.2 million barrels a day a decade ago to a high of about 13 million barrels a day before the pandemic. But domestic output last year grew at one-third of the annual average pace seen in shale’s heyday from 2017 to 2019, and hasn’t yet caught up with prepandemic levels.

The slowdown was mostly because of investor pressure on companies to curtail spending and limit growth in favor of generating higher returns. At the same time, weaker well results in the Delaware basin contributed to flattening output.


quote:

Companies such as Chevron Corp., Devon Energy Corp. and others that have held the Permian up as a central pillar of their future plans saw top wells yield less crude last year than the previous year.

Chevron, one of the largest landholders in the Permian, drilled some of the region’s most prolific wells in Culberson County, Texas, but some of its newer wells there have seen productivity decline.


quote:

Chevron executives said last week the company missed its oil-production target in the Delaware, citing higher-than-expected depletion rates. The company plans to revise its approach in the Permian, they said, shifting some drilling into New Mexico, and targeting areas that are likely more productive—moves that will reduce its pace of activity somewhat.

Chevron Chief Executive Mike Wirth said last week the rate of production growth and drilling activity the U.S. shale industry saw a decade ago “is unlikely to be repeated,” though the Permian still has areas that haven’t been developed.


quote:

Investment bank Raymond James Financial Inc. estimated in a September report that public producers and private operators in the Delaware hold about 7.2 years of sweet spots, and less than eight years in the Midland basin, the other major portion of the Permian.

Shale’s sluggishness means global oil markets will have to rely on Middle Eastern crude over the next decades, said Scott Sheffield, CEO of Pioneer Natural Resources Co.

“We’re just not gonna have that big growth pump like we used to,” he said of U.S. crude production.


LINK

Come on, Permian gods. Give me double that 7 to 8 years, and I won’t complain.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73674 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:26 am to
This time next year shale could crater, in 6 years it will be higher than ever, and WSJ will print op-eds the whole time that will keep the chicken littles running around.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64122 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:29 am to
John Kruk truck nut
[on] off
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120176 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:30 am to
I thought US shale reserves were more than Saudi Arabia?

Sounds like more peak oil BS
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21165 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:33 am to
quote:

This time next year shale could crater, in 6 years it will be higher than ever, and WSJ will print op-eds the whole time that will keep the chicken littles running around.


Personally, I think there’s still 15-20 years of Permian new well inventory. There’s several benches in the NM portions that have yet to truly be drilled, other than a few here and there, and there’s regions that haven’t been heavily produced yet due to lack of infrastructure and takeaway capacity, which means capital heavy investment.

DJ shale probably needs to be all drilled up within the next five years before developers completely build on top of that best acreage. From there, we still have shale basins in Wyoming, North Dakota and Utah that have yet to be fully developed, much due to the same reason as some of the not fully developed Permian regions. Infrastructure and takeaway capacity. Those will just be shale plays that will require higher oil prices to be profitable.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51794 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:34 am to
That article is complete and total bullshite.
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
34998 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:35 am to
Peak oil!!! Time to panic!!!

What a blast from the past.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
52918 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:36 am to
If Biden wouldn’t have brought down gas prices we’d still be making bank in the oil patch!
Posted by XenScott
Pensacola
Member since Oct 2016
3124 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:43 am to
Wait til the full effects of Russian oil going away are felt. American oil will boom again. Also, electrification has been punted down the way as the materials and components needed come from the Russian and Chinese space.
Posted by Athanatos
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
8141 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:45 am to
Incentives to invest in domestic drilling and exploration have been low for years, so there is a correlation/causation issue here.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37457 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:52 am to
quote:

The slowdown was mostly because of investor pressure on companies to curtail spending and limit growth in favor of generating higher returns.


Oil is still there, but business returns and uncertainty of the future market is dictating that companies maximize short term profits
Posted by TigerDog83
Member since Oct 2005
8274 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:53 am to
There's some inventory in places, but the Bakken and Eagleford are well past peak. Most of the growth in the Permian is coming from New Mexico as the Midland basin is getting saturated in the Spraberry and Wolfcamp. Bone Springs wells are saturated in places as well. Things start getting gassier as other zones are hit. Gas will face the same fate as the Marcellus and core areas of the Haynesville are starting to get heavily saturated as well, forcing moves to lower tier acreage with higher prices.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
9355 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 7:56 am to
quote:

I thought US shale reserves were more than Saudi Arabia?


Actual shale oil definitely and its all in the Rockies, most in Colorado. HOWEVER, large quantities of water are removed near the source of the Colorado River to retort the mined shale, retort it then refine it. I have put my hands on the only refinery built to refine it. This was after it was dissembled and in a laydown yard in the Houston area. Built in 1982, dismantled in 2011.

What this article is about is Tight Shale oil not shale oil. There is a big difference.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
9355 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:06 am to
quote:

From there, we still have shale basins in Wyoming, North Dakota and Utah that have yet to be fully developed


Utah's Uinta basin is not shale.

Utah does have a bitumen like crude oil at the surface in several places, this has been historically used as asphalt for roads though it is actually low in asphaltenes. A company (which seems more like a sham) I have worked with to try to economically strip mine then extract the oil from the rock and sand has not successfully done so yet. The assay of that source shows low metals content, low sulfur content, high diesel, kerosene (jet fuel), and base oil fractions. In all a very excellent and desirable crude oil if extracted (using proprietary solvent/condensate mixture)

Depends on depth. There is a motherload of tight shale crude in Nevada but its very deep thus uneconomical to drill and produce. There is also a lot in California but it has high silica content so need hydrofluoric acid in the frac water and attempts to drill and produce it have not yielded commercial success.

You oil drilling baws really don't understand that tight shale crude is really not that desirable by refineries. same formation, same pad will have several different high metals content, while some has high paraffin wax content that pipelines don't want at all and will pay maybe $40 for
This post was edited on 3/8/23 at 8:07 am
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37457 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:07 am to
You really seem like you know your shite
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90502 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:10 am to
Sounds more like fear mongering. Wells slow down and there hasn’t been much invested into exploration and drilling.

As soon as exploration and drilling resume they’ll find more
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
9355 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:11 am to
quote:

There's some inventory in places, but the Bakken and Eagleford are well past peak.


The problem with Eagleford is that refineries really don't want it except for blending before refining. They are already taking as much as they dare to without losing significant nameplate capacity in the crude unit. Exxon is about to commission its 250k BPD unit specifically designed for this light stuff. You won't get higher value petcoke from it at all for refining bottom lines.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21165 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:23 am to
quote:

There is a motherload of tight shale crude in Nevada but its very deep thus uneconomical to drill and produce.


Hence its appears there will come a point in time where the decision must be made to progress even further in this energy transition, become more reliant on foreign imports, and/or figure out how to economically produce that stuff. I’ve learned not to doubt the intelligence and abilities of this industry to advance technologies to make before thought not economics or possible operations suddenly profitable. Done by people WAY smarter than I could ever hope to be.

The bigger question might be the politics by then. I haven’t looked much at what portions of Nevada is covered by that potential play, but would be curious how much on private land, any state lands, or Fed/BLM. What would the process look like in trying to secure a State of Nevada drill permit or a Federal APD from the local office in Nevada?
This post was edited on 3/8/23 at 8:29 am
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
9292 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:34 am to
quote:

What this article is about is Tight Shale oil not shale oil. There is a big difference.

You do this in every thread about shale oil and it’s so pedantic.

Just about everyone in the US O&G industry refers to LTO as “shale oil,” at least informally.
This post was edited on 3/8/23 at 8:35 am
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
65533 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:37 am to
quote:

John Kruk truck nut
My uncle (no homo) is in Kruk’s inner circle.

Kruk’s a good dude.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram