Started By
Message

re: WSJ: U.S. Shale Boom Shows Signs of Peaking

Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:48 am to
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25357 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:48 am to
Clearly isn’t so dire if they aren’t taking their chances with TMS.
Posted by mrservon
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
438 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 8:57 am to
quote:

I have put my hands on the only refinery built to refine it. This was after it was dissembled and in a laydown yard in the Houston area. Built in 1982, dismantled in 2011.


are you talking about the Sunoco refinery that was in New Jersey?
Posted by hubertcumberdale
Member since Nov 2009
6510 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 9:34 am to
quote:

That article is complete and total bullshite.



The top tier acreage in many of the basins is/has been drilled and operators are downspacing existing units and/or drilling up lower quality acreage, fact.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
9465 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 10:12 am to
quote:

are you talking about the Sunoco refinery that was in New Jersey?


It was a small refinery in the Rockies near the shale mines and on the river. Built by Oxy, I don't remember who owned it last. 20,000 BPD capacity. The shale was pulverized, retorted, then vapors went through the various refining processes.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
9465 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 10:14 am to
quote:

You do this in every thread about shale oil and it’s so pedantic.

Just about everyone in the US O&G industry refers to LTO as “shale oil,” at least informally.


Not everyone is in the oil patch biz who comes to TD, or reads these threads. As for the undesirability of much of the tight shale crude, that is well known in refining but not by oil patch baws. They don't really need to know more than how much the pipeline will pay for it.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
9465 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 10:23 am to
quote:

You really seem like you know your shite


I know barely enough to understand drilling. I buy and sell process equipment which has included an entire refinery, and some chemical plants. If I don't learn every single day, I will be left in the dust. I have been involved with GTL projects as well. I find it stupid that Velocys keeps being involved in almost all of those demonstration projects. Their reactors plug up easily regardless of the press releases. Yet the Russian oligarch backing them allows them to keep getting contracts like the plant to be built in NE Louisiana.

Here is something off topic. Money is being thrown right and left at "green" hydrogen. One EPC client who used to design and install (sometimes lease) propane storage and sytems to boost BTU value of natural gas power plants during cold snaps, has gotten into the green hydrogen game due all the money for it. He has designed and installed a few demonstration systems for municipalities up north. The supporters claim that natural gas can be distributed with 20% hydrogen. Per him, lucky to get 15%.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64223 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 10:30 am to
quote:

My uncle (no homo) is in Kruk’s inner circle.


Today I learned that John Kruk had an inner circle.

He’s always seemed like a pretty awesome guy.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
202921 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 10:47 am to
So how much land/water do we have left for exploration for oil???? 50 years worth?????
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37520 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 10:50 am to
quote:

So how much land/water do we have left for exploration for oil???? 50 years worth?????


How much are you willing to pay for a barrel?
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
9465 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 10:57 am to
I don't know but it is all about cost to produce it seems. Unita in Utah should heat up before the RR is completed, to get 700k BPD or so. That is some really nice crude to refine but not pipeline friendly even when cut by 50% with condensate.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
202921 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 11:00 am to
Should that be the matter here. I wonder how much WE have left. I don’t see a reason it should cost more just because we do it ourselves. We should never pay over 2.50 per gallon for gas.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37520 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Should that be the matter here.


Yes. There is an absolute abundance of oil all over this country and world, but some places it is very expensive to extract as it isn’t just in these giant underground pools waiting for Jethro to shoot a 30-06 and create a well.

quote:

I wonder how much WE have left.


I’m just absolute volume? Probably 100 years or more at current usage rates. They are finding new oil every day, it’s just is it profitable to extract and transport to refining.

quote:

I don’t see a reason it should cost more just because we do it ourselves.


Shale and fracking is more expensive than what the saudis, Venezuelans, and Iranians can do. While our volumes may be greater, theirs is easier to access and pipe out.
This post was edited on 3/8/23 at 11:22 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21249 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 11:44 am to
quote:

We should never pay over 2.50 per gallon for gas.


Even as inflation rises and it becomes more expensive to produce the same barrels? Even as wages and costs of equipment rise?
Posted by mrservon
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2007
438 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Money is being thrown right and left at "green" hydrogen.


you ain't lying about that. it blows my mind about how much money is being thrown at all of these "green" & "blue" hydrogen & ammonia plant projects in South LA alone.

The ammonia I sort of understand because there is, and always will be, a strong market for it here in the US & beyond. It's just such a versatile feedstock. It's the H2 play offshoots that I can't seem to wrap my head around. It's being labeled as the all-encompassing "renewable fuels initiative". But It's not for fuel cells in lieu of motor fuels or transportation. We are nowhere near there yet. It can't all be for alternative power sources for industrial applications. (ie. chemical plants, refining units, etc.) Then we would be seeing a shite-ton of capital investment in Hydrogen conversion projects at the proposed end users. And we just aren't seeing it.

What is creating all of this demand for Hydrogen production??
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37520 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

What is creating all of this demand for Hydrogen production??


Fertilizer
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
38521 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 12:21 pm to
There will be a big push the next 10 years to tap out the top tier acerage and cash out before companies make the shift to renewable investments. This isn’t just a US shale strategy. These next 10 years may actually be the last peak for oil.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
66805 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

The top tier acreage in many of the basins is/has been drilled and operators are downspacing existing units and/or drilling up lower quality acreage, fact.


there is both truth and lies in this statement.
Posted by Topo Chico
Houston
Member since Apr 2019
445 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 1:00 pm to
I wouldn't say shale is peaking but rather that operators and their equity partners are behaving more responsibly with their capital. The days of the buy, delineate, flip are over. Operators now have to prove they can create value through the wellhead.

Locations have reduced, though, as the relationship between child/parent wells have become more apparent and EURs haven't matched the original type curves.
Posted by Motownsix
Boise
Member since Oct 2022
1982 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 1:03 pm to
Does this article really pretend that the crash in 2015 didn’t happen? 600+ U.S. energy companies went bankrupt. Billions in not trillions of investment dollars were lost. There was no such thing as a wise investment in US energy between 2016-2019. That cheap Saudi oil killed our energy sector.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
9465 posts
Posted on 3/8/23 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

Fertilizer


Desulfured fuels and lubricants.

Lots of specialty chemicals some even needed to drill for oil.

The "Hydrogen Economy" is to partially replace natural gas as a methane/hydrogen mixture say 85/15 content for you home and for power plants presently burning natural gas
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram