- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would a child ever ask their mom if she could squirt?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:42 am to shel311
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:42 am to shel311
So you just completely disregard the science of bio-analytical testing that showed it to be urine and the ultrasound showing it was the emptying of the bladder? You think these scientists are just making shite up, just to be able to shame people for liking golden showers?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:43 am to Oates Mustache
"trust the science bro"
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:46 am to Oates Mustache
quote:
So you just completely disregard the science of bio-analytical testing that showed it to be urine and the ultrasound showing it was the emptying of the bladder? You think these scientists are just making shite up, just to be able to shame people for liking golden showers?
You're upsetting the sensibilities of those that believe their sexual prowess has unlocked a mysterious biological function and not the reality that they screwed some hoes with poor bladder control.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:47 am to Blaeke
Their magic wangs created a new biological function! They turn piss into lube!
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:49 am to Deep Purple Haze
quote:
wiyf lube?
Clearly, the magic squirt that I created.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 9:52 am to Oates Mustache
have u measured the viscosity of the magic juice?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 10:15 am to shel311
quote:No. That is intentional.
Is it just coincidence that no woman has ever been filmed doing so while slightly dehydrated?
Porn stars drink shitloads of water before filming those scenes.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 10:23 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
You don't need to tell me what a woman squirts. I need a woman to tell me what she squirts.
Florence Boitrelle, Amélie Gauquelin, and Lydia Malagrida already told you that it was scientifically proven to be piss.
That's 3 women right there
Posted on 8/11/22 at 10:49 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
It would help if we had a woman commenting on this post. It's very male centric.
Where is Tigergirl when when need him—-I meant her
Posted on 8/11/22 at 10:51 am to Oates Mustache
quote:tRuSt Da ScIeNcE
So you just completely disregard the science of bio-analytical testing t
Posted on 8/11/22 at 11:07 am to schatman
quote:
Regardless, doesn’t smell like piss. And has a lubricant feel to it.
Concur with the non-piss camp.
Interesting that the non-piss camp all have a similar description while others saying it is piss are likely going off what they see in porn.
Adding to the description for the first hand accounts, it actually has a metallic smell to it. Definitely NOT a urine smell (along with the different viscosity).
This post was edited on 8/11/22 at 11:35 am
Posted on 8/11/22 at 11:12 am to KwoodTiger
Your personal anecdote doesn't trump the actual science. It's amazing how some of you just dismiss it. Read the damn studies, you fools.
They freaking recording it with an ultrasound and it clearly showed during the "squirt", the bladder emptied. You guys are seriously something else.
They freaking recording it with an ultrasound and it clearly showed during the "squirt", the bladder emptied. You guys are seriously something else.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 11:23 am to Oates Mustache
the study linked had 7 women in it. 7 people for anything is not a good sample. 7 women who would voluntarily masturbate in front of scientists is an even worse sample . At that point, you've probably filtered your study to women who have squirting weirdly integrated with their entire sexual identity.
The explanation in the most recent study sounds the most likely to be accurate to me:
The explanation in the most recent study sounds the most likely to be accurate to me:
quote:
Women expel fluids of various quantities and compositions from the urethra during sexual arousal and orgasm. These are classified as either female ejaculation (FE) or squirting (SQ). The aim of our analysis was to present evidence that FE and SQ are similar but etiologically different phenomena. A review of studies was performed on fluids expelled from the urogenital tract during female sexual activities using the Web of Knowledge™ (Web of Science Core Collection) and MEDLINE (Ovid) databases from 1946 to 2021. Until 2011, all female orgasmic expulsions of fluids were referred to as FE. The fluid was known to be either from the paraurethral glands or as a result of coital incontinence. At present, SQ is considered as a transurethral expulsion of approximately 10 milliliters or more of transparent fluid, while FE is considered as a secretion of a few milliliters of thick fluid. The fluid in SQ is similar to urine and is expelled by the urinary bladder. The secretion in FE originates from the paraurethral glands and contains a high concentration of prostate-specific antigen. Both phenomena can occur simultaneously. The mechanisms underlying SQ and FE are entirely different. SQ is a massive transurethral orgasmic expulsion from the urinary bladder, while FE is the secretion of a very small amount of fluid from the paraurethral glands.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 11:38 am to el duderino III
Dude, they had the women empty their bladders before the study. They then watched on the ultrasound the bladders fill then empty during "squirting". They then tested the "squirt" and to no one's surprise, it's PISS with a fractional amount of skene's gland fluid. In every single one.
You guys going out of your way to change the truth are amazing. Just admit you like getting peed on, it's 2022. Embrace your freak, you might even get to control our nuclear waste program.
You guys going out of your way to change the truth are amazing. Just admit you like getting peed on, it's 2022. Embrace your freak, you might even get to control our nuclear waste program.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 12:14 pm to Oates Mustache
Oates, I always like your posts and we agree on a lot- especially the freakshow PhantomMenace. But this is where we'll agree to disagree. I'm sure a lot of what is seen on the internet is urine. However, I defy you to fins one guy that's experienced this that thinks it's predominantly urine. That would be unpleasant, and I doubt many would be into it. The viscosity, taste, and scent is something completely different. I'd imagine most guys are skeptical but when it happens, they are believers.
Posted on 8/11/22 at 12:24 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
Would a child ever ask their mom if she could squirt?
mmmmbeer signaled
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:54 pm to Oates Mustache
quote:
Read the damn studies, you fools.
Female ejaculation and squirting as similar but completely different phenomena: A narrative review of current research
“Abstract
Women expel fluids of various quantities and compositions from the urethra during sexual arousal and orgasm. These are classified as either female ejaculation (FE) or squirting (SQ). The aim of our analysis was to present evidence that FE and SQ are similar but etiologically different phenomena. A review of studies was performed on fluids expelled from the urogenital tract during female sexual activities using the Web of Knowledge™ (Web of Science Core Collection) and MEDLINE (Ovid) databases from 1946 to 2021. Until 2011, all female orgasmic expulsions of fluids were referred to as FE. The fluid was known to be either from the paraurethral glands or as a result of coital incontinence. At present, SQ is considered as a transurethral expulsion of approximately 10 milliliters or more of transparent fluid, while FE is considered as a secretion of a few milliliters of thick fluid. The fluid in SQ is similar to urine and is expelled by the urinary bladder. The secretion in FE originates from the paraurethral glands and contains a high concentration of prostate-specific antigen. Both phenomena can occur simultaneously. The mechanisms underlying SQ and FE are entirely different. SQ is a massive transurethral orgasmic expulsion from the urinary bladder, while FE is the secretion of a very small amount of fluid from the paraurethral glands.”
Fools too I guess
Posted on 8/11/22 at 3:59 pm to CrimsonTideMD
quote:
FE was objectively evidenced only in tens of cases
You were saying?
Posted on 8/11/22 at 4:00 pm to CrimsonTideMD
quote:
very small amount of fluid
Yeah, it’s never a lot. That’s another reason I didn’t think it was piss.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News