- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Woman in Minnesota tried ramming ICE Officer gets unalived. NSFW
Posted on 1/8/26 at 11:49 am to kywildcatfanone
Posted on 1/8/26 at 11:49 am to kywildcatfanone
The same people stockpiling guns to defend against a tyrannical government now insist that if a federal agent gives you an order, you either comply or die.
Make it make sense
Make it make sense
Posted on 1/8/26 at 11:52 am to WicKed WayZ
Don't waste your lunch break arguing here. Go outside and get some air.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 11:53 am to HogBalls
What a whacky neighborhood…
Google Maps Link
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Google Maps Link
This post was edited on 1/8/26 at 11:59 am
Posted on 1/8/26 at 11:56 am to coonass27
quote:
I’m not saying she was trying to run the cop over. She may not have seen him. However she put the cop as well as whomever else standing in the street in grave danger with her actions weither she saw him or not. Intentional or not, does not take the cops right to defend himself as he did. It’s just like people trying to run away from a Robery in a car and get shot by the cop standing in their path. It sounds very shallow but play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Nailed it.
If I HAD to guess, I’d say she panicked and made some emotional and crazed decision. She’s a liberal, lesbian, single mom. Putting it bluntly, she’s probably some extremely impulsive and irrational person. My gut says she wasn’t trying to run over anybody…but who knows intent? She’s dead, so we will never truly find out her motives for decisions made in a split second.
What we do know is that she spent a day following, and presumably harassing, armed enforcement personnel that were trying to do a job. It doesn’t matter if you agree with them, hate them, and hate any and all political ideals associated with the movement. Simply put, she inserted herself into a dangerous situation where loaded weapons were present. She fricked up.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 11:56 am to TDTOM
Posted on 1/8/26 at 11:57 am to WicKed WayZ
quote:
if a federal agent gives you an order, you either comply or die.
Had she complied she would still be here. Why did she try to run over them? They were not attacking her, just trying to talk to her and get her out of the road. Seems everything was reasonable till she tried to run over him.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:01 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
The same people stockpiling guns to defend against a tyrannical government now insist that if a federal agent gives you an order, you either comply or die.
You’re trying to put everything into a box. This is more complex than that. Here is a list of her mistakes:
1. Following and harassing officers
2. Using her vehicle to block pursuing officers
3. Reversing said vehicle
4. Not getting out of the vehicle
5. Pushing the gas in the vague direction of an armed officer
She could have easily gotten out of bed, taken her kid to school, gone to work (
Even if officers didn’t follow correct procedure on issue #4, it is wise to get out of the vehicle and live to fight another day. There’s plenty of video evidence if you want to lawyer up and sue based on your perceived “rights” in that situation.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:04 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
no chance. dude is dug in. I look forward to every new post this radical makes.
He is an absolute asshat.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:06 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
Sorry I’m the only one holding a murderer accountable
quote:
But this is always you’re go to, boot licker
You’re being overly emotional and irrational at this point. Your refusal to acknowledge any other perspective is why you’re getting shelled in this thread.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:18 pm to TexasTiger08
quote:And that same poster said this about 6 hours ago.
You’re being overly emotional and irrational at this point. Your refusal to acknowledge any other perspective is why you’re getting shelled in this thread.
quote:
But people don’t want any nuance in the conversation
Talk about a complete lack of self awareness.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:39 pm to HogBalls
For those who are trying to blame the officer for not learning about standing in front during a stop after the first time he supposedly got run over, he didn’t actually get run over by the front of vehicle while standing in front of it the first time; and it was his arm getting caught in the vehicle after busting an illegal’s side/back window out to open door and detain the uncooperative illegal. He seems to have done this from the side and then with arm stuck was dragged by the illegal attempting to flee.
From that experience once the driver put vehicle into drive and gave it gas I can see how he would be concerned with his safety being in front of vehicle that starts to flee but also for the safety of the officer who was reaching into the vehicle to get the woman out. She put both officers in danger not just the shooting officer.
He was also pictured holding a phone in one hand at times, and before the other ICE officers pulled up he filming the other woman film him (possibly the wife filming her partner about to cause trouble for ICE). Some have said filming is also what it looked like he was doing when walking back over before the driver put it in drive and floored it towards him which is when he first pulled out his gun. That would fit as the “wife” or whatever was filming from the outside along the passenger side of the vehicle.
Until the driver put it in drive and started to accelerate it towards him and the other officer partially in car it doesn’t seem like he was expecting the need to draw his weapon or even defend himself against the woman and her car. She instigated the incident regardless of her intentions being to assault or to flee, and the first shot was only fired after the assault with vehicle on the officers had occurred.
quote:
The ICE agent who opened fire in Minneapolis Wednesday was dragged 100 yards by an illegal migrant in Minnesota last June after his arm was trapped inside the vehicle during a traffic stop, The Post can reveal.
The attack on the officer, whom The Post is not naming, happened June 17 in Bloomington, Minnesota, when ICE agents conducted a traffic stop on Roberto Carlos Munoz-Guatemala, a serial illegal immigrant with a lengthy rap sheet with charges including domestic assault and sex crimes against an underage teenager, according to records.
Munoz-Guatemala refused to exit his vehicle when officers approached his car, and the officer broke the back window in order to open the vehicle from the inside.
The suspect then sped away with the ICE agent’s arm caught between the seat and the car frame, according to the Justice Department.
Prosecutors said he was violently dragged more than 100 yards as the suspect weaved back and forth in an attempt to shake him loose from the car.
The agent was hospitalized with “significant injuries to his arm and hand” but made a full recovery, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement at the time.
Munoz-Guatemala was arrested and charged with assaulting the officer and was convicted by a federal jury last month.
From that experience once the driver put vehicle into drive and gave it gas I can see how he would be concerned with his safety being in front of vehicle that starts to flee but also for the safety of the officer who was reaching into the vehicle to get the woman out. She put both officers in danger not just the shooting officer.
He was also pictured holding a phone in one hand at times, and before the other ICE officers pulled up he filming the other woman film him (possibly the wife filming her partner about to cause trouble for ICE). Some have said filming is also what it looked like he was doing when walking back over before the driver put it in drive and floored it towards him which is when he first pulled out his gun. That would fit as the “wife” or whatever was filming from the outside along the passenger side of the vehicle.
Until the driver put it in drive and started to accelerate it towards him and the other officer partially in car it doesn’t seem like he was expecting the need to draw his weapon or even defend himself against the woman and her car. She instigated the incident regardless of her intentions being to assault or to flee, and the first shot was only fired after the assault with vehicle on the officers had occurred.
This post was edited on 1/8/26 at 1:49 pm
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:44 pm to WicKed WayZ
I find it interesting how people on this board were up in arms about that chick shot during the Jan 6 protest.
Yet completely absolve this fed of any wrongdoing.
Yet completely absolve this fed of any wrongdoing.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:49 pm to HogBalls
Vice President Vance is live right now doing a WH Press Briefing laying out the facts and slaying the cuck left wing media. It’s great
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:50 pm to brass2mouth
quote:They're ok with it now because a liberal died instead of an insurrectionist. Not hard to comprehend.
I find it interesting how people on this board were up in arms about that chick shot during the Jan 6 protest.
Yet completely absolve this fed of any wrongdoing.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:52 pm to Harry Caray
One was armed with a 4,500 pound car and the other was unarmed, but don't let that get in the way of the narrative.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:52 pm to brass2mouth
Did the dude even drop his cell phone during this harrowing near-death ramming he practically skipped away from?
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:53 pm to HogBalls
Thread stats to this point.
Klark Kent -> Posts: 48 Votes: 112
WicKed WayZ -> Posts: 48 Votes: -280
NawlinsTiger9 -> Posts: 44 Votes: -137
Harry Caray -> Posts: 36 Votes: -501
ell_13 -> Posts: 35 Votes: 226
TDTOM -> Posts: 26 Votes: 73
SUB -> Posts: 21 Votes: 165
mmmmmbeeer -> Posts: 20 Votes: -190
Pettifogger -> Posts: 19 Votes: 115
hawgfaninc -> Posts: 18 Votes: 71
Klark Kent -> Posts: 48 Votes: 112
WicKed WayZ -> Posts: 48 Votes: -280
NawlinsTiger9 -> Posts: 44 Votes: -137
Harry Caray -> Posts: 36 Votes: -501
ell_13 -> Posts: 35 Votes: 226
TDTOM -> Posts: 26 Votes: 73
SUB -> Posts: 21 Votes: 165
mmmmmbeeer -> Posts: 20 Votes: -190
Pettifogger -> Posts: 19 Votes: 115
hawgfaninc -> Posts: 18 Votes: 71
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:56 pm to WicKed WayZ
quote:
The same people stockpiling guns to defend against a tyrannical government now insist that if a federal agent gives you an order, you either comply or die.
Make it make sense
Using vehicles as weapons with the intent to harm officers of the law goes way beyond "comply or die".
If she had been in handcuffs on the sidewalk and was being told to sit and refused, and then was shot, I would agree with you.
That isn't what happened. She willingly endangered the life of another human being through her poor decision-making ability.
The lives of law enforcement aren't of less value simply because you don't like the law they are enforcing.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:58 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
They need to bring charges against Waltz and the mayor, who are supposed to help calm people down, instead flaming the flames, which will cause more destruction and death.
I think Waltz is about to have some other charges before too long. It’s being reported that the DOJ has received a criminal referral for Walz and for state AG related to the Somali fraud scandals in Minnesota.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 1:00 pm to dallastigers
quote:
From that experience once the driver put vehicle into drive and gave it gas I can see how he would be concerned with his safety being in front of vehicle that starts to flee but also for the safety of the officer who was reaching into the vehicle to get the woman out. She put both officers in danger not just the shooting officer.
From that experience I would’ve guess that he and/or his department would’ve had training on extricating people from vehicles and the importance/dangers of doing so when the vehicle isn’t immobilized.
I’m not going to die on the hill of this being a good shoot or not.
I am going to die on the hill that this incident is a direct result of poorly trained officers that we as a society allow.
Popular
Back to top


6









