Started By
Message

re: Why can't we get a compact, 4 cylinder diesel pickup here in the US?

Posted on 1/19/19 at 8:55 am to
Posted by WoWyHi
Member since Jul 2009
23339 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Like the 2.8L 4cyl Colorado or Canyon?


Those are not compact trucks though. And what's the mileage on that engine? I'm wanting something like the VW Passat or Jetta for mileage.
Posted by WoWyHi
Member since Jul 2009
23339 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Has a 4.3L in it too.


That engine would burn the tires off. Man I loved that engine.
Posted by Topisawtiger
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2012
3493 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 8:56 am to
I have a 2000 Ford Ranger I got from my parents two years ago. 3.0L V-6 with a manual transmission. 87,000 miles and runs like a top. MPG is only 20 on the highway though. Big ole tires. Get asked to sell it all the time.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32096 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 8:59 am to
quote:


I still have a 2003 one for light work on the farm. Has a 4.3L in it too.


In hindsight, The 4.3L V6 in a truck the size of an S-10 was a bit dangerous.

Those things were little rockets.
Posted by UltimaParadox
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
40859 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:01 am to
quote:

The new Ford truck, which some speculate could be called the Courier will be front-wheel drive but will expand globally to include markets such as the U.S., according to a social media post for a Ford engineer. In addition to the information from the post, a source at Ford tells us that development is tied to the development of the Transit Connect and that the new truck will have a wheelbase that is between 120 and 122 inches—which is very similar to the 120.6-inch wheelbase of the current Transit Connect LWB


quote:

This should put the wheelbase of the truck at about half a foot shorter than the Ranger and make it in line with a first generation Honda Ridgeline, or an early 2000s Toyota Tacoma


Jalopnik on Ford unibody truck
This post was edited on 1/19/19 at 9:03 am
Posted by bayou choupique
the banks of bayou choupique
Member since Oct 2014
1818 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:02 am to
My podna growing up had the 4.3 in a single cab s10 with the 5 speed manual. It was a fun truck.
Posted by Them
People's Republic of Bozeman
Member since Nov 2008
11132 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:03 am to
Doesn’t exist, sadly. The CanyoRado Duramax is the most fuel efficient truck you can buy, I think. That, or maybe a 2WD SuperCab F150 PowerStroke. That’ll touch 30 highway I think, with real V6 diesel power
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32096 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:03 am to
quote:

Mitsubishi Raider was the last of the true construction worker personal pickups.


I think it was called the Mitsubishi Mighty Max back then.

The problem with those Japanese compacts from the 1980s and 1990s were not that they weren’t reliable. They were. They were also prone to rusting out very easily. That reputation ruined them in the midwestern and northern states where roads are salted in the winter.
This post was edited on 1/19/19 at 9:14 am
Posted by McVick
Member since Jan 2011
4467 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:13 am to
My very limited understanding of the situation is this:

25% import tax on light trucks dating back to the Johnson Administration, AKA the Chicken Tax

American manufacturers fear light duty trucks would harm one of their most profitable products, the Class 2 Light Truck (F-150, Silverado 1500, Ram 1500).

EPA Emission Standards for diesel-powered vehicles are stricter than other countries that manufacture or import light trucks.

American manufacturers do have not shown a commitment to R&D for a diesel-powered engine which would meet or exceed EPA emission standards in a light truck smaller than their profitable products.

It would appear the Big Three could lobby for reducing emission standards to start producing diesel-powered light trucks but there is a fear that the foreign manufacturers (Toyota, VW, etc.) would dominate the US domestic market because the foreign manufacturers are far ahead in R&D and could commit to manufacturing plants in the US faster than the Big Three.

I expect someone to refute some or all of my thoughts, and encourage others to bring more information to the discussion so we can better understand why the light, compact trucks so popular around the world have not and are not available in the US.
Posted by FlagLake
"Da Ship"
Member since Feb 2006
2340 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:21 am to
Had the Dodge version of the Mighty Max which was called the Ram 50. Loved that truck. Could load my four wheeler in the back and close the tailgate plus put me and two of my buddies in the front. Lots of leg room for a small truck.
Posted by Tigerpaw123
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2007
17261 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:32 am to
I don’t not see the draw for diesel
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
23462 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:34 am to
Posted by 31TIGERS
Mike’s habitat
Member since Dec 2004
7219 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:34 am to
quote:

EPA Emission Standards for diesel-powered vehicles are stricter than other countries that manufacture or import light trucks.


And a big FU and LOL at the libtarded tree huggers that think America is behind other countries when it comes to vehicle emmissions. Leave it to the liberals to ruin everything.
Posted by ryan_heck
Member since Aug 2017
1 post
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:35 am to
I lived in Costa Rica for a few years and had a 3L turbo diesel Toyota Hilux Crew Cab 4x4. Slightly bigger than Tacoma but smaller than a Tundra.

I've had 6 different trucks over the years.

The Hilux is hands down is the best truck I've ever owned.

I think they'd sell like hotcakes here in US. I looked hard into importing in back to Louisiana but no dice.

They make more money selling larger trucks. I don't believe they want to eat into their profits.
This post was edited on 1/19/19 at 9:42 am
Posted by arcalades
USA
Member since Feb 2014
19276 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:38 am to
quote:

If you don’t got 8, you ain’t straight
I have an 8 but I wish I still had a 6. What do I need 8 for? Nothing. It's like you people just love throwing all your money down the drain so you can beat your chest for driving a 60K truck.
Posted by HooDooWitch
TD Bronze member
Member since Sep 2009
10270 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:42 am to
Diesel Canyon / Colorado have been available for a few years now.



Congrats on coming out of your coma!
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:43 am to
And the diesel is not available in the bottom trim trucks. It is not an economy option.

It should be available in the bottom trim half ton trucks as an economic commuter option and the colorado/canyon should go away.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:45 am to
Honest question...could an American go to Mexico and buy one to bring back?
Posted by umop_apisdn
Member since Sep 2017
3673 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:46 am to
diesel pickups make sense for pulling or hauling heavy loads.

What are you gonna do with a mini diesel pick up? Haul mulch?
I just don't see the need.
Posted by dragginass
Member since Jan 2013
2745 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 9:46 am to
The answer is emissions certification costs.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram