Started By
Message

re: Why can't we get a compact, 4 cylinder diesel pickup here in the US?

Posted on 1/19/19 at 2:24 pm to
Posted by WoWyHi
Member since Jul 2009
23339 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

I dont need a 1/2 ton but I drive one because I couldnt see paying the same price for a mid size as a full size. I


I think there are more of us out there than people think but we don't have options so we buy full size.
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76276 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 3:03 pm to
quote:

Later this year GMC will have to more engines available in the Sierra, 300HP 4cyl Turbo


Why’d they do a 4 cyl ? Just doesn’t sound right.
Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
8636 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 7:10 pm to
Honestly, what is a “true compact”?
Posted by WoWyHi
Member since Jul 2009
23339 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 7:26 pm to
To me, it's the 90's Isuzu pup, Dodge D50, Ford Ranger, and Chevy S10.
Posted by CHEDBALLZ
South Central LA
Member since Dec 2009
21918 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 7:28 pm to
Ford Ranger
Mazda B2200
Mitzubishi
Posted by WoWyHi
Member since Jul 2009
23339 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 7:30 pm to
Yeah the Mazda and Mitsubishi are the Ranger and D50. The D50 had a 4 cylinder Mitsubishi engine and was built by Mitsubishi.
Posted by CHEDBALLZ
South Central LA
Member since Dec 2009
21918 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 7:34 pm to
If I could buy a brand new one of any of those for under $20,000 id be at the dealership Monday AM

I need it to pull my aluminum hull and carry some wood every once in a while.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34647 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

Lots of people used to buy comparatively small Rangers, S-10s, Tacomas, and Frontiers back in the '90s and early '00s.


Hell, the SCCA had a road-racing series for those little 4-cylinder trucks.
Posted by Badman
West Monroe, LA
Member since Nov 2009
2703 posts
Posted on 1/19/19 at 8:04 pm to
I just started looking for an old, pre Hardbody Nissan like I had in high school. Longbed. Z24 engine. That little truck was unstoppable.
Posted by Barbellthor
Columbia
Member since Aug 2015
8636 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 10:03 am to
I mean the new Colorados and canyons are obviously bigger, but the old style were definitely compact. Basically were S10’s. I honestly miss them like that.
Posted by Supermoto Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2010
9927 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 10:08 am to
quote:

just need a small truck for smaller projects, and a 4 cylinder diesel to get great mileage.

But diesel cost more...what's the point??
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
66763 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 11:51 am to
At 45mpg it pays off for a commuter
Posted by WoWyHi
Member since Jul 2009
23339 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

But diesel cost more...what's the point??


This is completely ignoring the fact that many years at a time, gas cost more. In 2014, gas was over $3 a gallon and diesel was $2.49. Diesel is not always more expensive. Matter of fact, the price seems more stable, long term.
Posted by JayDeerTay84
Texas
Member since May 2013
9847 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 12:14 pm to
The Colorado has a Diesel option.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64524 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 1:34 pm to
I think one main reason you don’t see more small Diesel engines designed for personal vehicles is concern on the manufacturer’s part that the rigorous emissions standards the government has already imposed on commercial Diesel engines will be applied to these.

Ever increasing emissions regulations are why Caterpillar decided some years ago to get out of the over the road truck engine market. They saw that to meet the emissions standards set, they’d not be able to build an engine that still met Cat’s quality standards and be profitable.

As for the impact on industrial engines (generators, drill rigs, etc.) and earth moving equipment engines (track type tractors, excavators, etc), the “Tier IV Final” emissions standards necessities the addition of an extremely expensive and complacted emissions after treatment system. These systems add thousands, sometimes tens of thousands, of dollars in initial expense at time of purchase. Then on top of this, these systems are quite maintenance intensive and highly expensive to repair. And what’s worse, these systems do absolutely nothing to improve the life or performance of the engine in any way.

One good example I recently encounted was a drilling company who has a Cat C18 engine in one of their drills. The engine is a little over six years old. As of this time last year when their “regen” problems started, the engine had just over 8,000 hours on it. Between January of last year and this month they’ve put on an additional roughly 2,000 hours. But over that timespan they’ve had six repairs to the regen system that totals of $24,700. That’s $24,700 they’ve had to spend on a system that doesn’t do anything for them. But, being that there are no other options they have no choice but to fork out this money.

I understand the smaller regen system in an automotive engine would be far less expensive than on these big industrial engines. But they’d still add a huge cost both up front and during the life of the vehicle. Auto manufacturers realize this and thus, I believe this is one main reason they’re not producing small Diesel engines. They’re afraid the government will do to the automotive diesel market what they’ve done to the industrial diesel market. And unlike the customer in the industrial Diesel engine market, customers in the automotive diesel market do have other options.
Posted by browl
North of BR
Member since Nov 2017
1571 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 4:44 pm to
I'd much rather have a small pickup with a V8 swap. First generation ranger with a five-oh HO or better yet a chevy 350.

Back to the discussion. They won't do it because the truck will MSRP for way more than its worth after they have to kill it with EPA requirements so it will comply with ULSD, b20 or greater, nox, idle quality, etc. Might be cheaper to buy a decent old truck exempt from emissions and complete a 4bt swap.
Posted by Hu_Flung_Pu
Central, LA
Member since Jan 2013
22163 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 5:12 pm to
I'd rather my large truck with roughly the same mileage.

Posted by cajuncarguy
On the road...Again!
Member since Jun 2013
3135 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

Emissions and manufactures don’t want to offer diesels on base models. See the price of the F150 diesel.
Posted by johnnyrocket
Ghetto once known as Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2013
9790 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 7:56 pm to
I had an Isuzu 4x2 diesel pickup that I had that was used in the 1980's. I bought it used with 14,000 miles for $3,995 in the late 1980's from a co-worker. Used it for a year and it was a pretty reliable truck.

Sold it to my friend who was a commercial HVAC tech for what I paid for it.
He used it for 10 years and finally sold it. He like that it was small and easy to get in tight parking spaces in areas with limited parking.

I think the price with all the safety features, emissions, and electronics would make this truck if mfg today cost more than a 1/2 ton full-size truck.
Posted by WoWyHi
Member since Jul 2009
23339 posts
Posted on 1/20/19 at 7:58 pm to
Sucks because an affordable compact truck would be awesome.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram