- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are K9s never charged with police brutality?
Posted on 8/5/19 at 11:04 am to Vegetative State
Posted on 8/5/19 at 11:04 am to Vegetative State
yeah! When are we going to start convicting automobiles for killing people!!!
0
Posted on 8/5/19 at 11:06 am to Brosef Stalin
quote:
but if you shoot one you're charged with killing a police officer, same as shooting a human
That is not true.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 11:09 am to Vegetative State
quote:
The law protects these dogs like they are cops, but too many times I've seen videos of these dogs still chewing on some guy's arm long after they stopped resisting arrest. Just seems like a double standard.
Are you really this fricking stupid? You does realize that the K9's are officers?
Posted on 8/5/19 at 11:09 am to Vegetative State
quote:
I've seen videos of these dogs still chewing on some guy's arm long after they stopped resisting arrest.
let the dog have some fun
quote:
I've seen videos
ever seen one that the dog shouldn't have bitten the suspect?
Posted on 8/5/19 at 11:28 am to Vegetative State
Cop shoots your dog, you get nothing it's just property.
Touch a police dog and you'll get assault on an officer of the law.
Touch a police dog and you'll get assault on an officer of the law.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 11:35 am to YouAre8Up
quote:
Are you really this fricking stupid? You does realize that the K9's are officers?
Why are they the only officers to get away with police brutality?
Posted on 8/5/19 at 11:38 am to Vegetative State
Did you not heed their warning to stop?
Posted on 8/5/19 at 11:48 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
It’s also why it’s retarded when people think their pets are just as important as real live human children. It’s just a fricking dog you losers.
Your kids are snot-nosed POS’s
This post was edited on 8/5/19 at 11:48 am
Posted on 8/5/19 at 12:15 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
If they were emotionally sane they wouldn’t be women.
I need to create an alter so I can upvote this again.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 12:30 pm to Vegetative State
quote:
Why are K9s never charged with police brutality?
Wow. I want this to be legit, but I'm sure it's not.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 12:37 pm to Vegetative State
Same reason you cannot enter a contract with one
Posted on 8/5/19 at 12:41 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Because canines are lesser beasts that we hold dominion over. It’s also why it’s retarded when people think their pets are just as important as real live human children. It’s just a fricking dog you losers.
I love everything about this post.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 12:44 pm to YouAre8Up
quote:One of my favorite parts of this site
Are you really this fricking stupid? You does realize that the K9's are officers?
Watching someone call another poster the dumbass when they themselves are the one missing the point and being an idiot
Posted on 8/5/19 at 12:45 pm to Vegetative State
Ignoring they fact that they are not human and that this is a ridiculous question.....
Dogs do not have the mental capability of possessing criminal intent.
Dogs do not have the mental capability of possessing criminal intent.
Posted on 8/5/19 at 12:47 pm to Indefatigable
quote:The OP is not ignoring that
Ignoring they fact that they are not human
That’s the entire point of this thread. They aren’t human, yet the law views them as human in once instance and not another
Posted on 8/5/19 at 12:52 pm to lsupride87
quote:
They aren’t human, yet the law views them as human in once instance and not another
No it doesn’t. They are not human and are not treated as such.
The reason behind elevated criminal charge for attacking police dogs is blatantly obvious and rooted in pragmatism. K-9’s are a major asset to police departments, the elevated punishment for harming a police dog has zero to do with emotion or considering the dog a human. It’s that way to discourage people from immediately shooting or harming the K-9’s.
Not to mention that the dogs operate as a tool or proxy for the officer, hence their imputed status as law enforcement. Shooting a police drone will get you a similar, higher punishment than popping your neighbors drone.
This post was edited on 8/5/19 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 8/5/19 at 12:55 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
For blatantly obvious reasons. K-9’s are a major asset to police departments, the elevated punishment for harming a police dog has zero to do with emotion or considering the dog a human. It’s that way to discourage people from immediately shooting or harming the K-9’s.
When that dog is on their arse nobody is thinking this
In fact, I’ll go further and say people having altercations with these dogs don’t even know this law exists
Posted on 8/5/19 at 12:56 pm to Vegetative State
quote:
I do condone most police brutality
Huh?
Posted on 8/5/19 at 1:00 pm to lsupride87
quote:
When that dog is on their arse nobody is thinking this
Do you want to bet?
What reason do you think departments have?
You seriously think those laws were enacted because dogs are cute?
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News