re: Why are K9s never charged with police brutality?

quote:

---

Brosef Stalin

but if you shoot one you're charged with killing a police officer, same as shooting a human

---

Let me put an end to this shite right now.

quote:

---

RS 14:102.8 — Injuring or killing of a police animal

§102.8. Injuring or killing of a police animal

A. Injuring or killing of a police animal is the intentional infliction of great bodily harm, permanent disability, or death upon a police animal.

B. As used in this Section: (1) "Police animal" means: (a) Any dog which is owned or the service of which is used by any state or local law enforcement agency for the principal purpose of aiding in the detection of criminal activity, enforcement of laws, or apprehension of offenders. (b) Any dog which is owned or the service of which is used by any public safety agency and which is trained in accordance with the standards of a national or regional search and rescue association to respond to instructions from its handler in the search for possibly deceased individuals and in the search and rescue of lost or missing individuals and which dog, together with its handler, is prepared to render search and rescue services at the request of a public safety agency. (c) Any horse which is used by a state or local law enforcement officer in the course of his official duty. (2) "Public safety agency" means any agency of the state or political subdivision of the state which provides or has authority to provide law enforcement, fire protection, emergency medical services, emergency preparedness services, or any other type of emergency services.

C. It shall be an affirmative defense to a prosecution under this Section when the injuring or killing of a police animal is committed with the reasonable belief by one not involved in or being apprehended for the commission of any offense or by one taken into custody that: (1) He is in imminent danger of losing his life or receiving great bodily harm and that the injuring or killing is necessary to save himself from that danger.(2) Another person not involved in or being apprehended for the commission of any offense is in imminent danger of losing his life or receiving great bodily harm and that the injury or killing is necessary to save that person from that danger. (3) His animal or other property not involved in the commission of any offense or in the apprehension of any person for an offense is in imminent danger of being destroyed or receiving grave injury or damage that may result in its destruction.

D.(1) Whoever commits the crime of injuring or killing of a police animal shall be fined not less than two thousand five hundred dollars nor more than three thousand five hundred dollars, or imprisoned with or without hard labor for not less than one year nor more than three years, or both.

(2) Upon a second or subsequent conviction, regardless of whether the second or subsequent offense occurred before or after the first conviction, the offender shall be fined not less than two thousand five hundred dollars and not more than three thousand five hundred dollars, or imprisoned with or without hard labor for not less than five years nor more than seven years, or both. E. In addition to the foregoing penalties, a person convicted under this Section may be ordered to make full restitution to the public safety agency suffering a financial loss from the injury or killing of a police animal. If a person ordered to make restitution pursuant to this Section is found to be indigent and therefore unable to make restitution in full at the time of conviction, the court shall order a periodic payment plan consistent with the person's financial ability.

---

quote:

---

fact, I’ll go further and say people having altercations with these dogs don’t even know this law exists

---

I’d take that bet. I’d wager that the overwhelmingly percentage of the population is aware of these law. They have been around a long time.


Either way, the OP’s question is still ridiculous.

Crimes can be committed against non-humans. However non-humans cannot commit crimes. So a dog could never be charged with a crime, regardless of any other consideration. An elevated sentence for harming a certain category of animal is not the same thing as considering the animal a human.

quote:

---

I've seen videos of these dogs still chewing on some guy's arm long after they stopped resisting arrest.

---

good, frick you for running, hiding, or resisting

quote:

---

Police dogs should be banned as an example of cruel and unusual punishment.

---

The police dog bite is the closest we will likely ever get to seeing expedited and justified punishment.

I love watching the police dogs turn even the toughest criminals into little bitches.

Because they are good boys.