Started By
Message

re: WHO lauds Sweden as a model for countries going forward in the fight against COVID-19

Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:00 am to
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
43087 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:00 am to
Consider too that Sweden’s economy is being hammered too. Their GDP has also declined in lindd Ed Ruth their European neighbors and their unemployment rate has also jumped.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112946 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:04 am to
quote:

Consider too that Sweden’s economy is being hammered too. Their GDP has also declined in lindd Ed Ruth their European neighbors and their unemployment rate has also jumped.

Yea, and I think some people think Sweden didn't lockdown so that means they just kept going about their business just like they did before this started, but that's not really the case either.
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
14344 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:08 am to
The main difference with Sweden's approach is that they have an actual strategy with an end game in mind. We'll have to see how it plays out. But at least they have a plan, and if it works they will be better off for it. For the life of me, I don't know what the end game is with our shut down strategy. What are we hoping to accomplish? Are we just praying that if we hide ling enough it will all go away?
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79881 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:10 am to
You can't have all your neighbors collapsing their economies and expect to be immune to it.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
43087 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:14 am to
quote:

You can't have all your neighbors collapsing their economies and expect to be immune to it.


True but wasn’t their intent to do better than their neighbors?
They are not.
I’m asking, if their death rates are demonstrably higher and their economy is not better than their neighbors, then what’s the point?
Perhaps they will do better in the future?
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9750 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:14 am to
quote:

The main difference with Sweden's approach is that they have an actual strategy with an end game in mind.



The main difference in almost all of Sweden's policies is that they have an actual big picture strategy.
Our policies, on the other hand, are mainly just a free for all, fly by the seat of your pants money grab.
This post was edited on 4/30/20 at 10:24 am
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36680 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:18 am to
Their death rate is still about 75%. Essentially anyone that could possibly die from Covid is definitely going to die.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88462 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Their death rate is still about 75%.
What.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112946 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:21 am to
quote:

The main difference with Sweden's approach is that they have an actual strategy with an end game in mind. We'll have to see how it plays out. But at least they have a plan, and if it works they will be better off for it. For the life of me, I don't know what the end game is with our shut down strategy. What are we hoping to accomplish? Are we just praying that if we hide ling enough it will all go away?

I think another issue in comparing is that Sweden is pretty small so it's easy to have a strategy for all.

In the US, we allow each state to dictate the strategy, so we have 50 different strategies it seems.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88462 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:21 am to
Which is why the Louisiana comparison is interesting.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
43087 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:27 am to
quote:


Which is why the Louisiana comparison is interesting.


Any objective review of the current La. situation shows that one size doesn’t fit all. Parts of La. are going well, other parts srdd Ed flat and some aren’t doing well. The call should be for a targeted approach and not one plan for all areas.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
36680 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:29 am to
quote:

What.


Out of those that officially tested positive 1 in 4 recovered and the rest have died.



Obviously there are more people that aren't accounted for, who knows how many, but the official numbers are awful.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:30 am to
quote:

the US, we allow each state to dictate the strategy, so we have 50 different strategies it seems.


However, federal aid is pretty much the endgame for states.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88462 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Obviously there are more people that aren't accounted for, who knows how many, but the official numbers are awful.
You are reading that graph wrong. It’s not based on total cases. It’s a total of ONLY the “recoveries” vs deaths. The country isn’t really counting any recoveries. There’s almost no way to. Check the graph with recoveries only vs new cases. 90% of the days are at zero.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88462 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:37 am to
And they’re not testing much at all. Just 20,300 confirmed cases. Almost 2500 deaths. That death rate is 12%. Completely unrealistic.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
78048 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 10:40 am to
quote:

At this point, we have to make sure the high risk people stay in, but shoot for herd immunity for those who won't get too sick.
I hate statements like “at this point”.

So, what exactly were we doing for the previous 2 months?

Was there some end game or goal that we were shooting for?

We wasted every single day after the point where we determined that we were not going to have overrun hospitals.

Complete waste of time.
Posted by JGWS7
Member since Apr 2020
193 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 12:37 pm to
You sure Trump didn't call it a dem hoax in late Feb? Then say 15 would soon be zero, then say it would magically disappear in April....now we know he was getting briefings as early as November, by the way THATS WHY ITS COVID 19, cause it was discovered in 2019, not that it's the 19th covid like youlls heroes Conway, Limbaugh.... As far as WHO, if we're firing them for fricking up, they should fire themselves, on Jan 24th. Trump tweeted out praises for China's hard work and transparency but supposedly we are mad at the WHO for taking the Chinese at their word....all youlls BS falls apart and will be done in November
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88462 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 12:38 pm to
My goodness what a melt.
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
37474 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 12:41 pm to
This post was edited on 6/10/20 at 1:18 pm
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
44412 posts
Posted on 4/30/20 at 1:12 pm to
quote:

You sure Trump didn't call it a dem hoax in late Feb? Then say 15 would soon be zero, then say it would magically disappear in April....now we know he was getting briefings as early as November, by the way THATS WHY ITS COVID 19, cause it was discovered in 2019, not that it's the 19th covid like youlls heroes Conway, Limbaugh.... As far as WHO, if we're firing them for fricking up, they should fire themselves, on Jan 24th. Trump tweeted out praises for China's hard work and transparency but supposedly we are mad at the WHO for taking the Chinese at their word....all youlls BS falls apart and will be done in November



first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram