Started By
Message

re: What is the reasoning behind these rogue judges letting criminals free?

Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:43 pm to
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84726 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

The left doesn't want to jail criminals


This is true. They used hide it. They’d at least pretend. They’d say “let’s focus on the violent criminals and put them in jail.” Not really anymore.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
122871 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:46 pm to
No, but their family members vote. That’s why Trudy White was running ads specifically catering to these folks just a decade or so ago.
Posted by chryso
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13761 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:49 pm to
We need to make judges personally liable if violent criminals commit more violent crimes after receiving unusually low penalties for previous violent crimes.
Posted by Good Times
Hill top in Tn
Member since Nov 2007
24865 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:53 pm to
Same question can be asked about “not snitching” in the hood. It’s US against THEM mentality.
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
38719 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:54 pm to
At this point I believe they want democrat voters to move to red states that have good economies so theu can take them over. It is the only thing that makes sense to me
Posted by UncleRuckus
Member since Feb 2013
10054 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:57 pm to
They’re not rogue. They get backed by liberals because they are so far left. Leftist love criminals
This post was edited on 5/4/26 at 2:59 pm
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
32888 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:03 pm to
To save anyone else who was curious the effort, bond was set at $525,000.

LINK
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
47808 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:04 pm to
when a black woman shaves her head you know she has been elevated to a position of authority
Posted by DCtiger1
Member since Jul 2009
11788 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill issued the following statement regarding the judge's ruling: "I too am utterly confused as to why the judge would let a murder suspect with a history of fleeing justice out on bail pending trial. I will continue pushing for more judicial accountability."
Posted by geauxpurple
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2014
17373 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

They were placed there by liberal politicians
In this particular case the judge was placed there by the electorate of the City of New Orleans which, given its track record, should not come as any surprise.
Posted by TeddyPadillac
Member since Dec 2010
30351 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:52 pm to
quote:


No, but their family members vote



criminals who go around killing people don't have family members who vote.



Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
16141 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:59 pm to
And there's this part:
quote:

The court denied ankle monitoring
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
3854 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:01 pm to
As someone that once supported the political apparatus that does this, I can explain it to you quite simply.

The goal is to defund your police, replace your DAs/Judges with leftists that are soft on crime, and "reduce racism" to focus on social justice. Sound great? Of course it does.

The actual goal? Chaos. The more the citizenry is terrorized by these demons, the more the populace will ask big brother to protect them. Except big brother does not want to protect some of you. This form of big brother wants many of you removed, eliminated, silenced.

So the next time another goon that should be in jail kills an innocent teenager in a mall, thank your local democrat voter. They want this and want more of it. Sorry the truth hurts.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
39277 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

This makes no sense. piece of shite criminals don't vote.

Their families that think they don’t do anything wrong and were arrested because of racism, sometimes do.
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
3854 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:04 pm to
quote:


1. force the system to break down
2. be the solution for broken down system


This guy gets it. Just wait until you see the progressive "solution".

JK - Many of you that live in BR are getting a small glimpse of what that looks like. Enjoy your inevitable third world status within a couple of generations.
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
3854 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

criminals who go around killing people don't have family members who vote.


If you can find their name in a "phone book", chances are good they are "voting".
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
32888 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

And there's this part:

That's actually apparently a point of contention. DA is saying it was denied, Court is saying it was granted. I don't have access to the Orleans court system to see who is right and who is wrong:

quote:

The court spokesperson said Judge Nandi Campbell set Lindsey's bond at $525,000 and ordered her to ankle monitoring and 24/7 house arrest.


I will say that "house arrest" using something like ShadowTrack (phone based monitoring) instead of GPS with a fence would be abjectly fricking retarded.
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
10355 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

We need to make judges personally liable if violent criminals commit more violent crimes after receiving unusually low penalties for previous violent crimes.

If that happened to one of my family members, she'd never have to worry about re-election. I'd make sure of it.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87372 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:20 pm to
Why an individual judge does it might be separate from why it's done as a progressive political practice. The same as a kid on a college campus really believing in the Palestinian cause.

But the reason it happens in the aggregate, and is influenced by Open Societies, Tides, etc. that fund the judges, is disruption and destabilization. "Criminal justice reform" is a way to attack the dichotomy of the criminal and the citizen, oppressors/oppressed, etc. and all the structures that "reinforce" that in their view.

"Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent" is true, but here, the mercy to the guilty part isn't really the focus. It's the cruelty to the innocent they're after. It's why Wren Collective and Open Societies keep doing this despite ample evidence of the harm coming to regular, good people. There is no question they go into it with eyes wide open - they want the fracturing, the discord, the dysfunction.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
35539 posts
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:31 pm to
There is no justification for letting an accused murderer leave the state for home confinement with no monitoring.

They don't let people who are on parole and have served their time leave the state without special permission.
This post was edited on 5/4/26 at 4:40 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram