- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is the reasoning behind these rogue judges letting criminals free?
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:43 pm to kywildcatfanone
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:43 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
The left doesn't want to jail criminals
This is true. They used hide it. They’d at least pretend. They’d say “let’s focus on the violent criminals and put them in jail.” Not really anymore.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:46 pm to TeddyPadillac
No, but their family members vote. That’s why Trudy White was running ads specifically catering to these folks just a decade or so ago.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:49 pm to DCtiger1
We need to make judges personally liable if violent criminals commit more violent crimes after receiving unusually low penalties for previous violent crimes.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:53 pm to chryso
Same question can be asked about “not snitching” in the hood. It’s US against THEM mentality.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:54 pm to DCtiger1
At this point I believe they want democrat voters to move to red states that have good economies so theu can take them over. It is the only thing that makes sense to me
Posted on 5/4/26 at 2:57 pm to DCtiger1
They’re not rogue. They get backed by liberals because they are so far left. Leftist love criminals
This post was edited on 5/4/26 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:03 pm to DCtiger1
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:04 pm to Willie Stroker
when a black woman shaves her head you know she has been elevated to a position of authority
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:05 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill issued the following statement regarding the judge's ruling: "I too am utterly confused as to why the judge would let a murder suspect with a history of fleeing justice out on bail pending trial. I will continue pushing for more judicial accountability."
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:35 pm to Archives
quote:In this particular case the judge was placed there by the electorate of the City of New Orleans which, given its track record, should not come as any surprise.
They were placed there by liberal politicians
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:52 pm to NIH
quote:
No, but their family members vote
criminals who go around killing people don't have family members who vote.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 3:59 pm to Joshjrn
And there's this part:

quote:
The court denied ankle monitoring
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:01 pm to DCtiger1
As someone that once supported the political apparatus that does this, I can explain it to you quite simply.
The goal is to defund your police, replace your DAs/Judges with leftists that are soft on crime, and "reduce racism" to focus on social justice. Sound great? Of course it does.
The actual goal? Chaos. The more the citizenry is terrorized by these demons, the more the populace will ask big brother to protect them. Except big brother does not want to protect some of you. This form of big brother wants many of you removed, eliminated, silenced.
So the next time another goon that should be in jail kills an innocent teenager in a mall, thank your local democrat voter. They want this and want more of it. Sorry the truth hurts.
The goal is to defund your police, replace your DAs/Judges with leftists that are soft on crime, and "reduce racism" to focus on social justice. Sound great? Of course it does.
The actual goal? Chaos. The more the citizenry is terrorized by these demons, the more the populace will ask big brother to protect them. Except big brother does not want to protect some of you. This form of big brother wants many of you removed, eliminated, silenced.
So the next time another goon that should be in jail kills an innocent teenager in a mall, thank your local democrat voter. They want this and want more of it. Sorry the truth hurts.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:04 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
This makes no sense. piece of shite criminals don't vote.
Their families that think they don’t do anything wrong and were arrested because of racism, sometimes do.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:04 pm to Sam Quint
quote:
1. force the system to break down
2. be the solution for broken down system
This guy gets it. Just wait until you see the progressive "solution".
JK - Many of you that live in BR are getting a small glimpse of what that looks like. Enjoy your inevitable third world status within a couple of generations.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:07 pm to TeddyPadillac
quote:
criminals who go around killing people don't have family members who vote.
If you can find their name in a "phone book", chances are good they are "voting".
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:10 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
And there's this part:
That's actually apparently a point of contention. DA is saying it was denied, Court is saying it was granted. I don't have access to the Orleans court system to see who is right and who is wrong:
quote:
The court spokesperson said Judge Nandi Campbell set Lindsey's bond at $525,000 and ordered her to ankle monitoring and 24/7 house arrest.
I will say that "house arrest" using something like ShadowTrack (phone based monitoring) instead of GPS with a fence would be abjectly fricking retarded.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:15 pm to chryso
quote:
We need to make judges personally liable if violent criminals commit more violent crimes after receiving unusually low penalties for previous violent crimes.
If that happened to one of my family members, she'd never have to worry about re-election. I'd make sure of it.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:20 pm to DCtiger1
Why an individual judge does it might be separate from why it's done as a progressive political practice. The same as a kid on a college campus really believing in the Palestinian cause.
But the reason it happens in the aggregate, and is influenced by Open Societies, Tides, etc. that fund the judges, is disruption and destabilization. "Criminal justice reform" is a way to attack the dichotomy of the criminal and the citizen, oppressors/oppressed, etc. and all the structures that "reinforce" that in their view.
"Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent" is true, but here, the mercy to the guilty part isn't really the focus. It's the cruelty to the innocent they're after. It's why Wren Collective and Open Societies keep doing this despite ample evidence of the harm coming to regular, good people. There is no question they go into it with eyes wide open - they want the fracturing, the discord, the dysfunction.
But the reason it happens in the aggregate, and is influenced by Open Societies, Tides, etc. that fund the judges, is disruption and destabilization. "Criminal justice reform" is a way to attack the dichotomy of the criminal and the citizen, oppressors/oppressed, etc. and all the structures that "reinforce" that in their view.
"Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent" is true, but here, the mercy to the guilty part isn't really the focus. It's the cruelty to the innocent they're after. It's why Wren Collective and Open Societies keep doing this despite ample evidence of the harm coming to regular, good people. There is no question they go into it with eyes wide open - they want the fracturing, the discord, the dysfunction.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 4:31 pm to biglego
There is no justification for letting an accused murderer leave the state for home confinement with no monitoring.
They don't let people who are on parole and have served their time leave the state without special permission.
They don't let people who are on parole and have served their time leave the state without special permission.
This post was edited on 5/4/26 at 4:40 pm
Popular
Back to top


1











