- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Welp... Landry actually signed some tort litigation reform bills
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:17 am to tigerinthebueche
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:17 am to tigerinthebueche
quote:
But can you offer reasons to like him? Seriously, give those of us who dislike him the reasons we should. A quick balance sheet, if you will.
Well, you weren’t getting any of these small reforms with JBE and 2 of the major business ventures (Meta) are due to Landry administration.
Is he great? No, but it’s an upgrade over JBE.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:18 am to CecildaDiesel
quote:
The no pay no play limits is awesome.
I do agree. We have a major problem with uninsured drivers.
quote:
The state needs to up the minimum insurance requirement
I agree but that's just going to, sadly, lead to more uninsured drivers (due to the cost increase)
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:18 am to Geauxldilocks
quote:
and 2 of the major business ventures (Meta) are due to Landry administration.
What?

Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:20 am to Geauxldilocks
quote:he wasn’t a candidate
you weren’t getting any of these small reforms with JBE

Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:22 am to CecildaDiesel
quote:
Sad reality is they can do all this but the insurance companies won’t lower premiums. Why would they? We pay it. Both sides are corrupt as hell but they need each other to survive.
Well... the one thing the "other side" has right about this is that Louisiana is not a competitive market for auto insurance because it is required by law.
I think it should be pure "pay to play" in that:
1) liability insurance is no longer required;
But
2) no auto liability insurance = complete bar from filing suit/recovery
And
3) your damages against a 3rd party are capped at the limits of auto liability insurance you carry (plus your UM limits if you carry it).
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:27 am to udtiger
That would be great
I like #3 especially. Has that been discussed seriously before?
I like #3 especially. Has that been discussed seriously before?
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:27 am to idsrdum
quote:While this is true, the same is true for nearly ALL doctors and hospitals.
The current tort reform bills (fault limits, no pay/no play, etc.) are good, but they’re not addressing the medical billing scam, which is a huge part of the problem. Injury lawyers send clients to certain doctors who skip insurance and bill at inflated rates through liens, then use those fake prices in court to boost settlements. It’s legal, but it’s driving up everyone’s insurance premiums — and nobody's fixing it.
As soon as they find out a patient was hurt in a wreck, they won’t take insurance. This isn’t just the docs in bed with plaintiff’s lawyers. This is the vast majority of all medical providers. It doesn’t matter if you have a lawyer, don’t have a lawyer, or plan on never getting a lawyer - most doctors and hospitals will not bill your insurance, they’ll just send you a bill (or send your lawyer a lien) for the full amount.
If you want to do away with the doctors and lawyers who work together to inflate bills, you’d have to also require all medical providers to accept medical insurance regardless of whether someone was in an accident.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:29 am to AndyJ
quote:
I like #3 especially. Has that been discussed seriously before?
I seriously doubt it.
Only way to sell it would be a percentage modifier (so as to not totally foreclose people with minimum limits). Say 5 or 10 times (so 75 to 150k for minimum limits policy [or double that with equal UM])
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:51 am to idsrdum
quote:
The current tort reform bills (fault limits, no pay/no play, etc.) are good, but they’re not addressing the medical billing scam, which is a huge part of the problem. Injury lawyers send clients to certain doctors who skip insurance and bill at inflated rates through liens, then use those fake prices in court to boost settlements. It’s legal, but it’s driving up everyone’s insurance premiums — and nobody's fixing it.
Morris Bart hosts an annual Christmas party every year at a restaurant in the quarter for all of the doctors he uses in his cases. I cannot for the life of me understand how something like this is allowed.
People cannot hate scumbag lawyers enough
Posted on 5/29/25 at 7:57 am to TigerFanNSTC
quote:
When should we expect relief on insurance rates?
Insurance companies will never reduce rates. They will keep ringing the tort reform bell until people are forced to take their offers and then they will blame rate increases on something else (bad roads, bad drivers, inflation, climate change…etc)
Posted on 5/29/25 at 8:01 am to The Cow Goes Moo Moo
quote:
Morris Bart hosts an annual Christmas party every year at a restaurant in the quarter for all of the doctors he uses in his cases. I cannot for the life of me understand how something like this is allowed
I feel like y’all are probably paying like 100 more bucks a year because of this which doesn’t hurt you any but it gives those doctors and lawyers a chance at a better life so it increases the level of happiness in the world
Posted on 5/29/25 at 8:08 am to idsrdum
quote:
The current tort reform bills (fault limits, no pay/no play, etc.) are good, but they’re not addressing the medical billing scam, which is a huge part of the problem. Injury lawyers send clients to certain doctors who skip insurance and bill at inflated rates through liens, then use those fake prices in court to boost settlements. It’s legal, but it’s driving up everyone’s insurance premiums — and nobody's fixing it.
This. I was at fault in an accident and this exactly how they got the max from the insurance company for every person in the car.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 8:10 am to 385 Tiger
quote:
I voted for Landry, but he is not the Republican I wanted. I am more disappointed than I could have imagined. He is a caricature of a conservative southern governor, beholden to himself first and secondarily to the plaintiffs attorneys who funded his campaign, and I have seen nothing to indicate that he is interested in discussing serious solutions to our state's serious problems.
This.
Although I didn't vote because I'm out of state now. I would've voted for him in the general. But he has been a massive disappointment for the state.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 8:12 am to el Gaucho
quote:
but it gives those doctors and lawyers a chance at a better life so it increases the level of happiness in the world

Posted on 5/29/25 at 8:12 am to 385 Tiger
This was all clear as day during his campaign and even during his time as AG. Dude IS the swamp that he wants to drain so bad.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 8:17 am to CecildaDiesel
quote:
The no pay no play limits is awesome.
Not really. They slipped in the $100,000 exemption. That is a very easy hurdle to clear. I really doubt Gordon is taking on a lot of $50,000 claims.
quote:
Uninsured drivers are barred from collecting unless damages exceed $100,000 (bodily injury or property).
Posted on 5/29/25 at 8:23 am to Shaun176
quote:
This could be huge if the insurance companies tell the billboard lawyers to pound sand.
Come on over to Alabama where we have Contributory Negligence. Its the law but not fully applied in settlements.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 8:24 am to Fishwater
quote:the only place in the world that has more lawyer billboards than Louisiana
Come on over to Alabama
Posted on 5/29/25 at 8:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The no pay no play limits is awesome. I do agree. We have a major problem with uninsured drivers.
This does nothing to encourage “culcha” to start carrying insurance. It just ensures they won’t get rich by scamming us later.
Posted on 5/29/25 at 8:24 am to idsrdum
quote:
Expanded No Pay/No Play:
Uninsured drivers are barred from collecting unless damages exceed $100,000 (bodily injury or property). This pushes more people to carry insurance and improves the overall risk pool.
Knowing human behavior, I can't see how this doesn't just set the new floor at $100,001. I'm not a lawyer nor in the insurance business so I have no idea what hurdles are needed to even have reasonable grounds for that high of a claim by an uninsured motorist (outside of bodily injury, but I would think many of those claims would be sub-$100k).
quote:
End of Housley Presumption:
No more automatic assumption that a medical condition shortly after an accident was caused by it. Makes injury claims harder to prove — reduces inflated payouts.
Dr. Plantz already cashed out.
Popular
Back to top
