- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Vote to change TOPS to need based or ACT at least 30 FAILS
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:34 pm
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:34 pm
"Up in House Ed: Bill to revamp how TOPS spent if underfunded. Those with ACT 30 and over gets 100 percent; under $60,000 same.#lalege
TOPS revamp bill fails 6-7.#lalege
LINK
TOPS revamp bill fails 6-7.#lalege
LINK
This post was edited on 5/10/17 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:34 pm to tigerskin
"Future TOPS students would have to earn 2.75 GPA, not 2.5, under bill approved by House Ed. Vote was 9-3. To full House.HB 117.#lalege
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:36 pm to tigerskin
Current qualification for TOPS is ridiculous. If you don't have the current qualifications, you shouldn't even be on a college campus.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:36 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Those with ACT 30 and over
<---
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:37 pm to tigerskin
quote:
"Up in House Ed: Bill to revamp how TOPS spent if underfunded. Those with ACT 30 and over gets 100 percent; under $60,000 same.#lalege
TOPS revamp bill fails 6-7.#lalege
Don't worry, we'll just shake the fricking money tree more to continue to fund this fricktardery.
Who are the sellouts that voted against it?
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:37 pm to tigerskin
People with 30 on the ACT are likely getting a full ride (or close) somewhere without needing 100% of TOPS.
Couple that with the fact that TOPS basically grants the poor inner city kids the chance to go to college for free, and few legislators are gonna vote for that.
Couple that with the fact that TOPS basically grants the poor inner city kids the chance to go to college for free, and few legislators are gonna vote for that.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:38 pm to The Pirate King
People who get a 30 ACT ain't going to LSU
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:38 pm to The Pirate King
should be at least a 30
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:39 pm to tigerskin
30 on the ACT and you won't need TOPS
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:40 pm to tigerskin
So they were trying to make the TOPS scholarship resemble an actual scholarship?
This post was edited on 5/10/17 at 3:49 pm
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:40 pm to Lithium
Here was the sticking point
"Students who do not qualify for TOPS exception would see radical drop in aid. At LSU, from about $5,000 past semester to about $500.#lalege
"Students who do not qualify for TOPS exception would see radical drop in aid. At LSU, from about $5,000 past semester to about $500.#lalege
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:41 pm to tigerskin
I made a 24. I guess I is dumb
Had a hangover doe
Had a hangover doe
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:41 pm to The Pirate King
There are other needs based scholarships. TOPS should be 100% merit based imo
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:42 pm to tigerskin
They could have at least increased the GPA requirement to 3.0. Bumping the ACT to 30 is ridiculous though.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:43 pm to Nation of Buga
It sounds like they went for 3.0 but settled at 2.75
This post was edited on 5/10/17 at 3:44 pm
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:45 pm to tigerskin
Might as well get rid of TOPS if you make those changes. Poor people and people with 30+ ACT scores already get free tuition most of the time.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 3:46 pm to tigerskin
quote:RIP Tigahrag
ACT at least 30
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News