Started By
Message

re: Vote to change TOPS to need based or ACT at least 30 FAILS

Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:08 pm to
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36806 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:08 pm to
quote:

Sure you were. If only you didn't get drunk both nights before, you'd have scored a 32.



You got me. I'll take my accounting degree and MBA and throw them in the trash
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
78024 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

Because no where does it say you have to pay it back if you don't maintain your grades.
Scruffy said it should be that way, not "that is the way it is".

Sheesh.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41667 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:09 pm to
I got at 31, but 30 is too high. If you go to 30, just shut down TOPS entirely.
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
11631 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

Jimmy2shoes


Agree with most of your points, but think a tiered system would work.

30+ 100%
28-29 80%
26-27 75%
24-25 50%
22-23 25%

I also like the idea of a maintained GPA that could lower or increase the tier for a student while they are in school. TOPS is a reward, not a right. It's meant to reward top kids and keep them in-state.

I also would not be opposed to a payback plan if one loses their TOPS after their first semester at a graduated rate.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89388 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

Oh, well, no repercussions for poor decision making.


Losing TOPS is "no repercussion?"

quote:

Did you get a lollipop with your participation degree?



Looks like you might have gotten your MD out of a Cracker Jack box.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
78024 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

You want to change the contract.
For future enrollees, yes, Scruffy does.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89388 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Scruffy said it should be that way, not "that is the way it is".

Sheesh.




Scruffy is making asinine arguments.
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Oh, well, no repercussions for poor decision making.

The hell are you talking about? He loses future payment for school.

quote:

You must be a supporter of the participation trophy. 



You been hanging out on the poli board or something? Your usually not this dumb.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89388 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

You got me. I'll take my accounting degree and MBA and throw them in the trash


Not sure what your degrees have to do with anything, but cool story none the less.
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36806 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Scruffy is making asinine arguments.



quote:

LNCHBOX




The irony
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
78024 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Losing TOPS is "no repercussion?"
Not harsh enough.
quote:

Looks like you might have gotten your MD out of a Cracker Jack box.
Wheaties box. Cracker Jack boxes have chiropractor degrees.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89388 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

The irony


What asinine statement am I making? I'd love to see it.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89388 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

Not harsh enough.


Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36806 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:12 pm to
I don't agree with the pay it back because the first year was earned. Everything after that is conditional. Kind of like the probationary periods at some jobs
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36806 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:12 pm to
quote:



What asinine statement am I making? I'd love to see it.





Read your post history
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89388 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

Read your post history


Sweet cop out bro.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
26153 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:13 pm to
If they are going to make TOPS need based, they should kill it. That isn't what the program was designed to do, and I think many people would feel the same way about a new purpose.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89388 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

If they are going to make TOPS need based, they should kill it. That isn't what the program was designed to do,


Yep.
Posted by redbullwings
Member since Aug 2013
874 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:14 pm to
TOPS should be paid back if the students fails out or drops out of school. So much money is wasted on students who fail out or dropout. People need to be held accountable for the tuition assistance they get. Make good grades and pass your classes, great and thanks for staying home for college. Flunk or drop out after a few semesters, pay back the tuition assistance you accepted.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
26153 posts
Posted on 5/10/17 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

I also would not be opposed to a payback plan if one loses their TOPS after their first semester at a graduated rate.


That sounds great, but isn't really a problem with the program if you review their annual reports. The fact is there just aren't that many people who get TOPS who are wasting money by losing TOPS or not finishing.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram