re: Video of 7yo "transgender" admitting his mom dresses him in dresses, paints his nails

quote:

---

1. A mom with a political motivation forcing gender decisions, and POSSIBLY chemical castration (even entertaining the idea), etc. on a child. Confusing their view of the world

---

Everything I've read that cast the mother in a negative light is coming from the father. The jury, the medical experts on the case...sides with the mom. I'm not defending her actions necessarily and if my son was being coerced into being a girl by his mom with a political agenda and was on the brink of hormone therapy..I would probably choose extreme measures to stop it. but I'm not convinced that is the case here.

quote:

---

The doctors said that the boy is gender fluid

---

At 7

Seven

SEVEN frickING YEARS OLD

eta: Let's not forget this has been happening since he was 3. Three. That's one, two, three years. How the hell does a three year old get confused if they're a boy or girl. Here's a fricking pro tip: THEY DON'T.

Oh he's "gender fluid". More weasily made up bullshite to suit an agenda. Again, it's naive to think these doctors would outright say "yeah, the mother is nuts and the kid is a boy, period". They're going to use this spineless response to avoid controversy to be slandered online by butthurt mentally ill people.


Do you have kids? I do, a 10 and 5 year old. I'm sure if I kept telling my daughter she's a boy and dressed her up as one she's eventually going to comply to make me happy as kids normally do for parents.

This is grooming, period.

Liberalism is a disease and a cult.

quote:

---

The doctors said that the boy is gender fluid

---

He is gender fluid because the mother has been pushing this on him since he was three years old.

It isn't a problem if this kid grows up and arrives on this conclusion on their own but that doesn't seem to the be case here with this mother's influence.

quote:

---

They want to show the world how woke and supportive they are to these nutjob causes no matter how absurd they get. They want to virtue signal on social media how they're an "ally" for points or some shite.

Deep down inside they know its bullshite but their life is so empty and without purpose this is all they got. Same goes for this so called mother. It's not about the child, it's about her own selfish needs and wants.

---

I'm convinced most of these parents grooming their children to be trans are only doing it to virtue signal how woke they are.

quote:

---

ThuperThumpin

---

Also, your response is coming from the Reddit thread.

Someone on the PT Board:

quote:

---

You're an imbecile if you actually believe that Leftwing LARP'ing bullshite story from Reddit was an actual juror.

That shite story was full of holes and omissions and drowning in animus bias.

The father is not a deadbeat or con-artist, and had a six-figure job as an architect before getting married. The wife wanted to continue her pediatricians practice and asked him to quit his job and become a stay at home dad to raise the kids.

When they separated, he moved to an apartment 2 miles from the kids and got a job with MetLife Home Loans as an Architect, where he still works to this day.

---

I mean, neither is credible, just saying.

I would argue from the the idea that the only way the father should be ignored is if he were actually abusive. If there's no evidence of that anywhere, what the mother is doing id child abuse. And child abuse isn't ok just because the other guy might be a scam artist or might be a little crazy.

If what the father says is true, this is pretty clear.
If what the reddit person says is true, it's still problematic to say that child abuse is ok just because the dad is a dead beat too.
If what the PT person says is true, again, that is super clear.

I have yet to see an instance where it makes sense to leave the kid with the mom, that's the problem.

quote:

---

At 7 Seven SEVEN frickING YEARS OLD Oh he's "gender fluid". More weasily made up bullshite to suit an agenda. Again, it's naive to think these doctors would outright say "yeah, the mother is nuts and the kid is a boy, period". They're going to use this spineless response to avoid controversy to be slandered online by butthurt mentally ill people. Do you have kids? I do, a 10 and 5 year old. I'm sure if I kept telling my daughter she's a boy and dressed her up as one she's eventually going to comply to make me happy as kids normally do for parents. This is grooming, period.

---

I do have kids. I agree you can groom a child to comply and frankly I would not even bring up gender issues or sexual orientation with my kids at that young an age even if I suspected they were LGBTQ. The father says he acts like a boy in his presence. Could it be he knows his dad disapproves of him behaving like a girl. IDK possibly.Read the court documents LINK He appaers to be a very disturbed individual himself and abused the other children so the story coming from him and his supporters is dubious at best. Unfortunately the case maybe that both parents are not doing whats in the best interest of the child and hopefully further investigations will help to guide a positive outcome.

quote:

---

Also, your response is coming from the Reddit thread.

---

No its not.

quote:

---

I would argue from the the idea that the only way the father should be ignored is if he were actually abusive. If there's no evidence of that anywhere,

---

Link to the court findings LINK
Children
39) Respondent engaged in inappropriate and hurtful treatment of the Girls.
40) The Girls were good, sweet, hardworking well-mannered children.
41) Respondent forced the Girls to do plank push up for extended periods of time while
reaing the "house rules" until the Girls cried.
42) Respondent would lock down the Girls* room and remove all their possession from
their rooms and would not let them participate in family activities.
43) Respondent would put the Girls in "silent treatment" and they could not talk unless
spoken to for many, many days.
44) Respondent's actions caused barm to the Girls.
45) One of the Girls developed a suicide plan
46) The other Girl was cutting herself.
findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law Page 3 of 11
ITIOJA.D.YaNDJUJ>.Y
47) Based in large part on his treatment of the Girls, Petitioner asked Respondent tamove
out of the Petitioner's residence.
48) Both Girls improved after Respondent moved out of Petitioner's residence.
49) Respondent lied to the Petitioner about the Girls.
50) The Girls have a very good, safe and healthy relationship with the Boys.
51) Respondent failed to co-parent with the Petitioner.
52) Petitioner made repeated attempts to co-parent with Respondent.
53) Respondent failed to keep any agreements made with Petitioner during Parenting
Facilitation sessions.
54) Respondent treated the Petitioner and the Girls in a disparaging, derogatory, abusive
and insulting manner.
55) Respondent is pejorative.
56) Petitioner works flexible hours and part-time on some days of the week.
57) Petitioner was the primary parent of the Qiildren even before the parties separated.
58) Respondent regularly failed to take possession time with the Boys granted to him in
Temporary Orders in this matter.
59) Respondent regularly failed to take the Boys to school during his periods of possession.
60) Respondent regularly failed to allow the Petitioner electronic communication with the
Boys.
61) Respondent lacked insight into how behaviors by him may be repeated with the Boys.
62) Respondent had 3 mattresses in one room on the floor for his bed and the Boy's beds.
63) Respondent admitted he had not slept in a bed for the 12 years before marrying
Petitioner.
64) Respondent admitted he could not recall the addresses of where he lived or who he
lived with for the 10 years before meeting Petitioner.
65) Respondent failed to attend counseling as ordered by the Court.
66) The Respondent will say or do anything to get his way.
Findings of facts and Conclusions of Law Page 4 of 11

I find this fascinating for a variety of reasons:

109) The Respondent was discharged from the Army for "Admission of Homosexuality."
110) The Respondent denies being a homosexual at the time of discharge from the Army.
111) The Respondent lied to the Army about being a homosexual.

I don't get how the sex change drugs and stuff don't have an age of consent?

Shouldn't they say it's 18 just so they're positive all people prescribed these meds are post-pubescent and are adults mentally?

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills.