Started By
Message

re: United CEO doubles down, calls passenger "belligerent", claims United followed rules

Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:11 pm to
Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
98953 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:11 pm to
They operate on a pretty tight timeline with stuff like that. It would be possible to swap but the chances of having a crew that's ready to fly at 7am just hanging out til noon is pretty unlikely. Especially at a small airport like Louisville
Posted by kfaulk03
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2007
1494 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

Because people's IQ drop about 50 points right when they arrive at the airport.


U have to. How else would you survive that cesspool, cattle drive of a clusterfck
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:13 pm to
That would be too much effort. They would rather rely on random chance of pissing off customers who would be bumped from a flight they have oversold.
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18912 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:13 pm to
Internal medicine
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
69091 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Just bought 1,000 shares


Axe Capital just took a short position on UAL
Posted by Junky
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2005
9230 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:27 pm to
quote:


No, but sometimes they'll assign your seat at the gate. So why'd they assign him a seat? Surely they knew they needed the seats before everyone on the plane checked-in. They sure as hell should have known before boarding.


Because it is their airplane and can do what they want. Don't get all outraged when the guy tried sneaking back on and got what was coming to him
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24213 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Because it is their airplane and can do what they want. Don't get all outraged when the guy tried sneaking back on and got what was coming to him


The reddit story is he supposedly tried to sneak back on after they pried him off which knocked him out and bloodied his nose. Not that he snuck on the plane initially.

No one says the dude is great guy, the universal opinion is that he should of left after they requested him to. That still by no means justifies United's actions.
Posted by Junky
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2005
9230 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

That still by no means justifies United's actions.


Did United rough him up? No. They were following procedures and then he became unruly. We know what happens when you become an unruly passenger.
Posted by Dont_Call_Me_RAY
Member since Feb 2017
1439 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:39 pm to
1. All the passengers were already boarded, THEN 4 united employees wanted on. Simple answer is, "sorry, too late". That is what airlines would tell a paying passenger.

2. I doubt UA staff informed the police the whole story, just that "a passenger is refusing to get off the aircraft". This would imply the removal demand was purely due to passenger behavior. So the police were in aggressive mode from the get go.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33142 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

All the passengers were already boarded, THEN 4 united employees wanted on. Simple answer is, "sorry, too late". That is what airlines would tell a paying passenger.



I don't even mind them booting people.....but offer a reasonable voucher as compensation and keep upping it until you get volunteers.

A volunteer is happy to have the voucher. An elderly man ending up with a bloodied nose and a concussion is a lawsuit and PR disaster and a downright shitty thing to do. Clearly a product of shitty corporate culture.

quote:

I doubt UA staff informed the police the whole story, just that "a passenger is refusing to get off the aircraft". This would imply the removal demand was purely due to passenger behavior. So the police were in aggressive mode from the get go.


You are likely 100% correct on that. Cops probably think he was a threat or something. The passengers didn't, thus their very different reaction to the situation than the cops.
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 12:44 pm
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24213 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Did United rough him up? No. They were following procedures and then he became unruly. We know what happens when you become an unruly passenger.


Why was it specifically him? If there were 70+ passengers, why was he chosen? Because he paid the lowest, ok that's fine but what if that was the fare of the day and he had somewhere important to go?

What if this was his daughters wedding, a family member dying, etc? The guy being a jackwagon in no way whatsoever justifies United's policy of kicking a paying customer off of a flight for non-paying crew members.

What if they just allowed anyone to come up and offer $1000 extra for any flight? Would you be happy they kicked you off a flight because someone else paid more for their ticket? You pay what United is charging, not more.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

They were following procedures and then he became unruly


Is peacefully sitting in a seat "unruly"?

Perhaps you and I have different definitions. If this dude was causing a scene and being violent/belligerent than you would have a point. I have seen nothing to indicate this happened. Have you?
Posted by musick
the internet
Member since Dec 2008
26131 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:45 pm to
he is a pulmonologist and is claiming he had important appointments to make concerning the health of his patients.
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 12:45 pm
Posted by Junky
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2005
9230 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

doubt UA staff informed the police the whole story, just that "a passenger is refusing to get off the aircraft". This would imply the removal demand was purely due to passenger behavior. So the police were in aggressive mode from the get go.


He would have been removed regardless of the story united told - united wanted him off - he is off
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
24213 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:46 pm to
I would be very curious to see what the security and police reaction is to this? I think its pretty ridiculous to even allow them to be involved here, in my opinion this is a strictly civil matter that should of been solved financially but United was too stubborn for that. I'd have no issues with the police not getting involved in non-criminal issues on the airlines.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Axe Capital just took a short position on UAL


That Colorado oceanfront property offer to UAL stockholders still stands.
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 12:47 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476983 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:46 pm to
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33142 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

United didn't drag him out of his seat. The chicago police did


I understand what you are saying, but it doesn't really matter. It's still an indictment on United's business practices.

United (or most likely a United Express carrier) created the situation and didn't offer enough in vouchers or credits to get volunteers. They needed space for their own employees, didn't want to cough up a reasonable credit, and a paid passenger ended up injured and bloodied to make space.

That's fricked up.

This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 12:49 pm
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33142 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

What if they just allowed anyone to come up and offer $1000 extra for any flight? Would you be happy they kicked you off a flight because someone else paid more for their ticket? You pay what United is charging, not more.



Why not offer more for the voucher and get volunteers?

That way everyone is happy. Even the person leaving the plane feels like they got a good deal.
This post was edited on 4/11/17 at 12:48 pm
Posted by Junky
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2005
9230 posts
Posted on 4/11/17 at 12:48 pm to
He was randomly chosen and then United stuck with their choice because again, it is their plane and their right to. You forget that United would rebook him and accommodate their mistake. His choice was to act like a spoiled child.
Jump to page
Page First 11 12 13 14 15 ... 61
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 13 of 61Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram