Started By
Message

re: Trial lawyers are lobbying against self driving vehicles because they’re too safe

Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:51 pm to
Posted by tigerfan 64
in the LP
Member since Sep 2016
6676 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:51 pm to
quote:

LSU better tap that Waymo NIL when the PI well runs dry.

Waymo can get in on NIL by sponsoring cars for nil athletes.
No more dwi's, drag racing deaths or chargers.
Shut em off at midnight
Posted by Grievous Angel
Tuscaloosa, AL
Member since Dec 2008
10961 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 9:02 pm to
I rode in one back from Atlanta. Automated stop at Tesla supercharger included.

I wouldn't say I didn't have anxiety over FSD...but it cooled off as the night wore on.

I did NOT trust it as much as my driver did. But I was impressed.

Posted by Tall Tiger
Golden Rectangle
Member since Sep 2007
4305 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 9:06 pm to
The wristwatch threads in the OT are going to take a serious beating when you don't have the PI plaintiff lawyers with all those Patek Phillipes to post.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
16857 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

How are they safer? And how can you say that when most people don’t own self driving cars?

The answer to your question is in the OP. Read it again.

Data analysis does not require an equal population of 2 groups in order to calculate rates of occurrence.
quote:

Hasn’t there been videos in SF of those ways cars or whatever they’re called going haywire? Didn’t uber have a driverless car kill someone a few years ago also? Seems like the they're still working out the bugs with this technology.

The Waymo vehicles were experiencing safe glitches. No one was injured.

An Uber self driving vehicle did result in a fatality with a human driver behind the wheel … almost 9 years ago. Uber abandoned attempts to produce their own autonomous vehicle because their technology sucked.
This post was edited on 7/19/26 at 9:34 pm
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85252 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:12 am to
quote:

You think like an Indian woman driving on I-10, if they're going slower, they're not going to get hurt. Oh, but the people behind you slamming on their brakes and causing accidents because you're merging onto the interstate at 30mph are for sure fricking getting hurt.

Drives me nuts and it’s so prevalent in Houston. Too many Asians and Indians and people staring at phones.
Posted by tadman
Member since Jun 2020
5535 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 8:35 am to
quote:

100% chance of insurance going down.

With automated cars, charging liability will be a technicality.
There will be no negligence or intentional tort.
There will be virtually no nuclear verdicts.


Everything you've said makes sense until we consider the insurance companies. They aren't exactly friendly neighbors, more like parasitic guests.
Posted by spslayto
Member since Feb 2004
22003 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Also, it will get to the point where it will be far more expensive to insure a manually driving car than a self driving one.


Is it cheaper now if you have a self-driving car?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram