- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 12/21/15 at 5:38 pm to biglego
Understood.
You had to know though, that his position here is right in line with his party's platform. This should not be a shock to anyone.
He managed to keep the campaign focused on Vitter's issue from 2007 and not his classic Democratic voting record.
He ran an excellent campaign.
You had to know though, that his position here is right in line with his party's platform. This should not be a shock to anyone.
He managed to keep the campaign focused on Vitter's issue from 2007 and not his classic Democratic voting record.
He ran an excellent campaign.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 5:47 pm to ClientNumber9
quote:
Yes, but thanks to your mindset, people are never faced with that decision. They don't have to chose whether to work or eat. They choose not to work and the government gives them food, shelter, reduced housing, medical care and pretty much anything else they need to survive.
And for some they go ahead and rob others for the "extras" in life.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 5:53 pm to Crusty
It seems that South Park was correct in what choice you had for governor....Giant Douche or Turd Sandwich. Not sure which one y'all got though.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 5:56 pm to Crusty
quote:
Thoughts on Edwards removing the work requirements for food stamps?
It's a travesty the Republican party couldn't put up a more viable candidate than Vitter.
Now we have this dimwit that wants to give away the house and promote it's okay to not have to work to put food on the table.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 6:14 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
so wait there are adults out there without children that don't work to feed themselves...and the governor wants to continue this? what the frick is wrong with democrats?
This! I don't understand what's the gain from doing this? Can a Democrat explain this to me how this would help anything?
The people who originally voted for Vitter has this on their hands. This is the reason why Dems can laugh at Republicans. Angelle or Dar-dar would've been huge upgrades.
This post was edited on 12/21/15 at 6:16 pm
Posted on 12/21/15 at 6:15 pm to Crusty
Yeah, but he went to West Point so it's all good.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 6:22 pm to Flame Salamander
quote:
What do you think about my earlier suggestion that we execute everyone below a certain IQ level...that will solve a lot of the problem of people not being able to find lifelong jobs with which they can support themselves. That will teach those lazy fricks!
Because clearly rounding up "stupid" people and executing them is the same thing as not giving them food stamps when they are able bodied, have no dependents, and refuse to work.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 6:28 pm to Flame Salamander
quote:
The transition team said about $72 million in benefits flows to the state annually under SNAP. "The entire $72 million is federally funded and will not require any additional state funds to continue," the team's statement said.
This quote explains it, but people don't bother to read all the facts of an issue....they just slobber like dogs when they hear about "welfare recipients".
States like Louisiana, Alabama and Mississippi get far more back from the federal government than they send up there.
Yes, there are a lot of worthless people playing the system and getting Food Stamps. But when push comes to shove the whole program is a CORPORATE subsidy.
Alabama has recently ended their ABAWD waiver, fwiw, and now people in that category can only get three months of benefits without meeting the 20 hour per week requirement, and a total of six months in a 36 month period.
The disabled are not considered to be "able bodied"
Homeless are exempt from ABAWD provisions. A person can also claim to perform work for "in kind" rent.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 6:39 pm to Crusty
quote:
What do y'all think about Governor Edwards removing the work requirement for food stamps for those able to work?
Elections have consequences. The voters get what they vote for.
Elections are a vote for good policy, not feeling good about a candidate and shite like this is just a good reminder of that.
Vitter would only be fricking hookers, JBE will screw Louisiana.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 6:55 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
It was predictable. All the anti-whore banging Republicans are getting what they deserve.
He's a good, Christian, West Point grad that's gonna tax and spend like a mofo for at least the next 4 years.
And the thing is, the so called republican statehouse is actually very powerless to stop him. The Governor regardless of party, controls the legislature like they're on a leash with the line item veto. There's other things that I could mention to reaffirm just how powerful the Governor of Louisiana is to give people a lesson why they need to be much more careful voting for Governor and vote on policy and not feelings.
When those republicans start moaning and whining about it, I'm gonna tell them to shut the frick up and sit the frick down. They voted for that shite instead of a candidate that would not govern like a liberal and actually had conservative bona fides.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 7:02 pm to SG_Geaux
More garbage!! Food stamps and welfare were meant to be a temporary help. Liberals are enslaving America's poor into a form of socialism replying on the government- Especially the students. They think our country can afford to put everybody on food stamps.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 7:11 pm to Crusty
Paying for votes after the fact is okay.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 7:21 pm to Flame Salamander
quote:
What do you think about my earlier suggestion that we execute everyone below a certain IQ level...that will solve a lot of the problem of people not being able to find lifelong jobs with which they can support themselves. That will teach those lazy fricks!
Horrible reasoning. (or were you joking?)
I know a dude that actually graduated from HS and was unable to read or write. This was before all the LEAP testing, passed because he was a nice guy. Very low IQ. But hardest working guy I know. He grosses over $425K/year and owns his own business. His wife keeps the books. He works 7 days a week when business is busy, and keeps care of the house and property.
Why do you think people with low IQ computes to lazy?
Posted on 12/21/15 at 7:28 pm to Festus
Be honest. How many of you actually read the article? 
Posted on 12/21/15 at 7:47 pm to MightyYat
quote:
Be honest. How many of you actually read the article?
I have not and never will.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 7:52 pm to MightyYat
quote:
Be honest. How many of you actually read the article?
I don't get it? Posted on 12/21/15 at 7:52 pm to Tiger79
quote:
enslaving
Sorry.
Slaveowners actually expected work/labor from their charges.
All Dems expect are votes.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 7:57 pm to Festus
quote:
I don't get it?
He asked for an extension not to remove it.
Posted on 12/21/15 at 7:58 pm to Crusty
He is a liberal shithead. Why is this surprising?
What kind of fricked up a-hole sues to let able bodied people continue to get free shite? I know that's not him but some other lib kook group.
Libs are so fricking generous with other peoples' money.
What kind of fricked up a-hole sues to let able bodied people continue to get free shite? I know that's not him but some other lib kook group.
Libs are so fricking generous with other peoples' money.
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News