Started By
Message

re: Thoughts on Edwards removing the work requirements for food stamps?

Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:14 pm to
Posted by BoostAddict
Member since Jun 2007
2986 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:14 pm to
Of course he is.
Posted by MightyYat
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2009
24390 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:14 pm to
quote:

exactly. if an able bodied adult can't find the means to keep themselves fed why should we care? let them starve...this excludes the truly disabled people.


If Edwards would say that's the reason I'd get it. This "lack of job training" shite is nonsense.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67589 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

This "lack of job training" shite is nonsense.


Yep. Start off with a min wage job and work your way out...you are still getting the food stamps but you are working towards not needing them.
Posted by Count Chocula
Tier 5 and proud
Member since Feb 2009
63908 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:17 pm to
Didn't take long for Edwards to start acting like the Democrat he is.

Stupid people need to remember that elections have consequences.
Posted by Flame Salamander
Texas Gulf - Clear Lake
Member since Jan 2012
3044 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

Yep. Start off with a min wage job and work your way out...you are still getting the food stamps but you are working towards not needing them


What if you get sick and lose your job?

What if your boss orders you to commit an unethical/illegal act and you refuse...so he fires you?
This post was edited on 12/21/15 at 4:18 pm
Posted by lsuhunt555
Teakwood Village Breh
Member since Nov 2008
38409 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:18 pm to
He's a democrat, wouldnt expect anything less. Has to keep his constituents happy.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67589 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

What if you get sick and lose your job?


what if I get sick and lose my job? I go get another job.
Posted by Flame Salamander
Texas Gulf - Clear Lake
Member since Jan 2012
3044 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

What if you get sick and lose your job?


what if I get sick and lose my job? I go get another job.


Life is not that simple and it is not always that easy for everyone.

How about we just execute all people who score below a certain level on IQ tests...lets do it in, say, 5th grade. That will take care of a lot of this problem!!!
Posted by MightyYat
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2009
24390 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

He's a democrat, wouldnt expect anything less. Has to keep his constituents happy.


I know people are always ready to jump on political parties and all buy why did this take Jindal 8 years to implement?
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28345 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Well, if this is correct, it didn't take long for him to become a fricktard


What do you mean "didn't take him long"? Outside of MAYBE abortion (which is a federal issue for the most part anyway), he is in lockstep with the Democrat's platform. His ENTIRE campaign centered around David Vitter having sex with hookers. In a deep-red state he touted virtually NOTHING about his agenda if elected Gov. Yet, moron "Republicans" couldn't see through the thinly-veiled charade. Now you're surprised you're getting exactly what you voted for? JBE didn't "trick" the general populace of Louisiana. The general populace was too stupid to look past David Vitter being a shitty person. You weren't voting for your next brother-in-law, jackasses. You were voting for the Governor. I'll say this though. At least JBE is very honorable while he sticks it the minority of "producers" in this state.

Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67589 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Life is not that simple and it is not always that easy for everyone.


but it really is. Life isn't supposed to be easy...if you choose to be lazy and depend on others you deserve to starve to death. We are only talking about the people who are perfectly able to work and provide for themselves but choose to live off taxpayers...with the proper motivation (going hungry) they will find a way to work.
Posted by biohzrd
Central City
Member since Jan 2010
5602 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:23 pm to
We have a vet with one leg doing fire watch work making almost 20.00 an hour to sit on a bucket with an air horn,sniffer, and log. This is total bullshite.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67589 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

We have a vet with one leg doing fire watch work making almost 20.00 an hour to sit on a bucket with an air horn,sniffer, and log. This is total bullshite.


he has a perfectly good reason to live off the taxpayers and not work...but he has pride
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
202891 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

for adults ages 18 to 49 without children


Anybody that's that age and has no children should not even be able for food stamps in the 1st place.......
Posted by Count Chocula
Tier 5 and proud
Member since Feb 2009
63908 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Anybody that's that age and has no children should not even be able for food stamps in the 1st place.......
Then there are those under 30 with 8 kids and no baby daddy.
Posted by jdd48
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2012
22086 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:33 pm to
This is just the very beginning of what is to come. I wouldn't be shocked if he ends up being a 1 term governor.
Posted by 8thyearsenior
Centennial, CO
Member since Mar 2006
4280 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

prostitute! fricking retard voters


I don't live in LA so don't know much about either one but I always want a person in a position of power not to be doing stupid shite that they can be blackmailed for like fricking prostitutes while married.
Posted by theOG
Member since Feb 2010
10506 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Did you know he went to West Point?


and he's a hunter!

in fairness to him, he's giving the people that voted for him exactly what they want.
This post was edited on 12/21/15 at 4:37 pm
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161244 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:37 pm to
I have anxiety issues, I can't leave the house so therefore I don't work. Please keep paying for my online addiction as well.
Posted by Flame Salamander
Texas Gulf - Clear Lake
Member since Jan 2012
3044 posts
Posted on 12/21/15 at 4:40 pm to
This won't cost Louisianans a thing.

Louisiana's unemployment rate has gone up with the price of oil crash...all those low-medium IQ roustabouts will now be taking the Wendy's jobs from the low IQ Food Stamp people.


Times Picayune

Gov.-elect John Bel Edwards said Monday (Dec. 21) that he's asking the federal government and the Louisiana Department of Children and Family Services not to interrupt food stamp benefits to about 31,000 residents. As of Jan. 1, those residents faced the possibility of losing the assistance because Gov. Bobby Jindal's administration decided not to apply for a waiver that would have allowed the federal benefit to continue in Louisiana.

With a waiver, states that have higher-than-average unemployment rates may continue to receive benefits under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. Louisiana has the fifth-highest unemployment rate in the United States; it rose from 6.2 percent to 6.3 percent in November, according to The Associated Press.

The benefits cutoff affects low-income, able-bodied adults without children and younger than 49 if they work fewer than 20 hours a week. Most beneficiaries receive $194 per month in food stamps. Edwards, who becomes governor at noon on Jan. 11, said he will direct the Children and Family Services Department and the Legislature to develop workforce training programs for SNAP recipients who are unable to find work.

It remains unclear how Edwards' directive will be implemented, considering he is not yet governor. Edwards' transition team said in a statement that the governor-elect sent letters telling the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers SNAP, and the state department he will request the waiver that Jindal's administration decided not to obtain.

People who will be affected by the benefits cutoff would typically receive their assistance Jan. 6. A pending lawsuit against the state seeks to block the benefits cutoff. Attorneys on that case did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

"Gov.-elect Edwards' transition team staff is working with DCFS staff to try to avoid any interruption of benefits and to determine whether, upon a Jan. 11, 2016, official request, the federal government could possibly make the distribution of ... benefits under the waiver retroactive to Oct. 1, 2015," the transition team said in a statement.

The transition team said about $72 million in benefits flows to the state annually under SNAP. "The entire $72 million is federally funded and will not require any additional state funds to continue," the team's statement said.

The state first estimated that more than 62,000 people would be affected by the benefits cutoff. That number has been whittled to 31,000 since beneficiaries were first notified of plan changes in October.

"The best way to break the cycle of poverty is for individuals to get a job and get off of government assistance," the Jindal administration said in a statement. "Having a job is empowering. This decision will mean more able-bodied Louisianians will be dependent on the government and discouraged from joining the workforce."
This post was edited on 12/21/15 at 4:49 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram