- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
The World Cup hands US economy $20B boost
Posted on 7/21/26 at 6:53 am
Posted on 7/21/26 at 6:53 am
quote:
The 2026 FIFA World Cup has given a $20 billion boost to the US economy, according to Bank of America, sparking massive local booms in host cities and helping propel the strongest surge in consumer spending in more than four years.
BofA CEO Brian Moynihan said half of the tournament’s $40 billion in fresh economic activity has been funneled to the US, and that the footprint extends far beyond the turnstiles. The bank’s 70 million consumer customers, who spend more than $400 billion a month, are shelling out 5% to 6% more than a year ago.
“Even when we look into host cities like a Kansas City, we can see the growth rate in spending faster than other cities,” Moynihan said. “So it’s having this on-the-ground economic impact, and that spending is going into what we call bricks-and-mortar — going to bars and restaurants and things like that — not necessarily only the people in the stadium.”
quote:
The tournament’s kick is visible in the geography of the receipts. Brick-and-mortar restaurant spending in host cities jumped two percentage points during the opening weeks, while non-host cities were essentially flat, the bank found — with lower-income consumers driving much of the boom.
Hotels cashed in through price, not just volume. Kansas City saw a roughly 90% jump in renevue per room, while San Francisco saw that figure surge by 55% according to data from CoStar Group.
“In Kansas City, that’s going to dominate your markets quickly,” noted Victor Matheson, a sports economics professor at the College of the Holy Cross. “You’re going to have likely bigger increases in hotel prices because you get capacity constrained a little quicker.”
LINK
Posted on 7/21/26 at 6:56 am to RLDSC FAN
thats awesome. honestly we should host everytime. we are like the only country that didnt have to build anything and we didnt even use most of our stadiums. next time though, no sharing with mexico and canada except mexico can have the muslim teams from the middle east.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:00 am to lsu777
quote:
except mexico can have the muslim teams from the middle east.
Do they have a better pride night than Seattle did?
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:01 am to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
Do they have a better pride night than Seattle did?
true, maybe next time we just host pride game everytime they are playing.....
some will ask why be an a-hole like that.....well because frick em, thats why
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:03 am to lsu777
Unfortunately, service industry workers didn’t get that great of tips. Several bartenders stated that they did not make as much money as they would have liked to have earned.
Too many people these days aren’t tipping 20% or more.
Too many people these days aren’t tipping 20% or more.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:05 am to lsu777
quote:
we are like the only country that didnt have to build anything
Europe and the US can handle it, everyone else has to build and retrofit.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:05 am to Paul Allen
quote:
Unfortunately, service industry workers didn’t get that great of tips. Several bartenders stated that they did not make as much money as they would have liked to have earned.
Too many people these days aren’t tipping 20% or more.
sorry im not normally tipping bartend 20%
that is not standard and that tipping shite is way out of hand.
dont derail the thread, i know it was bait but it was fricking god damn top of the line bait!!
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:06 am to KosmoCramer
quote:
Europe and the US can handle it, everyone else has to build and retrofit.
yea but europe has to spread that MFer out over 25 countries to make it happen. and even then they have to build stuff usually.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:12 am to lsu777
quote:
we are like the only country that didnt have to build anything and we didnt even use most of our stadiums.
The big European soccer nations like England, France, Germany, Spain, Italy could pull it off without building new.
England and Germany could solo under current rules, the rest very easily as a joint bid.
I think a lot of host nations use it as an excuse to build a new "national stadium" though even if it's not really needed for the bid.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:22 am to lsu777
quote:
yea but europe has to spread that MFer out over 25 countries to make it happen
Lisbon to Barcelona is a shorter trip than LA to Dallas.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:23 am to KosmoCramer
quote:
Europe and the US can handle it, everyone else has to build and retrofit.
That’s untrue. There were a lot of locations that spent hundreds of millions in upgrades that were complaining about prior administration’s agreement with the commitments and that they would never recover the cost. New Jersey being the best example.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:26 am to lsuconnman
quote:
That’s untrue. There were a lot of locations that spent hundreds of millions in upgrades that were complaining about prior administration’s agreement with the commitments and that they would never recover the cost. New Jersey being the best example.
outside of doing the grass....what did they have to build? there was no real infrastructure or stadium projects that took years to build thats for sure.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:27 am to BDPops85
quote:
Lisbon to Barcelona is a shorter trip than LA to Dallas.
so a bunch of piss ant small countries? who gives a frick? lmk when they get AC and I may care
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:35 am to RLDSC FAN
We will spend all that dicking around with Iran
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:54 am to lsu777
quote:
like the only country that didnt have to build anything and we didnt even use most of our stadiums
Oh absolutely. Morocco is one of the host nations in 4 years. Gonna be chaotic there I would imagine.
Hot as hell. No indoor stadiums. frick that.
This post was edited on 7/21/26 at 7:55 am
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:55 am to KosmoCramer
quote:
Europe and the US can handle it, everyone else has to build and retrofit.
With this larger WC field, I dont think any one country in europe can cover it. 32 teams was fine for them but the expansion really did a number with logistics.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:55 am to RLDSC FAN
Most of the chatter around Houston was they over spent on preparations and did not pull in the projected economy they planned for.
Posted on 7/21/26 at 7:57 am to lsu777
quote:
outside of doing the grass....what did they have to build? there was no real infrastructure or stadium projects that took years to build thats for sure.
Arrowhead spent a hefty sum on construction. They had to remove large sections of the lower bowl to fit the full size pitch. Took 2 offseasons to get it all done but that was by choice. KC wanted to host and did not complain about the costs.
This post was edited on 7/21/26 at 7:58 am
Popular
Back to top

8









