- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The people that cheered the UHC CEO killing and melting about the Charlie Kirk reaction
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:11 pm to LSUballs
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:11 pm to LSUballs
Not deleting it. I have posted specific reactions to the UHC CEO being shot and killed on here with overwhelming upvote to downvote ratios. I think I’ve proved my point.
My guess is this board is 95% conservative. If conservatives are upvoting a heartless “claim denied” post by a 99% margin, I think it’s safe to say many conservatives on here had the same exact “he deserved it” reaction they are whining about here when it was convenient to them.
My guess is this board is 95% conservative. If conservatives are upvoting a heartless “claim denied” post by a 99% margin, I think it’s safe to say many conservatives on here had the same exact “he deserved it” reaction they are whining about here when it was convenient to them.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:13 pm to Joshjrn
I read what you wrote
You just added a bunch of lawyerspeak to hide what you really mean
Nothing new from you
You just added a bunch of lawyerspeak to hide what you really mean
Nothing new from you
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:15 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
My guess is this board is 95% conservative
This board is 100% not liberal, which of course is not possible
Will you at least admit it?
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:17 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
My guess is this board is 95% conservative. If conservatives are upvoting a heartless “claim denied” post by a 99% margin, I think it’s safe to say many conservatives on here had the same exact “he deserved it” reaction they are whining about here when it was convenient to them.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:17 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
TheWalrus
Its always these soy boy **** like this guy
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:18 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
I personally thought the celebration of Luigi Mangione was horrific as well.
It was. There are people that have blood on their hands, and then there are people that actively try to mass murder large groups of people like Bin Laden. There is a wide chasm between the two.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:18 pm to Sun God
quote:
I read what you wrote
You just added a bunch of lawyerspeak to hide what you really mean
Nothing new from you
Sure, "I think it makes someone a hypocrite if they celebrate one person's death but get upset if someone celebrates another person's death" is just the height of "lawyerspeak"...
I think the people who celebrated Ginsberg's death are fricking ghouls.
I think the people celebrating Kirk's death are fricking ghouls.
I think the people who celebrated one and cried about people celebrating the other are hypocritical ghouls.
Non-lawerly enough for you?
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:19 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
How hypocritical is that?
quote:
by TheWalrus
I guess sometimes you’re the eggman and sometimes the walrus.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:21 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
As society breaks down, people target those in power. Scary, but I think we need to buckle up because it's only going to get worse.
quote:
Posted by Jcorye1
12/4/24 at 8:20 am
I hate when I'm right.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:22 pm to TheWalrus
The same people are cheering both moron.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:23 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
With that said, if you want to paint with a hypocrisy brush, I would say people utterly gleeful about RBG's death melting about people being utterly gleeful about Kirk's death, and vice versa, are hypocrites of the highest order.
this is not hypocrisy, it’s whataboutism.
We don’t need a convoluted smug “gotcha” to agree on that baseline.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:24 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
How hypocritical is that?
How dare you call the poli board hypocritical
quote:
Social media is the main problem, along with a media, academia and cultural complex that calls anyone to the right of Stalin a Nazi.
Both sides have been doing this for years....
report confirms the Left have gone full Nazi
Tigerdroppings 2020
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:24 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
The people that cheered the UHC CEO killing and melting about the Charlie Kirk reaction
Maybe you meant to compare those who are upset about Kirk but were not upset about the murder of Melissa Hortman and her husband or the hammer attack on Paul Pelosi.
Regardless of what you meant, anyone who cheers political murder is a scumbag a-hole.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:25 pm to Joshjrn
It’s always the fricking same with posters like you and I’m not sure how you don’t understand that
ETA: TBoy and Corinthians immediately posting is peak fricking comedy
ETA: TBoy and Corinthians immediately posting is peak fricking comedy
This post was edited on 9/11/25 at 12:27 pm
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:26 pm to Sun God
quote:
It’s always the fricking same with posters like you and I’m not sure how you don’t understand that
frick you.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:27 pm to TBoy
quote:
the hammer attack on Paul Pelosi.
This wasn't cheered, only laughed at and made a gay lover joke of. Everyone being serious was upset by it.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:28 pm to Klark Kent
quote:
this is not hypocrisy, it’s whataboutism.
We don’t need a convoluted smug “gotcha” to agree on that baseline.
No, whataboutism would be defending being gleeful about Kirk's death because other people were gleeful about RGB's death.
Condemning the hypocrisy of both isn't whataboutism.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:33 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
Condemning the hypocrisy of both isn't whataboutism.
call it what you like, we know your intentions.
Popular
Back to top



2





