re: The over representation of homosexuality

Leftist love to virtue signal.

quote:

---

Most are too lazy. They’d rather let the iPad raise their kids so they can post here and binge shitty shows like Sandman.

---

I think there is a lot of truth to this.

Hell, I just spent an hour shite posting on the OT. Think that changed anyone’s minds?

iPhones and streaming media have changed the way we think and spend our time. I’ve certainly pissed away too much of it.

I’m out. Enough internet for one day.

Sir, we live in a world that has gays, and those gays have to be guarded by men with media control. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Amy Shumer? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for homosexuality, and you curse the LGBTQ community. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that Monkeypox news, while tragic, probably saved lives; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives.

You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at anti-homo orgies, you want me making alphabet soup -- you need me pushing the soup

We use words like "queen," "decadence," "butch." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending the rainbow lifestyle. You use them as a punch line.

I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a straight man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the sexual freedom that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it.

I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you put on some assless chaps and stand on Bourbon street. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think of pro-homo television.

quote:

---

They’re not, you just can’t handle that gay people are a normal part of society and are becoming accepted as such.

---

I’m not melting like the OP. Over representation just makes me eyeroll, not cancel services or rage post.

But gays aren’t really a normal part of society. It’s existed on the fringe for most of human history.

Whether it’s by nature or nurture, homosexuals are removed from the gene pool and inherently not moving society forward. We exist to procreate and pass on.

I’m glad that loving homosexual families can adopt and that advances in surrogacy can allow them to have children. Despite my moral misgivings on homosexuality, better for children to be brought in to the world and cared for than the alternative.

But they really aren’t a part of society in the way that they’ve traditionally been for most of human history. We accept it as a norm because of lack of other societal problems and advances in science, and I’m glad that we’ve run out of real problems.

quote:

---

Except as a parent, you can’t, because Disney, Nickelodeon, and even Sesame Street push this filth.

---

Best thing you can do for your kids is to keep them away from pop culture. Its the mechanism for dumbing down the masses.

quote:

---

none of that was as on the nose as the LBTQAIXYZ+ shite that episodes are being centered around these days. You are comparing apples and oranges. And you know this.

---

I actually agree with his overall sentiments, but when Progressives make arguments like the one above, that's when they completely lose me.

quote:

---

ohh, we’re going with the keep my head in the sand because this doesn’t directly effect me deflection tactic now.

---

Explain how this affects you.

quote:

---

yawn. at least attempt to argue back why you think LBTQAIXYZ+ content is appropriate for young children, since it’s this important to you apparently.

---

It's pretty simple. Raise your own kids as you see fit and shut the frick up about how others raise theirs.

If you watch the shows on the major networks, you'd swear every fire station and police precincts are 50% homo.