
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:08 pm to Ricardo
quote:
Psychotic people don’t plot murder. They just snap. She coldly killed her children. That’s vicious. Worse than a mad dog.
Did you forget the part where she ran thru a 2nd floor glass window, paralyzing herself in the process in an attempt to kill yoirself. What sane person does that?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:10 pm to evil cockroach
quote:
Meh. If it was 11-1, the state won’t retry . So, it’s the same result.
They absolutely will retry, if they can get a jury of 6+ men they can easily win. They also need to sequester the jury.
women are way more susceptible to being pack animals and going along with the consensus.
If you have enough rational men on the jury they can actually built consensus int he other direction.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:11 pm to jimlsu1
How do you know it was 11-1 to acquit?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:11 pm to NotStupid
quote:
NotStupid
Look at this stupid fricking retard inbred frick standing up for the baby killer.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:13 pm to NotoriousFSU
quote:
If there’s one takeaway from this story that’s truly bizarre it’s how many women out there that are apparently comfortable with killing babies.
They are only comfortable with it if it's a woman doing it.
Fathers who kill their children get rightly called monsters by everyone.
Women are so brainwashed into dodging accountability they will defend a woman who does anything, including the worst possible crimes imaginable.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:15 pm to War Eagle 777
quote:
State has already announced they will retry. If they drop charges she walks.
She is paraplegic, she aint walking anywhere .
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:17 pm to NotStupid
quote:
Did you forget the part where she ran thru a 2nd floor glass window, paralyzing herself in the process in an attempt to kill yoirself. What sane person does that?
quote:False advertising
NotStupid
Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:17 pm to jimlsu1
quote:
The one juror in the Clancy case
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/4/26 at 10:18 pm to jimlsu1
God bless this man for holding onto his moral values especially in a state that just made it illegal to kill your child the moment before birth. How sick are these people?
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:00 pm to bulletprooftiger
Think about how these murders happened. She researched on Google how long it takes to go from place A to place B. She sent her husband to pick up food and prescriptions from place A to place B and then she took each one of her children into the basement to asphyxiate them with an excercise band.
It takes 3-5 minutes to asphyxiate someone. All the while you are there looking at them, they are staring in your eyes flailing about. It’s one thing if it’s some stranger that’s attacked you that you that you overcame. No this is your child dying thinking that you loved them. How sick and demonic. The women who support her are sick and demonic as well.
It takes 3-5 minutes to asphyxiate someone. All the while you are there looking at them, they are staring in your eyes flailing about. It’s one thing if it’s some stranger that’s attacked you that you that you overcame. No this is your child dying thinking that you loved them. How sick and demonic. The women who support her are sick and demonic as well.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 11:23 pm to kayjay
quote:
Think about how these murders happened. She researched on Google how long it takes to go from place A to place B. She sent her husband to pick up food and prescriptions from place A to place B and then she took each one of her children into the basement to asphyxiate them with an excercise band.
It takes 3-5 minutes to asphyxiate someone. All the while you are there looking at them, they are staring in your eyes flailing about. It’s one thing if it’s some stranger that’s attacked you that you that you overcame. No this is your child dying thinking that you loved them. How sick and demonic. The women who support her are sick and demonic as well.
She also doctor shopped and RX shopped. She would see a doctor and tell them about symptom XYZ to get certain meds. Then she would meet with doctor 2 and say she had symptoms ABC and not mention doctor and RX from doctor 1. She did this with 5 doctors. None knew of one another. She also wasn't taking her meds. She was a nurse so she knew what to say. That is why she had so many meds.
When she murdered the kids it was also the first time she had psychosis and she hasn't had an episode since.
Very convenient excuse since she lives in one of the few states where you can just claim this and the prosecution has to prove you were not crazy instead of the other way around. By some basic logic anyone killing their kids is insane so it is a solid strategy and an obvious deficiency in the law.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 11:34 pm
Posted on 9/5/26 at 12:16 am to finchmeister08
Posted on 9/5/26 at 12:24 am to kayjay
quote:
The women who support her are sick and demonic as well.
There’s a new group forming this applies too: ‘you weren’t on the jury, you don’t have all the facts’
Posted on 9/5/26 at 4:57 am to SWLA92
Are we sure they voted not guilty
The jury had lots for choices from what i understand
1. First-degree murder — life in prison without parole.
2. Second-degree murder — life imprisonment, but with the possibility of parole.
3. Manslaughter — potentially up to 20 years per count.
4. Not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility — essentially the Massachusetts insanity defense. This would not mean she simply walks free; she could be committed to a psychiatric facility following evaluation.
5. Not guilty — a complete acquittal.
The jury had lots for choices from what i understand
1. First-degree murder — life in prison without parole.
2. Second-degree murder — life imprisonment, but with the possibility of parole.
3. Manslaughter — potentially up to 20 years per count.
4. Not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility — essentially the Massachusetts insanity defense. This would not mean she simply walks free; she could be committed to a psychiatric facility following evaluation.
5. Not guilty — a complete acquittal.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 5:06 am to Dubosed
quote:
frickin shame it was only 1 person
What would the narrative from MSM be had it been 11-1 guilty?
“One lone juror stood firm today for justice…”
Posted on 9/5/26 at 5:28 am to jimlsu1
he was the one everybody was pissed at Good for him for telling em to go frick themselves
Posted on 9/5/26 at 5:48 am to St Augustine
quote:
Dude is a hero.
If someone killed my 3 kids neither the identity nor circumstances would make any difference. There would be no need for a jury.
Good for this man doing what her husband should have and standing up for 3 murdered babies.
Lastly frick that crazy bitch, we as a society used to place a value on protecting our families from crazy people, we don’t have the balls to admit when someone shouldn’t be around other people because it’s not pretty. Neither is letting a bunch of unhinged drugged up lunatics go around killing people, putting people in the loony bin wasn’t a pleasant thing, the alternative is far worse.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 6:27 am to Hot Carl
quote:
Can you imagine the stones on this dude to hold steadfast in his belief with all the pressure from the other 11 jurors
Yep.
No way in he'll would I have caved on this shite.
There is a red line and strangling kids definitely is wayyyyy past it.
Tell those other 11 to frick off. Especially the other 2 "men" on the Jury.
Posted on 9/5/26 at 6:48 am to thejudge
quote:
No way in he'll would I have caved on this shite.
Is your handle thejudge a reference to the car ? Or are you in fact an actual judge ? Or something else ?
In any case, I dont think most here have any clue how they'd react to the jury scenario in this case.. Way too many fake tough guys here, in my opinion .

Popular
Back to top



0











