- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The future of the 8-5, M-F, daily work commute?
Posted on 5/28/24 at 9:32 am to burger bearcat
Posted on 5/28/24 at 9:32 am to burger bearcat
Move closer to your job
Posted on 5/28/24 at 9:34 am to NIH
quote:
Depends on what you do. I can see how someone who practices tax law may not need in-person interaction or support. I don’t know how litigators are fully remote when courts are increasingly ditching zoom.
While having some kind of office presence with support staff is necessary from a client acquisition/payment perspective, nearly every true litigator I know would prefer to prepare for major hearings and trials outside of the office. It’s just too hard to dive deep into an issue when you’re constantly interrupted by subordinates with questions, client phone calls, etc, etc.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 9:34 am to SouthPlains
This thread, like all the other WFH threads, is full of worthless middle management types who’ve come to realize their jobs are not necessary, so they’re desperate to justify coming in to an office.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 9:36 am to HeadSlash
quote:
Move closer to your job
I hope you’re not also one of those “there isn’t a housing issue; people just need to move to less desirable areas and buy cheaper house” people

Posted on 5/28/24 at 9:36 am to Jimbojambojumbo
quote:
hose are some rich, powerful and connected people who stand to lose a ton on those properties - and they will fight to keep that structure in-place to keep those dollars rolling in.
Shouldve diversified.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 9:41 am to burger bearcat
It doesn't matter if people work from home or from the office--you all are posting on an internet forum on the clock, whether it be from your couch or your cubicle.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 9:52 am to whoa
quote:
I’m not against WFH but I feel like a lot of the pushback against it could be fixed by adjusting working hours. I don’t need 40 hours a week, 8 hours a day to get my job done.
I’d happily work 8-2 in an office M-F.
I wouldn't mind some sort of hybrid schedule, for example my neighbor works from 8-12 in office M-F and then works the afternoon at home. Or even better would be something like in office 2 days per week. But, on the other hand that does take away from one of the main selling points for me about having a remote job, which is that I'm not tied to the economy of wherever I choose to live. If for some reason I have/want to pick up and move across the country tomorrow, I could do it and wouldn't have to search for a job once we got there, and I'm not limited to living only in areas that jobs available in my field. I work in a very specific specialty within relatively small field and there are probably only 20-30 potential jobs that do what I do in the state of Louisiana.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 9:54 am to GeauxTigers0107
You are such a cool guy manager!!!! I bet people love working for you being a big tough guy like that!!!!! I promise you.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 10:04 am to burger bearcat
One thing I am tired of is only being given 1-2 weeks PTO per year. It's just not enough to prevent burnout. Give people more time off and the bitching about M-F 8-5 goes away.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 10:12 am to fallguy_1978
At some point, employee performance has to outweigh going into work for worthless zoom meetings.
Maybe it can even be incentive based depending on career path.
Maybe it can even be incentive based depending on career path.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 10:38 am to burger bearcat
1. Some jobs simply don’t work remote, but many can, and should be.
2. The jobs which become fully remote are extremely vulnerable to outsourcing to South Asia.
3. Many justify in-person work just to justify their own positions or sunk cost of commercial real estate.
4. Some workers are not productive remote, but some are. It basically comes down to whether someone is internally vs externally motivated. The externally motivated worker will work (or appear to work) only when someone is watching. These workers are completely unproductive remotely and barely produce anything in person. They probably shouldn’t have jobs, but they create a lot of work for middle managers to coach and identify.
5. Internally motivated workers will work regardless of where they’re at.
6. Personally, I am less productive remote. Granted, I work in a field where I have to talk to my coworkers frequently to bounce ideas and check work. I like having some compartmentalization between my work life and home life. With that said, I also have a relatively short commute.
7. I find my home to be full of distractions. As a result, my preference is for a hybrid approach so that I can easily work from the road or home if I want to, but also come into a physical location away from my home when I want to/need to.
8. I like the ability to, on a long road trip when I’m not driving during the day, to plug in my laptop and a wifi hotspot and do my work. This saves me from using my precious PTO which I have so little of. I also like that I won’t be punished by an airline f$&king up my flight home. I can just plug my laptop in by the hotel pool or in the airport and work there instead of being docked an extra day due to a screwup that wasn’t my own.
None of these would be as big a deal if offices worked 4 10’s and offered 3-4 weeks of PTO standard instead of 1-2.
2. The jobs which become fully remote are extremely vulnerable to outsourcing to South Asia.
3. Many justify in-person work just to justify their own positions or sunk cost of commercial real estate.
4. Some workers are not productive remote, but some are. It basically comes down to whether someone is internally vs externally motivated. The externally motivated worker will work (or appear to work) only when someone is watching. These workers are completely unproductive remotely and barely produce anything in person. They probably shouldn’t have jobs, but they create a lot of work for middle managers to coach and identify.
5. Internally motivated workers will work regardless of where they’re at.
6. Personally, I am less productive remote. Granted, I work in a field where I have to talk to my coworkers frequently to bounce ideas and check work. I like having some compartmentalization between my work life and home life. With that said, I also have a relatively short commute.
7. I find my home to be full of distractions. As a result, my preference is for a hybrid approach so that I can easily work from the road or home if I want to, but also come into a physical location away from my home when I want to/need to.
8. I like the ability to, on a long road trip when I’m not driving during the day, to plug in my laptop and a wifi hotspot and do my work. This saves me from using my precious PTO which I have so little of. I also like that I won’t be punished by an airline f$&king up my flight home. I can just plug my laptop in by the hotel pool or in the airport and work there instead of being docked an extra day due to a screwup that wasn’t my own.
None of these would be as big a deal if offices worked 4 10’s and offered 3-4 weeks of PTO standard instead of 1-2.
This post was edited on 5/28/24 at 10:43 am
Posted on 5/28/24 at 10:45 am to jcaz
quote:
One thing I am tired of is only being given 1-2 weeks PTO per year. It's just not enough to prevent burnout. Give people more time off and the bitching about M-F 8-5 goes away.
Yeah 5-10 days blows for PTO. I get 27 days now.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 10:47 am to burger bearcat
quote:
It seems this business model is going away. Especially with office workers.
Sort of. The data is sparse but what I've been able to find indicates that pure WFH spiked during COVID but has dropped fairly continuously since then. What's increased is the use of the hybrid model (offering a mix of in-office and WFH hours).
The biggest issues I've seen with pure WFH are with jobs which require a high level of in-person collaboration (like with my wife's job of rescheduling flight crews who get sick, time out, etc) as well as those workers who just suck at self-managing (meaning they stop getting their work done in a timely manner).
For me, WFH was freaking awesome. Not only did it give me a lot more focus for getting my job done (fewer interruptions by people stopping by my desk with random questions/issues) but we ended up getting a lot fewer calls due to so many of our users having to be a bit more self-reliant and not using as many work resources (mainly printers/copiers).
Posted on 5/28/24 at 10:51 am to Bard
I prefer the hybrid model, even more specific I'd love one week in, one week WFH. By the time my in office week is up, I'm tired of commuting, and at the end of WFH week, I'm ready to be back in the office. I think it's a perfect mix. Too bad no one does that.
Maybe I should as HR to bring this schedule up for discussion.

Maybe I should as HR to bring this schedule up for discussion.

This post was edited on 5/28/24 at 10:52 am
Posted on 5/28/24 at 11:23 am to Oates Mustache
Nobody really cares if I come to the office every week, but I go in a day or two most weeks. I just get tired of being home all the time.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 11:25 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
There are many companies out there making an absolute killing with a 100% remote workforce. It’s very doable if you hire adults.
These “adults” are the first ones that get laid off too.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 11:36 am to GeauxTigers0107
Then you may not value a good employee.
I've have a employee that requested to continue wfh and it was granted because he is an absolute monster and his numbers back it up.
I've had others that were required to come back in to the office . They were not happy but I can show them their numbers in office and out.
I would take a complete team of WFH if they all were as productive as the 1st employee.
I've have a employee that requested to continue wfh and it was granted because he is an absolute monster and his numbers back it up.
I've had others that were required to come back in to the office . They were not happy but I can show them their numbers in office and out.
I would take a complete team of WFH if they all were as productive as the 1st employee.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 11:39 am to Mo Jeaux
quote:
Mo Jeaux
Swing and a miss yet again. Nothing new for you though.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 11:45 am to GeauxTigers0107
My job requires 24-hour availability to address field operational issues. I do not understand the difference between me answering the phone at 2pm while seated at my desk versus 2am when I am awoken. If an office presence is essential, then I shouldn’t be able to answer field questions outside of normal business hours.
That being said, I value the hybrid work model. A traditional office venue is needed, at times.
That being said, I value the hybrid work model. A traditional office venue is needed, at times.
Posted on 5/28/24 at 11:47 am to jcaz
quote:
One thing I am tired of is only being given 1-2 weeks PTO per year. It's just not enough to prevent burnout. Give people more time off and the bitching about M-F 8-5 goes away.
I agree that there’s definitely a floor that you’d want to be above, but I get 20 days and if someone told me I had to choose between 15 days/full remote and 20 days/hybrid, I’d ditch those five days without thinking.
Maybe once the kids are older I’d make a different decision but not today

Popular
Back to top
