Started By
Message

re: The bloodiest battle in human history ended 83 years ago today...

Posted on 2/2/26 at 9:39 am to
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17487 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 9:39 am to
quote:

He was a moron to fight a 2-front war, in the onset of winter, with limited oil. He got cocky after the initial blitzkreigs worked.


Bingo. He had the Soviet Union sitting on their hands and could have focused his forces and assets to the western front... therefore being much more formidable to the allies and making an already difficult war a more difficult one.

But that ego bubble popped and he began to break the most basic tenets of warfare.

Good for the allies he got stupid when it counted.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71158 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 9:46 am to
quote:

He had the Soviet Union sitting on their hands and could have focused his forces and assets to the western front... therefore being much more formidable to the allies and making an already difficult war a more difficult one.


People who say this don't understand Hitler. His stated goal since the 1920s had been to conquer lands to the east of Germany for living space for the German people. His whole reason for existing as a political entity was to invade the Soviet Union. That's all he cared about.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17487 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:03 am to
quote:

People who say this don't understand Hitler. His stated goal since the 1920s had been to conquer lands to the east of Germany for living space for the German people. His whole reason for existing as a political entity was to invade the Soviet Union. That's all he cared about.


Oh I'm not saying he didn't have intentions to conquer land to the east. He certainly, undoubtedly, did. He just got impatient and began to divide resources when that is a highly risky and usually devastating tactical move.
Posted by WWII Collector
Member since Oct 2018
9025 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:07 am to
I've always thought this photo was interesting... To just casually walk by this stuff as she goes on with her life.




and this guy wearing a tie.

This post was edited on 2/2/26 at 10:10 am
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130289 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:39 am to
quote:

People who say this don't understand Hitler. His stated goal since the 1920s had been to conquer lands to the east of Germany for living space for the German people. His whole reason for existing as a political entity was to invade the Soviet Union. That's all he cared about.



I guess I never spent a lot of time thinking about his reasoning, but what was the reason for going West first and conquering instead of going East, if that's "all he cared about"
Posted by LA Lightning
Member since Jun 2023
844 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:47 am to
quote:

and this guy wearing a tie.


A D-Day veteran recalled that one of the soldiers landing on the beach in the first wave with him wore a garish colorful necktie, saying that the Germans would see it and be frightened of him. Later on the beach he saw a soldier stumbling around disoriented with his shoulder and arm blown off - wearing that tie. Countless millions of similar horrors were experienced by all sides and civilians throughout the war, and other wars. Truly is hell.
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
3996 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:52 am to
quote:

I guess I never spent a lot of time thinking about his reasoning

He wrote a book about it...

"We take up where we broke off six hundred years ago. We stop the endless movement towards the south and west of Europe, and turn our gaze towards the lands of the east. At long last we put a stop to the colonial and commercial policy of pre-war days and pass over to the territorial policy of the future. But when we speak of new territory in Europe today we must think principally of Russia and her border vassal states. Destiny itself seems to wish to point out the way to us here... This colossal Empire in the east is ripe for dissolution, and the end of the Jewish domination in Russia will also be the end of Russia as a state."

- A. Hitler, Mein Kampf, 1925
quote:

what was the reason for going West first and conquering instead of going East, if that's "all he cared about"

He didn't want to fight on two fronts simultaneously.
Posted by Master of Sinanju
Member since Feb 2012
12151 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:56 am to
quote:

what was the reason for going West first and conquering instead of going East, if that's "all he cared about"


Poland was first. Then France only after the Allies declared war. He viewed the West as weak and little more than a distraction from his true goal in the east.
Posted by LA Lightning
Member since Jun 2023
844 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:09 am to
quote:

I guess I never spent a lot of time thinking about his reasoning, but what was the reason for going West first and conquering instead of going East, if that's "all he cared about"


Hitler had made a non-aggression pact with Stalin, to provide for the division of lands lying between Germany and Russia, the objective being to keep Stalin pacified until he was ready. His army entered Austria bloodlessly the night before an Austrian national referendum on whether to join Germany, fearing the outcome of the vote might be unfavorable. He proceeded on to Czechoslovakia, with no real consequences. This emboldened him to attack Poland in 1939, but Britain and France had a treaty with Poland that required them to declare war on Germany, thus causing Hitler to turn to the West to deal with France and Britain. His timeline for attacking Russia was also delayed by the necessity of helping the Italians in the Balkans and Africa.

He made numerous tactical and judgmental errors. Stalingrad had little logistical value. He would have been better served to throw his might at Moscow and sooner in the year, rather than splitting up his forces into multiple objectives in the manner he did. Had too much belief in the invincible quality of his armies.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
134653 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:16 am to
Enemy at the Gates is a phenomenal movie


Any other good Stalingrad movies?
Posted by Sam Quint
Member since Sep 2022
8886 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:21 am to
quote:

I guess I never spent a lot of time thinking about his reasoning, but what was the reason for going West first and conquering instead of going East, if that's "all he cared about"

generally speaking, for the same reason that Germany invaded France in 1914...to take care of that pesky western flank in order to deal with the real problem to the east. almost worked both times, but didnt work either time.
Posted by Sam Quint
Member since Sep 2022
8886 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:22 am to
quote:


Enemy at the Gates is a phenomenal movie

could have done without the stupid wedged in love story, but yeah - great movie
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42643 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:23 am to
The land war in the West had ended for all practical purposes. Hitler didn’t fear a British invasion and he couldn’t invade Britain.

But he got involved in Africa and later in Greece. This tied up some of his manpower and took away from his munitions and supplies.

If Hitler had won the battle for the Mediterranean and the Midfdle East then he could have consolidated his gains and turned on Russia much later.

Of course no one knows how Stalin or FDR would have acted if Germany would have done all that?

But we all agree Hitler spread his forced and when he tried go take the Caucuses as d Stalingrad all at the same time it was way too much.
Posted by 03 West CoChamps
Member since Sep 2024
869 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:25 am to
I'm listening to BFA right now and plan on listening to GotO next. Just finished KoK's for the 4th time.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122173 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:32 am to
I had an aunt.. She had a daughter who died from cancer.. This was in the 90s. Soon after her daughter passed away she was diagnosed and passed away while being treated. Before she passed away she said she was convinced hell is on Earth. That always stuck with me.

Anytime I see images of war I think about that because. War does seem like hell on Earth.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42293 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:46 am to
quote:

Bingo. He had the Soviet Union sitting on their hands and could have focused his forces and assets to the western front... therefore being much more formidable to the allies and making an already difficult war a more difficult one. But that ego bubble popped and he began to break the most basic tenets of warfare.


It wasn’t ego bubble. The NAZI’s viewed the Slavs as sub humans when viewed through the lens of racial superiority. Nazi germany couldn’t have a Slavic power just sitting on their border. There was always going to be war between Germany and Russia.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
17487 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

It wasn’t ego bubble.


Not the ego of a vision of being superior to the Soviets and surrounding.

The ego of believing Germany had the resources to overcome every warning of unsound strategy repeated all the way back to Sun Tzu.

They had the east temporarily taken care of with a treaty the Germans never intended on following in the long term. This secured the east for them while they could have focused on the west until it was fully under control.

It may be a brain fart here... but I don't remember a single battle where a division of force was successful in the face of superior numbers other than Lee and Jackson at Chancellorsville.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42293 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 12:06 pm to
Please indulge my tangent

quote:

Sun Tzu.


I recently read that “The Art of War” was not written for generals and military minds like many people believe, but rather for spoiled, incompetent, nepobabies of the aristocracy that had been given command positions over actual troops and militaries.

Kinda makes why the consultant class of Ivy League MBA’s love his writings so much.
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
3996 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

turned on Russia much later.

Too late. Russia was industrializing quickly. During the 30s Stalin had a steel mill built in Magnetogorsk modeled after the US Steel plant in Gary, In. - at the time, the largest in the world. Magnetogorsk is located east of the Urals, out of Hitler's reach. Over time, more and more Soviet industrial capacity would move east of the Urals.

Saving Italy's arse in Greece is really what fricked Hitler and set the whole timeline back. He needed to attack sooner, not later.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
71158 posts
Posted on 2/2/26 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

He would have been better served to throw his might at Moscow and sooner in the year, rather than splitting up his forces into multiple objectives in the manner he did. Had too much belief in the invincible quality of his armies.


Any offensive he made in 1942 was doomed to failure regardless of where it hit. The Germans had pretty much killed whatever chance they had to militarily win the war when they failed to take Moscow in December 1941. For the whole of Operation Barbarossa, the Wehrmacht suffered over one million casualties. Their panzer divisions had been wrecked, with some down to fewer than 20 tanks from an initial strength of 150. They didn't have enough strength to launch another attack on Moscow, as that was the most heavily defended part of the line and the point where Stavka expected the Germans to try to hit again.

So Hitler decided to go for the oil fields of southern Russia. Okay. Fine. But let's say you manage to capture the oil fields intact (which the Russians weren't going to let happen). How are you going to transport that oil out of the region, refine it, and distribute it to your units? How are you going to protect it from Allied bombing raids coming from Iraq and Iran? How are you going to hold off the eventual Russian counterattack?

There was no way for Fall Blau to have succeeded. It was a fool's errand.
This post was edited on 2/2/26 at 12:57 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram