- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The bloodiest battle in human history ended 83 years ago today...
Posted on 2/2/26 at 9:39 am to VolsOut4Harambe
Posted on 2/2/26 at 9:39 am to VolsOut4Harambe
quote:
He was a moron to fight a 2-front war, in the onset of winter, with limited oil. He got cocky after the initial blitzkreigs worked.
Bingo. He had the Soviet Union sitting on their hands and could have focused his forces and assets to the western front... therefore being much more formidable to the allies and making an already difficult war a more difficult one.
But that ego bubble popped and he began to break the most basic tenets of warfare.
Good for the allies he got stupid when it counted.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 9:46 am to CleverUserName
quote:
He had the Soviet Union sitting on their hands and could have focused his forces and assets to the western front... therefore being much more formidable to the allies and making an already difficult war a more difficult one.
People who say this don't understand Hitler. His stated goal since the 1920s had been to conquer lands to the east of Germany for living space for the German people. His whole reason for existing as a political entity was to invade the Soviet Union. That's all he cared about.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:03 am to RollTide1987
quote:
People who say this don't understand Hitler. His stated goal since the 1920s had been to conquer lands to the east of Germany for living space for the German people. His whole reason for existing as a political entity was to invade the Soviet Union. That's all he cared about.
Oh I'm not saying he didn't have intentions to conquer land to the east. He certainly, undoubtedly, did. He just got impatient and began to divide resources when that is a highly risky and usually devastating tactical move.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:07 am to RollTide1987
I've always thought this photo was interesting... To just casually walk by this stuff as she goes on with her life.
and this guy wearing a tie.

and this guy wearing a tie.

This post was edited on 2/2/26 at 10:10 am
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:39 am to RollTide1987
quote:
People who say this don't understand Hitler. His stated goal since the 1920s had been to conquer lands to the east of Germany for living space for the German people. His whole reason for existing as a political entity was to invade the Soviet Union. That's all he cared about.
I guess I never spent a lot of time thinking about his reasoning, but what was the reason for going West first and conquering instead of going East, if that's "all he cared about"
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:47 am to WWII Collector
quote:
and this guy wearing a tie.
A D-Day veteran recalled that one of the soldiers landing on the beach in the first wave with him wore a garish colorful necktie, saying that the Germans would see it and be frightened of him. Later on the beach he saw a soldier stumbling around disoriented with his shoulder and arm blown off - wearing that tie. Countless millions of similar horrors were experienced by all sides and civilians throughout the war, and other wars. Truly is hell.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:52 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I guess I never spent a lot of time thinking about his reasoning
He wrote a book about it...
"We take up where we broke off six hundred years ago. We stop the endless movement towards the south and west of Europe, and turn our gaze towards the lands of the east. At long last we put a stop to the colonial and commercial policy of pre-war days and pass over to the territorial policy of the future. But when we speak of new territory in Europe today we must think principally of Russia and her border vassal states. Destiny itself seems to wish to point out the way to us here... This colossal Empire in the east is ripe for dissolution, and the end of the Jewish domination in Russia will also be the end of Russia as a state."
- A. Hitler, Mein Kampf, 1925
quote:
what was the reason for going West first and conquering instead of going East, if that's "all he cared about"
He didn't want to fight on two fronts simultaneously.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 10:56 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
what was the reason for going West first and conquering instead of going East, if that's "all he cared about"
Poland was first. Then France only after the Allies declared war. He viewed the West as weak and little more than a distraction from his true goal in the east.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:09 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I guess I never spent a lot of time thinking about his reasoning, but what was the reason for going West first and conquering instead of going East, if that's "all he cared about"
Hitler had made a non-aggression pact with Stalin, to provide for the division of lands lying between Germany and Russia, the objective being to keep Stalin pacified until he was ready. His army entered Austria bloodlessly the night before an Austrian national referendum on whether to join Germany, fearing the outcome of the vote might be unfavorable. He proceeded on to Czechoslovakia, with no real consequences. This emboldened him to attack Poland in 1939, but Britain and France had a treaty with Poland that required them to declare war on Germany, thus causing Hitler to turn to the West to deal with France and Britain. His timeline for attacking Russia was also delayed by the necessity of helping the Italians in the Balkans and Africa.
He made numerous tactical and judgmental errors. Stalingrad had little logistical value. He would have been better served to throw his might at Moscow and sooner in the year, rather than splitting up his forces into multiple objectives in the manner he did. Had too much belief in the invincible quality of his armies.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:16 am to RollTide1987
Enemy at the Gates is a phenomenal movie
Any other good Stalingrad movies?
Any other good Stalingrad movies?
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:21 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I guess I never spent a lot of time thinking about his reasoning, but what was the reason for going West first and conquering instead of going East, if that's "all he cared about"
generally speaking, for the same reason that Germany invaded France in 1914...to take care of that pesky western flank in order to deal with the real problem to the east. almost worked both times, but didnt work either time.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:22 am to fr33manator
quote:
Enemy at the Gates is a phenomenal movie
could have done without the stupid wedged in love story, but yeah - great movie
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:23 am to LA Lightning
The land war in the West had ended for all practical purposes. Hitler didn’t fear a British invasion and he couldn’t invade Britain.
But he got involved in Africa and later in Greece. This tied up some of his manpower and took away from his munitions and supplies.
If Hitler had won the battle for the Mediterranean and the Midfdle East then he could have consolidated his gains and turned on Russia much later.
Of course no one knows how Stalin or FDR would have acted if Germany would have done all that?
But we all agree Hitler spread his forced and when he tried go take the Caucuses as d Stalingrad all at the same time it was way too much.
But he got involved in Africa and later in Greece. This tied up some of his manpower and took away from his munitions and supplies.
If Hitler had won the battle for the Mediterranean and the Midfdle East then he could have consolidated his gains and turned on Russia much later.
Of course no one knows how Stalin or FDR would have acted if Germany would have done all that?
But we all agree Hitler spread his forced and when he tried go take the Caucuses as d Stalingrad all at the same time it was way too much.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:25 am to Oilfieldbiology
I'm listening to BFA right now and plan on listening to GotO next. Just finished KoK's for the 4th time.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:32 am to RollTide1987
I had an aunt.. She had a daughter who died from cancer.. This was in the 90s. Soon after her daughter passed away she was diagnosed and passed away while being treated. Before she passed away she said she was convinced hell is on Earth. That always stuck with me.
Anytime I see images of war I think about that because. War does seem like hell on Earth.
Anytime I see images of war I think about that because. War does seem like hell on Earth.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:46 am to CleverUserName
quote:
Bingo. He had the Soviet Union sitting on their hands and could have focused his forces and assets to the western front... therefore being much more formidable to the allies and making an already difficult war a more difficult one. But that ego bubble popped and he began to break the most basic tenets of warfare.
It wasn’t ego bubble. The NAZI’s viewed the Slavs as sub humans when viewed through the lens of racial superiority. Nazi germany couldn’t have a Slavic power just sitting on their border. There was always going to be war between Germany and Russia.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 12:00 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
It wasn’t ego bubble.
Not the ego of a vision of being superior to the Soviets and surrounding.
The ego of believing Germany had the resources to overcome every warning of unsound strategy repeated all the way back to Sun Tzu.
They had the east temporarily taken care of with a treaty the Germans never intended on following in the long term. This secured the east for them while they could have focused on the west until it was fully under control.
It may be a brain fart here... but I don't remember a single battle where a division of force was successful in the face of superior numbers other than Lee and Jackson at Chancellorsville.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 12:06 pm to CleverUserName
Please indulge my tangent
I recently read that “The Art of War” was not written for generals and military minds like many people believe, but rather for spoiled, incompetent, nepobabies of the aristocracy that had been given command positions over actual troops and militaries.
Kinda makes why the consultant class of Ivy League MBA’s love his writings so much.
quote:
Sun Tzu.
I recently read that “The Art of War” was not written for generals and military minds like many people believe, but rather for spoiled, incompetent, nepobabies of the aristocracy that had been given command positions over actual troops and militaries.
Kinda makes why the consultant class of Ivy League MBA’s love his writings so much.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 12:17 pm to doubleb
quote:
turned on Russia much later.
Too late. Russia was industrializing quickly. During the 30s Stalin had a steel mill built in Magnetogorsk modeled after the US Steel plant in Gary, In. - at the time, the largest in the world. Magnetogorsk is located east of the Urals, out of Hitler's reach. Over time, more and more Soviet industrial capacity would move east of the Urals.
Saving Italy's arse in Greece is really what fricked Hitler and set the whole timeline back. He needed to attack sooner, not later.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 12:56 pm to LA Lightning
quote:
He would have been better served to throw his might at Moscow and sooner in the year, rather than splitting up his forces into multiple objectives in the manner he did. Had too much belief in the invincible quality of his armies.
Any offensive he made in 1942 was doomed to failure regardless of where it hit. The Germans had pretty much killed whatever chance they had to militarily win the war when they failed to take Moscow in December 1941. For the whole of Operation Barbarossa, the Wehrmacht suffered over one million casualties. Their panzer divisions had been wrecked, with some down to fewer than 20 tanks from an initial strength of 150. They didn't have enough strength to launch another attack on Moscow, as that was the most heavily defended part of the line and the point where Stavka expected the Germans to try to hit again.
So Hitler decided to go for the oil fields of southern Russia. Okay. Fine. But let's say you manage to capture the oil fields intact (which the Russians weren't going to let happen). How are you going to transport that oil out of the region, refine it, and distribute it to your units? How are you going to protect it from Allied bombing raids coming from Iraq and Iran? How are you going to hold off the eventual Russian counterattack?
There was no way for Fall Blau to have succeeded. It was a fool's errand.
This post was edited on 2/2/26 at 12:57 pm
Popular
Back to top


2






