Favorite team:Ole Miss 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:966
Registered on:9/3/2024
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:


What products for AT&T?


I was Phone, Uverse and internet. Customer service got so bad I couldn't take it anymore. Maybe it has gotten better since covid. But from 2012-2020 it was a miserable product.
I have no issues with Spectrum. ATT is dog shite and has been for about 15 years.
I agree. The first 20 minutes I was wondering why Pablo Escobar talked all funny.
I'm Angel Reese

Generally an all star poster but I get roped into stupid arguments and then flat out have my facts wrong once in a blue moon and will never admit it.
quote:

Even when their was a spring portal, that was an SEC rule.


It’s why Nico Iamalava ended up at UCLA. Couldn’t transfer in conference. Probably would have saved Freeze’s job.
Watched this last night. One of the worst resolutions and endings I've seen in a while. They even set up for a sequel. You literally watch the credits and have very little information on what actually was going on the whole movie and left a ton of stuff unanswered. It was like a season 1 cliffhanger.
quote:

I wonder if the NCAA has an ace up their sleeve on the Chambliss issue? NCAA ruled him ineligible. Local court enjoined the NCAA ruling. I wonder if the NCAA will seek to vacate wins, prevent post season participation or something similar? Maybe not, but the precedent created is alarming.


Not really. The NCAA didn’t really fight very hard. They didn’t want to let a 6th year go without looking like they were fighting it. But the facts are still true he deserved a 6th year. The NCAA just didn’t want to approve it and have percent for hundreds of players wanting a 6th year for no reason.
quote:


it's rather pointless if they don't make the bridge over the bay 3 lanes. Now we'll just have another point where idiots have to merge and traffic will be backed up b/c of it b/c people are fricking idiots and aren't capable of merging or allowing people to merge without everyone having to come to a stop.


The long term plan is to 6 Lane the bridge across the bay. I think they want this bridge to take the traffic away from the tunnel and the tunnel be for local traffic. That is what I saw on a couple of YouTube videos about it. It is all about money though. They want to make it a toll road. Locals are fighting pretty hard about it.
You are bringing a troll account on a team site to the SEC rant?

Well that's actually par for the course for the course.
quote:

Its not, because the ones going 20 over aren't slowing down traffic behind them.


So your issue isn't left lane cruising. It is slowing you down. I agree. But your gripe is framed wrong.

You want to be able to do it but not other people.
quote:


I want left land cruising to have stiff fines.


I absolutely agree. But practically how do you do it? What is the speed threshold? Someone going 5 over cruising in the left lane? Ok. But what about the people going 20 over in the left lane that never get over? Is it not the same thing?
He has an a+ so far. Looking like 9-3 give or take a game this year with a tough schedule. If he can rebuild the offense going into 27 then I think he was a great hire. But too early to tell. This is a stupid question right now.
quote:

The bad news is that they are installing a new offense, and first year OCs are a crapshoot at any school.


It is the same offense. JDB was here under Kiffin 2 years ago.
Much improved on defense slight drop off on offense in 2026.

2027 will depend on QB.

re: Palworld

Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 8/2/26 at 7:26 pm to
Btw I played the whole game on my old as shite XBONE. Some stuff you can’t do but you can play the whole game no problem. Especially if you play on the cloud.

re: Lane is about make OM pay

Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 7/30/26 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

I do not know, not trying to troll.


Building a roster under a soft salary cap. You have 2 players signed and assumed locked in for the roster for 26. 2 weeks later they back out. You have to go find players and probably pay more than you would have to replace them.

Not apples to apples but it’s like signing and old school NLI in December then in February signs with another team. The original team could hold that players NLI for 12 months.

This is an attempt to get back to that to have some guard rails. When you are signed you are locked in. Everyone wants Ole Miss to win to set precedent that these Rev Share contracts are enforceable.

Only LsU fans are so biased they can’t see the forest for the trees because it is their players.

re: Lane is about make OM pay

Posted by 03 West CoChamps on 7/30/26 at 8:06 am to
quote:

I’m sure future recruits will love to sign rev share agreements with Ole Miss knowing they will be buried in litigation if they later contest terms of contract.


The irony is LSU has the same exact language in their contracts. Lol
He wasn’t ready last season but played pretty well at the end of the year. I would guess he is a top 3-4 QB in the conference this year with a chance to be 3-4 in the country. Potential is there. Aggies and blind and LSU is mad he didn’t end up in BR.
I use it as a term for a Republican who votes with the Dems.

Also yes Trump is a Populist the Rep party is the big tent party currently and a large coalition so that fits.

The old school Republican of the W era are dying out thankfully.
quote:

Rev share isnt paid out right away. It’s paid in monthly installment. Since they left within a month there is a minimal amount of money paid out, but old piss wants the full mil lol. It won't hold up in court. It sucks that your team is so broke they have to sue prior athletes.


For the 100th time retard it isn’t getting money back. It is a buyout clause. The contract states if you leave and not fulfill the players end of the contract then they owe “x” amount of dollars. They broke the contract and haven’t paid the buyout. Has zero to do with how much they were paid.
quote:

There is a lot of interesting grey area in contract law as it pertains to independent contractors, especially if you're seeking financial damages when the other party received zero consideration. I think people are overexaggerating a potential hit to the cap as that money could just be funneled through a booster as NIL payments.


Your mental gymnastics in this thread that LSU can do no wrong is quite the sight. Keep going.